“BJP to Provide Rs 21,000, Nutritional Kits, and Financial Aid for Children in Delhi Polls Manifesto”

BJP Unveils Welfare-Centric Delhi Poll Manifesto, Pledges Rs 21,000 for Pregnant Women

In a bid to prioritize women’s welfare, Union Minister JP Nadda today launched the first part of the BJP’s manifesto for the upcoming Delhi elections, scheduled for February 5. Nadda emphasized the party’s commitment to enhancing the well-being of women in the capital, declaring them at the heart of its welfare initiatives.

The BJP’s ‘Sankalp Patra’ outlines several key welfare measures aimed at supporting women and families in Delhi. Pregnant women will receive one-time financial assistance of Rs 21,000, along with six nutritional kits. In addition, financial aid will be provided to families with children, including Rs 5,000 for the first child and Rs 6,000 for the second.

The BJP also introduced the Mahila Smriddhi Yojana, which will provide women with a monthly assistance of Rs 2,500. This initiative aims to further empower women, ensuring their financial independence and social upliftment.

Nadda also took a direct swipe at the ruling Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), accusing them of failing to honor their 2021 promise of providing Rs 1,000 to women in Delhi. He asserted that the AAP had failed to implement this promise not only in Delhi but also in Punjab.

In a significant move to address the rising costs of living, Nadda announced that the BJP government would provide a Rs 500 subsidy on LPG cylinders. Additionally, the party promised two free cylinders during major festivals such as Diwali and Holi, offering relief to households in the capital.

With these promises, the BJP is seeking to consolidate its support among women voters, assuring them of continued welfare schemes and a focus on women’s empowerment. The manifesto is set to become a central point of discussion in the lead-up to the Delhi elections.

Courtesy: India Today

BJP’s Delhi Poll Manifesto: Ayushman Bharat, Senior Citizen Benefits, and Atal Canteens Promised

In the release of the first part of its manifesto for the Delhi Assembly elections, Union Minister JP Nadda outlined several welfare initiatives that would benefit the people of Delhi if the BJP comes to power. With a strong focus on healthcare and support for vulnerable sections of society, the BJP’s proposals aim to address the city’s needs and counter the claims of the ruling Aam Aadmi Party (AAP).

1. Ayushman Bharat Health Scheme:
Nadda assured that the BJP would implement the Ayushman Bharat health scheme in Delhi in the first cabinet meeting, once the party forms the government. This is a direct counter to the AAP’s opposition to the central scheme, which it had dismissed, claiming that Delhi already had “superior” healthcare schemes in place. The BJP’s move seeks to provide health coverage to a larger number of people in the city, aiming to ensure broader access to healthcare services.

2. Enhanced Health Cover for Senior Citizens:
The manifesto also promises significant health benefits for senior citizens. An additional health cover of Rs 5 lakh will be provided, bringing the total health coverage for the elderly to Rs 10 lakh, ensuring better healthcare access for this vulnerable group.

3. Senior Citizen Pension Scheme:
The BJP unveiled a comprehensive pension scheme for senior citizens. Those in the 60-70 age group will receive a monthly pension ranging from Rs 2,000 to Rs 2,500, while individuals above 70 years will receive Rs 3,000. For Divyangs and widows, the pension will be increased to Rs 3,000 to support their well-being.

4. Atal Canteens in Slums:
In a bid to address food insecurity, the BJP promised the establishment of Atal Canteens in every slum area. These canteens will provide a full meal at an affordable rate of just Rs 5, ensuring that the underprivileged have access to nutritious food.

5. Allegations Against AAP’s Mohalla Clinics:
As a sharp critique of the AAP’s health initiatives, particularly the Mohalla Clinics, Nadda accused the clinics of being “dens of corruption.” He alleged that a Rs 300 crore scam had taken place under the AAP government. Nadda pledged that, if the BJP comes to power, all such allegations will be thoroughly investigated, and those found responsible will face legal consequences.

The BJP’s manifesto reflects a strong emphasis on healthcare reforms, support for the elderly, food security, and accountability in governance. As the party prepares for the February 5 elections, these promises aim to appeal to a wide cross-section of Delhi’s population.

