Canada Evades Trump’s Tariffs – For Now, But Uncertainty Looms

After weeks of anxiety over the possibility of a trade war with the United States, Canada has temporarily avoided the tariffs that U.S. President Donald Trump had threatened to impose. However, the reprieve may only last for a short time, as Trump has indicated that tariffs could be imposed on Canada and Mexico as early as February 1st. His administration has ordered a review of U.S. trade relationships, focusing on any unfair practices, including trade ties with Canada, Mexico, and China.

Trump’s threats to impose tariffs include a 25% import duty on goods from Canada and Mexico, a 10% tariff on global imports, and a 60% levy on Chinese products. These potential moves are part of his broader trade agenda, aimed at protecting American industries and jobs.

Canada Responds with Caution

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau responded to the potential tariff threat by saying that Canada would retaliate if necessary. In a press briefing on Tuesday, he remarked, “If the president does choose to proceed with tariffs, Canada will respond – and everything is on the table.” His statement highlights Canada’s readiness to take action, should the U.S. follow through with its tariff plan.

While Canadian officials initially expressed relief over the delay caused by the U.S. review process, they are wary of the ongoing threat. In an evening interview at the Oval Office, President Trump confirmed that February 1 could be the date when the U.S. administration imposes 25% tariffs on Canadian and Mexican goods. The trade relationship between the two countries is crucial, with approximately 75% of Canadian exports heading to the U.S.

The Economic Stakes for Canada

Canada’s reliance on trade with the U.S. means that the country is highly vulnerable to the impacts of tariffs. In 2022, U.S.-Canada trade reached an estimated $909 billion. With the looming threat of tariffs, the Canadian government is preparing for all eventualities. Trudeau emphasized that Canada offers a stable, secure, and reliable trading partner for the U.S., particularly as both nations face global uncertainties.

In a bid to reassure Trump of Canada’s strategic value, Trudeau highlighted Canada’s role as a key supplier of energy and critical minerals that the U.S. economy will need for future growth. The Canadian prime minister’s comments seemed to appeal to Trump’s vision of a prosperous “golden age” for America, reinforcing the idea that Canada’s resources are vital to the U.S. economy.

The Political Backdrop and Countermeasures

The threat of tariffs is not without political consequences. In November, President Trump argued that tariffs on Canadian and Mexican goods were necessary to compel these nations to crack down on illegal immigration and drug smuggling into the U.S. Canada’s Foreign Minister Melanie Joly had previously warned that such tariffs could spark the “biggest trade war between Canada and the U.S. in decades.”

In response, Ottawa is reportedly preparing counter-tariffs, with some reports estimating the value of these retaliatory measures to be in the billions of dollars. Trudeau has supported the principle of imposing “dollar-for-dollar” matching tariffs, a strategy aimed at ensuring Canada’s response is proportionate to any U.S. action.

Continued Lobbying for Trade Benefits

Despite the looming threat of tariffs, Canadian officials remain committed to lobbying U.S. counterparts on the economic benefits of their trade relationship. Canada’s trade with the U.S. is not just about numbers – it represents a highly integrated supply chain and mutual economic benefits. Trudeau’s cabinet is also focusing on strengthening U.S.-Canada ties, with officials meeting in Quebec to discuss strategies to navigate the shifting political landscape.

Conclusion

While Canada has avoided immediate tariffs, the uncertainty around the U.S.-Canada trade relationship continues to create unease. The coming weeks will be crucial, as the U.S. review process moves forward and the potential for tariff imposition remains. Canada’s strategic positioning as a key supplier to the U.S. economy and its willingness to respond to any trade challenges will be key factors in shaping the future of North American trade relations.

Canada, US, and Mexico: A Shift in Trade Relations Under Trump’s New Review

In his first term, President Donald Trump’s administration renegotiated the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), resulting in the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). This trilateral free trade deal aimed to enhance trade relations between the three countries. However, in a move that further complicates North American trade dynamics, President Trump signed a presidential memo directing federal agencies to review the impact of the agreement on American workers, farmers, ranchers, service providers, and businesses.

A Broader Assessment of Trade and Migration

The presidential memo, signed shortly after Trump’s inauguration, specifically instructs the secretaries of commerce and homeland security to evaluate the effects of the USMCA on various sectors of the U.S. economy. The review also extends to assessing the “unlawful migration and fentanyl flows” from both Canada and Mexico, two key trade partners in the agreement.

