India has pushed for stronger WTO rules on fishing subsidies, advocating for a 25-year moratorium on distant-water fishing subsidies and a per capita distribution to tackle overfishing. The proposal received support from developing nations, countering claims of hindering progress in the negotiations.

India has called for stricter regulations on fishing subsidies under the World Trade Organization (WTO), citing concerns about the unequal distribution of financial support among countries involved in high seas fishing. A document submitted by India highlighted the stark disparity in subsidy amounts, pointing out that while India provides just USD 35 per fisher annually, some European nations offer up to USD 76,000 per fisher each year. India’s proposal aims to address overfishing and promote fairer practices by introducing measures such as a 25-year moratorium on subsidies for distant-water fishing and considering per capita distribution criteria. This approach is supported by developing nations, who argue that it would lead to more equitable and sustainable practices in global fisheries management.

India has also proposed that countries with a history of providing large subsidies for high seas fishing should be required to seek approval from the Committee on Fisheries Subsidies before granting such subsidies in the future. This proposal aims to curb harmful subsidies that contribute to overfishing and ensure that subsidies are provided in a manner that promotes sustainability and fairness in the global fishing industry. India’s stance at the WTO is backed by developing nations, who argue for stronger rules to protect marine resources and promote equitable fishing practices.

India has made these remarks during the ongoing meetings of the Negotiating Group on Rules (Fisheries Subsidies) in Geneva. The country has emphasized the need for stricter regulations on subsidies for high seas fishing, advocating for more equitable practices that can help prevent overfishing. India’s proposals aim to address the imbalance between the modest subsidies it provides and the much larger subsidies offered by some developed countries, particularly those in Europe. These discussions are seen as critical for ensuring the long-term sustainability of global fisheries and promoting fairer trade practices within the fishing industry.

COURTESY: WION

India has proposed strong regulations for countries that have historically subsidized distant-water fishing, which takes place 200 nautical miles from the shore. The country has called for a 25-year moratorium on subsidies at their current levels, aiming to address the significant disparity between the subsidies granted to different nations. India’s stance, presented in the ongoing WTO negotiations, seeks to level the playing field and promote more sustainable fishing practices, especially in the high seas. This proposal highlights the need for more equitable subsidy distribution, especially for developing nations engaged in fishing activities.

India’s call for stricter regulations on fishing subsidies was supported by countries such as Indonesia and other developing nations. These countries echoed India’s concerns about the disproportionate subsidies provided by some developed nations, particularly those engaged in distant-water fishing, and the need for fairer and more sustainable practices in the industry. India’s proposal, which includes a 25-year moratorium on current subsidy levels, aims to create a more balanced framework for fishing subsidies at the global level.

India has also called for adopting a ‘per capita distribution of subsidies’ criteria to address concerns over overfishing and capacity under the WTO framework, according to the document.

The document – Designing Disciplines For the Overcapacity and Overfishing Pillar:A case for intensity-based subsidies approach – was submitted by India and it would come up for discussion in the General Council meeting of the WTO at Geneva on December 16-17.

COURTESY: WION

India strongly criticized the accusations that it was stalling decisions at the World Trade Organization’s General Council (GC). The official stated that such claims were simply an excuse to promote weaker rules, which would allow the status quo of excessive and unsustainable subsidies to continue. India called on WTO members involved in distant-water fishing to halt all forms of subsidies for the next 25 years, emphasizing that these nations have been providing significantly higher subsidies and contributing to the unchecked depletion of fisheries resources. The General Council is the WTO’s highest decision-making body and plays a crucial role in shaping global trade rules.

India has proposed adopting a ‘per capita distribution of subsidies’ criterion to address overfishing and fishing capacity concerns under the World Trade Organization (WTO) framework. This suggestion was highlighted in a document titled “Designing Disciplines for the Overcapacity and Overfishing Pillar: A Case for Intensity-Based Subsidies Approach.” India submitted this document for discussion during the General Council meeting of the WTO in Geneva on December 16-17. This proposal aims to create more equitable and sustainable subsidy practices, particularly focusing on the environmental and resource-management aspects of global fisheries.