Courtesy: IndiaTV

References

• ^ in 2002
• ^ Sharma (2019), p. 523: “First, citizenship status biased towards religious identity is by no means a new idea…. A careful study of the policies and laws related to citizenship, adopted since independence, substantiates the assertion that citizenship in India has always been based on an implicit belief that India is for Hindus.”
• ^ Sen (2018), pp. 10–11: “Nehru’s response [to Patel’s warning] made it clear that Muslim migrants from Pakistan could not join the ranks of refugees in India… Thus, despite broad public statements promising citizenship to all displaced persons from Pakistan, Hindu migrants alone counted as citizen-refugees in post-partition India.”
• ^ Jayal (2019), pp. 34–35: “While some elements of religious difference had… been covertly smuggled in earlier, this bill seeks to do so overtly.”
• ^ Jayal (2019), pp. 33–50: “While some elements of religious difference had… been covertly smuggled in earlier, this bill seeks to do so overtly.”
• ^ For the electoral results of the BJP’s predecessors, see the JP and BJS articles.
• References
• Explanatory notes
• ^ in 2002
• ^ Sharma (2019), p. 523: “First, citizenship status biased towards religious identity is by no means a new idea…. A careful study of the policies and laws related to citizenship, adopted since independence, substantiates the assertion that citizenship in India has always been based on an implicit belief that India is for Hindus.”
• ^ Sen (2018), pp. 10–11: “Nehru’s response [to Patel’s warning] made it clear that Muslim migrants from Pakistan could not join the ranks of refugees in India… Thus, despite broad public statements promising citizenship to all displaced persons from Pakistan, Hindu migrants alone counted as citizen-refugees in post-partition India.”
• ^ Jayal (2019), pp. 34–35: “While some elements of religious difference had… been covertly smuggled in earlier, this bill seeks to do so overtly.”
• ^ Jayal (2019), pp. 33–50: “While some elements of religious difference had… been covertly smuggled in earlier, this bill seeks to do so overtly.”
• ^ For the electoral results of the BJP’s predecessors, see the JP and BJS articles.
• References
• Explanatory notes
• ^ in 2002
• ^ Sharma (2019), p. 523: “First, citizenship status biased towards religious identity is by no means a new idea…. A careful study of the policies and laws related to citizenship, adopted since independence, substantiates the assertion that citizenship in India has always been based on an implicit belief that India is for Hindus.”
• ^ Sen (2018), pp. 10–11: “Nehru’s response [to Patel’s warning] made it clear that Muslim migrants from Pakistan could not join the ranks of refugees in India… Thus, despite broad public statements promising citizenship to all displaced persons from Pakistan, Hindu migrants alone counted as citizen-refugees in post-partition India.”
• ^ Jayal (2019), pp. 34–35: “While some elements of religious difference had… been covertly smuggled in earlier, this bill seeks to do so overtly.”
• ^ Jayal (2019), pp. 33–50: “While some elements of religious difference had… been covertly smuggled in earlier, this bill seeks to do so overtly.”
• ^ For the electoral results of the BJP’s predecessors, see the JP and BJS articles.
• References
• Explanatory notes
• ^ in 2002
• ^ Sharma (2019), p. 523: “First, citizenship status biased towards religious identity is by no means a new idea…. A careful study of the policies and laws related to citizenship, adopted since independence, substantiates the assertion that citizenship in India has always been based on an implicit belief that India is for Hindus.”
• ^ Sen (2018), pp. 10–11: “Nehru’s response [to Patel’s warning] made it clear that Muslim migrants from Pakistan could not join the ranks of refugees in India… Thus, despite broad public statements promising citizenship to all displaced persons from Pakistan, Hindu migrants alone counted as citizen-refugees in post-partition India.”
• ^ Jayal (2019), pp. 34–35: “While some elements of religious difference had… been covertly smuggled in earlier, this bill seeks to do so overtly.”
• ^ Jayal (2019), pp. 33–50: “While some elements of religious difference had… been covertly smuggled in earlier, this bill seeks to do so overtly.”
• ^ For the electoral results of the BJP’s predecessors, see the JP and BJS articles.