While the U.S.-Mexico border has seen a surge in unlawful crossings and drug seizures, the situation at the U.S.-Canada border is markedly different. Official data shows that while unlawful crossings and drug-related issues persist, the numbers at the Canadian border are significantly lower compared to the southern border with Mexico.

Review and Consequences

The comprehensive review is set to conclude by April 1st, and its outcome could have significant implications for trade relations and border security policies. The U.S. government’s scrutiny of trade and immigration flows between the three nations suggests that Trump’s administration continues to prioritize what it perceives as American economic and security interests.

As Canada, the U.S., and Mexico navigate these evolving trade and security concerns, the future of the USMCA and broader North American relations remains uncertain, especially with Trump’s tariff threats and the heightened focus on migration and drug control. The upcoming review may provide clarity on the path forward or further complicate the trade landscape between these major North American nations.

Canada’s New Security Measures and Trump’s Tariff Strategy: The Trade-Offs Ahead

In December, Canada announced a significant new commitment to securing its border with the United States, promising to invest C$1.3 billion (approximately $900 million or £700 million) into enhanced security measures. These measures include stronger surveillance systems and the creation of a joint “strike force” aimed at combating transnational organized crime. This move is in response to ongoing concerns regarding border security and illegal activities, and it aligns with the broader goals of improving U.S.-Canada relations, particularly as trade tensions and concerns over security continue to rise.

Trump’s Tariff Policy: Economic Vision vs. Risks

For President Donald Trump, tariffs are a cornerstone of his economic strategy. He views tariffs as a means to grow the U.S. economy by protecting American jobs, fostering domestic industries, and raising tax revenue. Throughout his first term, he championed tariffs on various products and countries, believing that they would benefit American workers and help restore manufacturing jobs that were outsourced over previous decades.

However, economists have raised several warnings about the long-term effects of such a tariff-heavy approach. Many argue that while tariffs may offer short-term protection to certain industries, they could lead to higher prices for American consumers. The increased costs of goods and services caused by tariffs are likely to be passed down to consumers, making everyday items more expensive.

Furthermore, businesses that rely on imports for their products or production processes could suffer significant pain. Foreign retaliation in the form of counter-tariffs is a risk that could escalate trade wars, leading to a slowdown in overall economic activity. The imposition of tariffs could disrupt supply chains, reduce trade volumes, and potentially harm U.S. companies that depend on global markets.

The Balancing Act: Security and Trade

As Canada works to bolster its border security measures, it remains to be seen how these efforts will impact its trade relationship with the U.S. The security investment could help alleviate some of the concerns Trump’s administration has regarding illegal immigration and cross-border criminal activities. At the same time, Canada’s commitment to strengthening trade relationships and enhancing its border security may serve as a countermeasure to Trump’s tariffs, signaling that both countries are willing to collaborate in addressing mutual concerns.

The dynamic between security and economic policies is delicate, and Canada’s response to Trump’s tariff threats will likely depend on how these two issues — security and trade — evolve in the coming months. While Canada’s security enhancements may provide short-term relief from some of Trump’s trade concerns, the ongoing tariff debate highlights the complexities and risks involved in balancing national security, trade policies, and economic growth.