India has emphasized that the annual aggregate level of fisheries subsidies is not an accurate measure, as it includes both beneficial subsidies and subsistence support that are linked to livelihoods and do not contribute to overcapacity or overfishing. The country’s fisheries sector is traditional and small-scale, with a significant focus on supporting local communities. On the other hand, countries like Norway, China, Japan, and the US engage in distant-water fishing and provide substantial subsidies to their fishing industries, which contribute to the depletion of global fish stocks. India’s position is aimed at promoting a more equitable approach to fisheries subsidies, ensuring that the interests of developing nations are better represented and that overfishing is curtailed through responsible policy reforms at the WTO.

India’s position at the WTO underscores its concerns over the disproportionate level of subsidies provided by countries involved in distant-water fishing. These subsidies, according to India, significantly contribute to overfishing and the depletion of fish resources, especially in international waters. By advocating for a 25-year moratorium on such subsidies, India aims to curb the destructive effects of large-scale fishing practices and promote sustainable practices that benefit all nations, particularly those with smaller, traditional fishing sectors like itself.

COURTESY: WION

The country also called for a shift from aggregate subsidy levels to a per capita distribution model, ensuring that subsidies are more equitably distributed and targeted toward preserving livelihoods without exacerbating overcapacity and overfishing. India argues that such an approach would not only protect the marine ecosystem but also support the economic stability of local fishing communities that rely on sustainable practices.

India’s stance is gaining support from other developing nations, including Indonesia, who share similar concerns about the harmful impacts of distant-water fishing and the inequitable distribution of subsidies. These countries are urging the WTO to adopt stronger disciplines that will prevent the further exploitation of global fisheries resources by wealthier nations, which have the capacity to heavily subsidize their fishing industries.

The discussions are taking place amid increasing global concerns over the sustainability of marine ecosystems, with overfishing threatening biodiversity and the food security of millions of people who depend on fish as a primary source of protein. India’s proposal at the WTO highlights the need for a more balanced approach to global fisheries management, one that takes into account the needs of both developed and developing nations while ensuring the long-term health of marine resources.

As the WTO negotiations progress, the outcome of these discussions could have far-reaching implications for global fisheries management, with potential changes to subsidy rules that could reshape the fishing industry for years to come.