• References
• Explanatory notes
• ^ in 2002
• ^ Sharma (2019), p. 523: “First, citizenship status biased towards religious identity is by no means a new idea…. A careful study of the policies and laws related to citizenship, adopted since independence, substantiates the assertion that citizenship in India has always been based on an implicit belief that India is for Hindus.”
• ^ Sen (2018), pp. 10–11: “Nehru’s response [to Patel’s warning] made it clear that Muslim migrants from Pakistan could not join the ranks of refugees in India… Thus, despite broad public statements promising citizenship to all displaced persons from Pakistan, Hindu migrants alone counted as citizen-refugees in post-partition India.”
• ^ Jayal (2019), pp. 34–35: “While some elements of religious difference had… been covertly smuggled in earlier, this bill seeks to do so overtly.”
• ^ Jayal (2019), pp. 33–50: “While some elements of religious difference had… been covertly smuggled in earlier, this bill seeks to do so overtly.”
• ^ For the electoral results of the BJP’s predecessors, see the JP and BJS articles.
• References
• Explanatory notes
• ^ in 2002
• ^ Sharma (2019), p. 523: “First, citizenship status biased towards religious identity is by no means a new idea…. A careful study of the policies and laws related to citizenship, adopted since independence, substantiates the assertion that citizenship in India has always been based on an implicit belief that India is for Hindus.”
• ^ Sen (2018), pp. 10–11: “Nehru’s response [to Patel’s warning] made it clear that Muslim migrants from Pakistan could not join the ranks of refugees in India… Thus, despite broad public statements promising citizenship to all displaced persons from Pakistan, Hindu migrants alone counted as citizen-refugees in post-partition India.”
• ^ Jayal (2019), pp. 34–35: “While some elements of religious difference had… been covertly smuggled in earlier, this bill seeks to do so overtly.”
• ^ Jayal (2019), pp. 33–50: “While some elements of religious difference had… been covertly smuggled in earlier, this bill seeks to do so overtly.”
• ^ For the electoral results of the BJP’s predecessors, see the JP and BJS articles.
• References
• Explanatory notes
• ^ in 2002
• ^ Sharma (2019), p. 523: “First, citizenship status biased towards religious identity is by no means a new idea…. A careful study of the policies and laws related to citizenship, adopted since independence, substantiates the assertion that citizenship in India has always been based on an implicit belief that India is for Hindus.”
• ^ Sen (2018), pp. 10–11: “Nehru’s response [to Patel’s warning] made it clear that Muslim migrants from Pakistan could not join the ranks of refugees in India… Thus, despite broad public statements promising citizenship to all displaced persons from Pakistan, Hindu migrants alone counted as citizen-refugees in post-partition India.”
• ^ Jayal (2019), pp. 34–35: “While some elements of religious difference had… been covertly smuggled in earlier, this bill seeks to do so overtly.”
• ^ Jayal (2019), pp. 33–50: “While some elements of religious difference had… been covertly smuggled in earlier, this bill seeks to do so overtly.”
• ^ For the electoral results of the BJP’s predecessors, see the JP and BJS articles.
• References
• Explanatory notes
• ^ in 2002
• ^ Sharma (2019), p. 523: “First, citizenship status biased towards religious identity is by no means a new idea…. A careful study of the policies and laws related to citizenship, adopted since independence, substantiates the assertion that citizenship in India has always been based on an implicit belief that India is for Hindus.”
• ^ Sen (2018), pp. 10–11: “Nehru’s response [to Patel’s warning] made it clear that Muslim migrants from Pakistan could not join the ranks of refugees in India… Thus, despite broad public statements promising citizenship to all displaced persons from Pakistan, Hindu migrants alone counted as citizen-refugees in post-partition India.”
• ^ Jayal (2019), pp. 34–35: “While some elements of religious difference had… been covertly smuggled in earlier, this bill seeks to do so overtly.”
• ^ Jayal (2019), pp. 33–50: “While some elements of religious difference had… been covertly smuggled in earlier, this bill seeks to do so overtly.”
• ^ For the electoral results of the BJP’s predecessors, see the JP and BJS articles.