Courtesy: CBC News

References

• ^ 36 U.S.C. § 302
• ^ “The Great Seal of the United States” (PDF). U.S. Department of State, Bureau of Public Affairs. 2003. Retrieved February 12, 2020.
• ^ An Act To make The Star-Spangled Banner the national anthem of the United States of America (H.R. 14). 71st United States Congress. March 3, 1931.
• ^ “2020 Census Illuminates Racial and Ethnic Composition of the Country”. United States Census. Retrieved August 13, 2021.
• ^ “Race and Ethnicity in the United States: 2010 Census and 2020 Census”. United States Census. Retrieved August 13, 2021.
• ^ “A Breakdown of 2020 Census Demographic Data”. NPR. August 13, 2021.
• ^ Jump up to:^a b Staff (June 8, 2007). “In Depth: Topics A to Z (Religion)”. Gallup, Inc. Retrieved July 1, 2024.
• ^ Compton’s Pictured Encyclopedia and Fact-index: Ohio. 1963. p. 336.
• ^ “The Water Area of Each State”. United States Geological Survey. 2018. Retrieved January 29, 2024.
• ^ Jump up to:^a b Areas of the 50 states and the District of Columbia but not Puerto Rico nor other island territories per “State Area Measurements and Internal Point Coordinates”. Census.gov. August 2010. Retrieved March 31, 2020. reflect base feature updates made in the MAF/TIGER database through August, 2010.
• ^ “National Population Totals and Components of Change: April 1, 2020 to July 1, 2024”. United States Census Bureau. Retrieved December 20, 2024.
• ^ “U.S. Census Bureau Today Delivers State Population Totals for Congressional Apportionment”. United States Census. Retrieved April 26, 2021. The 2020 census is as of April 1, 2020.
• ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g} “World Economic Outlook Database, October 2024 Edition. (United States)”. www.imf.org. International Monetary Fund. October 22, 2024. Retrieved October 22, 2024.
• ^ “Income in the United States: 2023”. Census.gov. p. 53. Retrieved December 15, 2024.
• ^ “Human Development Report 2023/24” (PDF). United Nations Development Programme. March 13, 2024. Retrieved March 13, 2024.
• ^ “The Difference Between .us vs .com”. Cozab. January 3, 2022. Archived from the original on April 16, 2023. Retrieved August 11, 2023.
• ^ Jump up to:^ab
  • “Common Core Document to U.N. Committee on Human Rights”. U.S. State Department. December 30, 2011. Item 22, 27, 80. Retrieved April 6, 2016.
  • “U.S. Insular Areas: application of the U.S. Constitution” (PDF). U.S. General Accounting Office Report. November 1997. pp. 1, 6, 39n. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 3, 2013. Retrieved April 6, 2016.
• ^ “China”. The World Factbook. Retrieved June 10, 2016.
• ^ “United States”. Encyclopædia Britannica. Archived from the original on December 19, 2013. Retrieved January 31, 2010.
• ^ Jump up to:^a b DeLear, Byron (July 4, 2013). “Who coined ‘United States of America’? Mystery might have intriguing answer”. The Christian Science Monitor. Boston, Massachusetts.
• ^ Fay, John (July 15, 2016). “The forgotten Irishman who named the ‘United States of America'”. IrishCentral.com. According to the NY Historical Society, Stephen Moylan was the man responsible for the earliest documented use of the phrase ‘United States of America’. But who was Stephen Moylan?
• ^ A PLANTER (April 6, 1776). “To the inhabitants of Virginia”. The Virginia Gazette. Vol. 5, no. 1287. Williamsburg, Virginia: Dixon and Hunter’s. Archived from the original on December 19, 2014.
• ^ “A Planter’ s Address to the Inhabitants of Virginia”. American Archives. Northern Illinois University. Retrieved May 25, 2024.
• ^ Jump up to:^a b Safire 2003, p. 199.
• ^ Mostert 2005, p. 18.
• ^ Davis 1996, p. 7.
• ^ “Is USA A Noun Or Adjective?”. Dictionary.com. March 9, 2017.
• ^ Jump up to:^a b U.S. Government Publishing Office Style Manual. January 12, 2017. pp. 222–223. Retrieved September 3, 2020.
• ^ “”The States””. Longman dictionary. Retrieved September 27, 2024.
• ^ “Stateside”. Merriam-Webster. September 27, 2024. Retrieved October 4, 2024.
• ^ “Amerigo Vespucci”. Encyclopædia Britannica. Archived from the original on July 10, 2012. Retrieved July 7, 2011.
• ^ Sider, Sandra (2007). Handbook to Life in Renaissance Europe. Oxford University Press. p. 226. ISBN 978-0-19-533084-7.
• ^ Szalay, Jessie (September 20, 2017). “Amerigo Vespucci: Facts, Biography & Naming of America”. Live Science. Retrieved June 23, 2019.
• ^ Allen, Erin (July 4, 2016). “How Did America Get Its Name?”. Library of Congress Blog. Retrieved September 3, 2020.
• ^ Wilson, Kenneth G. (1993). The Columbia guide to standard American English. New York: Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-0-231-06989-2.
• ^ “Cliff Palace” at Colorado Encyclopedia. Retrieved January 31, 2024
• ^ Erlandson, Rick & Vellanoweth 2008, p. 19.
• ^ Savage 2011, pp. 55–58.
• ^ Waters & Stafford 2007, pp. 1122–1126.
• ^ Flannery 2015, pp. 173–185.
• ^ Lockard 2010, p. 315.
• ^ Johansen, Bruce (2006). The Native Peoples of North America: A History, Volume 1. Rutgers University Press. ISBN 978-0-8135-3899-0.
• ^ Thornton 1998, p. 34.
• ^ Jump up to:^a b Perdue & Green 2005, p. 40.
• ^ Haines, Haines & Steckel 2000, p. 12.
• ^ Ralph H. Vigil (January 1, 2006). “The Expedition and the Struggle for Justice”. In Patricia Kay Galloway (ed.). The Hernando de Soto Expedition: History, Historiography, and “discovery” in the Southeast. U of Nebraska Press. p. 329. ISBN 0-8032-7132-8.
• ^ {{cite book|author=Charles M. Hudson|title=Knights of Spain, Warriors of the Sun: Hernando de Soto and the South’s Ancient Chiefdoms|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=eapFDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA130%7Cdate=15 January 2018|publisher=University of Georgia Pres
• ^ Davis, Frederick T. (1932). “The Record of Ponce de Leon’s Discovery of Florida, 1513”. The QUARTERLY Periodical of THE FLORIDA HISTORICAL SOCIETY. XI (1): 5–6.
• ^ Florida Center for Instructional Technology (2002). “Pedro Menendez de Aviles Claims Florida for Spain”. A Short History of Florida. University of South Florida.
• ^ “Not So Fast, Jamestown: St. Augustine Was Here First”. NPR. February 28, 2015. Retrieved March 5, 2021.
• ^ Petto, Christine Marie (2007). When France Was King of Cartography: The Patronage and Production of Maps in Early Modern France. Lexington Books. p. 125. ISBN 978-0-7391-6247-7.
• ^ Seelye, James E. Jr.; Selby, Shawn (2018). Shaping North America: From Exploration to the American Revolution [3 volumes]. ABC-CLIO. p. 344. ISBN 978-1-4408-3669-5.
• ^ Bellah, Robert Neelly; Madsen, Richard; Sullivan, William M.; Swidler, Ann; Tipton, Steven M. (1985). Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life. University of California Press. p. 220. ISBN 978-0-520-05388-5. OL 7708974M.
• ^ Remini 2007, pp. 2–3
• ^ Johnson 1997, pp. 26–30
• ^ Ripper, 2008, p. 6
• ^ Ehrenpreis, Jamie E.; Ehrenpreis, Eli D. (April 2022). “A Historical Perspective of Healthcare Disparity and Infectious Disease in the Native American Population”. The American Journal of the Medical Sciences. 363 (4): 288–294. doi:10.1016/j.amjms.2022.01.005. ISSN 0002-9629. PMC 8785365. PMID 35085528.
• ^ Joseph 2016, p. 590.
• ^ Stannard, 1993 p. xii
• ^ Ripper, 2008 p. 5
• ^ Calloway, 1998, p. 55
• ^ Thomas, Hugh (1997). The Slave Trade: The Story of the Atlantic Slave Trade: 1440–1870. Simon and Schuster. pp. 516. ISBN 0-684-83565-7.
• ^ Bilhartz, Terry D.; Elliott, Alan C. (2007). Currents in American History: A Brief History of the United States. M.E. Sharpe. ISBN 978-0-7656-1817-7.
• ^ Wood, Gordon S. (1998). The Creation of the American Republic, 1776–1787. UNC Press Books. p. 263. ISBN 978-0-8078-4723-7.
• ^ Ratcliffe, Donald (2013). “The Right to Vote and the Rise of Democracy, 1787–1828”. Journal of the Early Republic. 33 (2): 220. doi:10.1353/jer.2013.0033. ISSN 0275-1275. S2CID 145135025.
• ^ Walton, 2009, pp. 38–39
• ^ Walton, 2009, p. 35
• ^ Otis, James (1763). The Rights of the British Colonies Asserted and Proved. ISBN 978-0-665-52678-7.
• ^ Foner, Eric (1998). The Story of American Freedom (1st ed.). W.W. Norton. pp. 4–5. ISBN 978-0-393-04665-6. story of American freedom.
• ^ Jump up to:^a b Fabian Young, Alfred; Nash, Gary B.; Raphael, Ray (2011). Revolutionary Founders: Rebels, Radicals, and Reformers in the Making of the Nation. Random House Digital. pp. 4–7. ISBN 978-0-307-27110-5.
• ^ Yick Wo vs. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356, 370
• ^ Richard Buel, Securing the Revolution: Ideology in American Politics, 1789–1815 (1972)
• ^ Becker et al (2002), ch 1
• ^ “Republicanism”. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. June 19, 2006. Retrieved September 20, 2022.
• ^ Miller, Hunter (ed.). “British-American Diplomacy: The Paris Peace Treaty of September 30, 1783”. The Avalon Project at Yale Law School.
• ^ Shōsuke Satō, History of the land question in the United States, Johns Hopkins University, (1886), p. 352
• ^ Foner 2020, p. 524.
• ^ OpenStax 2014, § 8.1.
• ^ Foner 2020, pp. 538–540.
• ^ Boyer, 2007, pp. 192–193
• ^ OpenStax 2014, § 8.3.
• ^ “Louisiana Purchase” (PDF). National Park Service. Retrieved March 1, 2011.
• ^ Harriss, Joseph A. “How the Louisiana Purchase Changed the World”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved June 25, 2024.
• ^ Wait, Eugene M. (1999). America and the War of 1812. Nova Publishers. p. 78. ISBN 978-1-56072-644-9.
• ^ “War of 1812”. Naval History and Heritage Command. April 10, 2024. Retrieved June 25, 2024.^{[permanent dead link]}
• ^ Klose, Nelson; Jones, Robert F. (1994). United States History to 1877. Barron’s Educational Series. p. 150. ISBN 978-0-8120-1834-9.
• ^ Jump up to:^a b Carlisle, Rodney P.; Golson, J. Geoffrey (2007). Manifest destiny and the expansion of America. Turning Points in History Series. Santa Barbara, Calif.: ABC-CLIO. p. 238. ISBN 978-1-85109-834-7. OCLC 659807062.
• ^ McPherson 1988, p. 41–46.
• ^ Hammond, John Craig (March 2019). “President, Planter, Politician: James Monroe, the Missouri Crisis, and the Politics of Slavery”. Journal of American History. 105 (4): 843–867. doi:10.1093/jahist/jaz002.
• ^ Frymer, Paul (2017). Building an American empire : the era of territorial and political expansion. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-1-4008-8535-0. OCLC 981954623.
• ^ Calloway, Colin G. (2019). First peoples : a documentary survey of American Indian history (6th ed.). Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, Macmillan Learning. ISBN 978-1-319-10491-7. OCLC 1035393060.
• ^ McPherson 1988, p. 45.
• ^ Michno, Gregory (2003). Encyclopedia of Indian Wars: Western Battles and Skirmishes, 1850–1890. Mountain Press Publishing. ISBN 978-0-87842-468-9.
• ^ Billington, Ray Allen; Ridge, Martin (2001). Westward Expansion: A History of the American Frontier. UNM Press. p. 22. ISBN 978-0-8263-1981-4.
• ^ Morrison, Michael A. (April 28, 1997). Slavery and the American West: The Eclipse of Manifest Destiny and the Coming of the Civil War. University of North Carolina Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 978-0-8078-4796-1.
• ^ Kemp, Roger L. (2010). Documents of American Democracy: A Collection of Essential Works. McFarland. p. 180. ISBN 978-0-7864-4210-2. Retrieved October 25, 2015.
• ^ McIlwraith, Thomas F.; Muller, Edward K. (2001). North America: The Historical Geography of a Changing Continent. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 61. ISBN 978-0-7425-0019-8. Retrieved October 25, 2015.
• ^
  • Meyer et al. 2001, From 1800 to 1900: “The discovery of gold in California in 1848 proved a momentous watershed for native people in the West. Hordes of single men stampeded to find fortune. Unrestrained by family, community, or church, they decimated the native population near the goldfields. California natives suffered the most complete genocide in U.S. history.”
  • Wolf, Jessica. “Revealing the history of genocide against California’s Native Americans”. UCLA Newsroom. Retrieved July 8, 2018.
  • Madley, Benjamin (2016). An American Genocide: The United States and the California Indian Catastrophe, 1846-1873. Yale University Press. ISBN 9780300230697.
  • Smithers 2012, p. 339: “The genocidal intent of California settlers and government officials was acted out in numerous battles and massacres (and aided by technological advances in weaponry, especially after the Civil War), in the abduction and sexual abuse of Indian women, and in the economic exploitation of Indian child labourers”
  • Blackhawk 2023, p. 38: “With these works, a near consensus emerged. By most scholarly definitions and consistent with the UN Convention, these scholars all asserted that genocide against at least some Indigenous peoples had occurred in North America following colonisation, perpetuated first by colonial empires and then by independent nation-states”
• ^ Rawls, James J. (1999). A Golden State: Mining and Economic Development in Gold Rush California. University of California Press. p. 20. ISBN 978-0-520-21771-3.
• ^ Walker Howe 2007, p. 52–54; Wright 2022.
• ^ Walker Howe 2007, p. 52–54; Rodriguez 2015, p. XXXIV; Wright 2022.
• ^ Walton, 2009, p. 43
• ^ Gordon, 2004, pp. 27, 29
• ^ Walker Howe 2007, p. 478, 481–482, 587–588.
• ^ “Milestone documents: Kansas–Missouri Act (1854)”. National Archives (Washington, D.C.). July 12, 2021. Retrieved January 5, 2025.
• ^ Murray, Stuart (2004). Atlas of American Military History. Infobase Publishing. p. 76. ISBN 978-1-4381-3025-5. Retrieved October 25, 2015. Lewis, Harold T. (2001). Christian Social Witness. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 53. ISBN 978-1-56101-188-9.
• ^ Woods, Michael E. (2012). “What Twenty-First-Century Historians Have Said about the Causes of Disunion: A Civil War Sesquicentennial Review of the Recent Literature”. The Journal of American History. 99 (2). [Oxford University Press, Organization of American Historians]: 415–439. doi:10.1093/jahist/jas272. ISSN 0021-8723. JSTOR 44306803. Retrieved April 29, 2023.
• ^ Silkenat, D. (2019). Raising the White Flag: How Surrender Defined the American Civil War. Civil War America. University of North Carolina Press. p. 25. ISBN 978-1-4696-4973-3. Retrieved April 29, 2023.
• ^ McPherson 1988, p. 236.
• ^ Vinovskis, Maris (1990). Toward A Social History of the American Civil War: Exploratory Essays. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press. p. 4. ISBN 978-0-521-39559-5.
• ^ McPherson 1988, pp. 273–274.
• ^ “The Fight for Equal Rights: Black Soldiers in the Civil War”. U.S. National Archives and Records Administration. August 15, 2016. By the end of the Civil War, roughly 179,000 black men (10% of the Union army) served as soldiers in the U.S. Army and another 19,000 served in the Navy.
• ^ Davis, Jefferson. A Short History of the Confederate States of America, 1890, 2010. ISBN 978-1-175-82358-8. Available free online as an ebook. Chapter LXXXVIII, “Re-establishment of the Union by force”, p. 503. Retrieved March 14, 2012.
• ^ Black, Jeremy (2011). Fighting for America: The Struggle for Mastery in North America, 1519–1871. Indiana University Press. p. 275. ISBN 978-0-253-35660-4.
• ^ Price, Marie; Benton-Short, Lisa (2008). Migrants to the Metropolis: The Rise of Immigrant Gateway Cities. Syracuse University Press. p. 51. ISBN 978-0-8156-3186-6.
• ^ “Overview + History | Ellis Island”. Statue of Liberty & Ellis Island. March 4, 2020. Retrieved September 10, 2021.
• ^ U.S. Bureau of the Census, Historical Statistics of the United States (1976) series C89–C119, pp. 105–109
• ^ Stephan Thernstrom, ed., Harvard Encyclopedia of American Ethnic Groups (1980) covers the history of all the main groups
• ^ “The Great Migration (1910–1970)”. National Archives. May 20, 2021.
• ^ “Purchase of Alaska, 1867”. Office of the Historian. U.S. Department of State. Retrieved December 23, 2014.
• ^ Woodward, C. Vann (1991). Reunion and Reaction: The Compromise of 1877 and the End of Reconstruction. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
• ^ Drew Gilpin Faust; Eric Foner; Clarence E. Walker. “White Southern Responses to Black Emancipation”. American Experience.
• ^ Trelease, Allen W. (1979). White Terror: The Ku Klux Klan Conspiracy and Southern Reconstruction. New York: Harper & Row. ISBN 0-313-21168-X.
• ^ Shearer Davis Bowman (1993). Masters and Lords: Mid-19th-Century U.S. Planters and Prussian Junkers. Oxford UP. p. 221. ISBN 978-0-19-53639