References

1. ^ Members and Observers Archived 10 September 2011 at the Wayback Machine at WTO official website
2. ^ Languages, Documentation and Information Management Division Archived 24 December 2011 at the Wayback Machine at WTO official site
3. ^ “Nigeria’s Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala confirmed as WTO chief”. the Guardian. 15 February 2021. Archived from the original on 1 March 2021. Retrieved 1 March 2021.
4. ^ “WTO Annual Report 2023”. www.wto.org. p. 199. Retrieved 7 April 2024.
5. ^ “WTO Annual Report 2023”. www.wto.org. p. 196. Retrieved 7 April 2024.
6. ^ “Overview of the WTO Secretariat”. WTO official website. Archived from the original on 1 September 2013. Retrieved 2 September 2013.
7. ^ Jump up to:^a b Oatley, Thomas (2019). International Political Economy (6th ed.). Routledge. pp. 51–52. ISBN 978-1-351-03464-7. Archived from the original on 14 February 2024. Retrieved 5 August 2021.
8. ^ “The WTO and the United Nations”. WTO. Archived from the original on 13 July 2007. Retrieved 21 October 2022.
9. ^ Krueger, Anne O. “International Economic Organizations, Developing Country Reforms, and Trade”. The Reporter. NBER. Archived from the original on 18 May 2017. Retrieved 20 May 2017.
10. ^ “Understanding the WTO – The GATT years: from Havana to Marrakesh”. WTO. Archived from the original on 5 March 2018. Retrieved 28 March 2019.
11. ^ Jump up to:^a b “Accession in perspective”. Handbook on Accession to the WTO. World Trade Organization. Archived from the original on 24 December 2013. Retrieved 22 December 2013.
12. ^ Jump up to:^a b “Understanding the WTO” (PDF). WTO. Archived (PDF) from the original on 6 March 2012.. (The document’s printed folio numbers do not match the PDF page numbers.)
13. ^ Malanczuk, P. (1999). “International Organisations and Space Law: World Trade Organization”. Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 442. p. 305. Bibcode:1999ESASP.442..305M.
14. ^ Jump up to:^a b “U.S. Trade Policy: Going it Alone vs. Abiding by the WTO”. Econofact. 15 June 2018. Archived from the original on 30 June 2018. Retrieved 30 June 2018.
15. ^ “WTO | Ministerial conferences”. www.wto.org. Archived from the original on 6 March 2021. Retrieved 18 February 2021.
16. ^ “WTO | Understanding the WTO – Whose WTO is it anyway?”. www.wto.org. Archived from the original on 4 July 2021. Retrieved 18 February 2021.
17. ^ “WTO | Understanding the WTO – the Secretariat”. www.wto.org. Archived from the original on 30 November 2021. Retrieved 22 February 2021.
18. ^ “WTO | Budget for the year”. www.wto.org. Archived from the original on 23 January 2022. Retrieved 22 February 2021.
19. ^ Broda, C.; Limão, N.; Weinstein, D. E. (2008). “Optimal Tariffs and Market Power: The Evidence”. American Economic Review. 98 (5): 2032–2065. doi:10.1257/aer.98.5.2032. S2CID 6116538. Archived from the original on 14 February 2024. Retrieved 3 August 2022.
20. ^ Jump up to:^a b Goldstein, Judith L.; Rivers, Douglas; Tomz, Michael (2007). “Institutions in International Relations: Understanding the Effects of the GATT and the WTO on World Trade”. International Organization. 61 (1): 37–67. doi:10.1017/S0020818307070014 (inactive 1 November 2024). ISSN 1531-5088.
21. ^ Jump up to:^a b Tomz, Michael; Goldstein, Judith L; Rivers, Douglas (2007). “Do We Really Know That the WTO Increases Trade? Comment”. American Economic Review. 97 (5): 2005–2018. doi:10.1257/aer.97.5.2005. ISSN 0002-8282.
22. ^ Jump up to:^a b Silva, Peri Agostinho; Nicita, Alessandro; Olarreaga, Marcelo (2018). “Cooperation in WTO’s Tariff Waters?” (PDF). Journal of Political Economy. 126 (3): 1302–1338. doi:10.1086/697085. ISSN 0022-3808. S2CID 152401600. Archived (PDF) from the original on 29 April 2019.
23. ^ Jump up to:^a b Allee, Todd; Elsig, Manfred; Lugg, Andrew (2017). “The Ties between the World Trade Organization and Preferential Trade Agreements: A Textual Analysis”. Journal of International Economic Law. 20 (2): 333–363. doi:10.1093/jiel/jgx009. ISSN 1369-3034.
24. ^ “Goal 10 targets”. UNDP. Archived from the original on 27 November 2020. Retrieved 23 September 2020.
25. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e} Joseph, Sarah; Joseph, Sarah Louise (2011). Blame it on the WTO?: A Human Rights Critique. OUP Oxford. pp. 164–167. ISBN 978-0-19-956589-4. Archived from the original on 14 February 2024. Retrieved 23 August 2020.
26. ^ Jump up to:^a b Wilkinson, Rorden (2014). What’s wrong with the WTO and how to fix it. Cambridge, UK: Polity. ISBN 978-0-745-67245-8. Archived from the original on 16 April 2021. Retrieved 12 September 2020.
27. ^
    • A. E. Eckes Jr., US Trade History, 73
    • A. Smithies, Reflections on the Work of Keynes, 578–601
    • N. Warren, Internet and Globalization, 193
28. ^ P. van den Bossche, The Law and Policy of the World Trade Organization, 80
29. ^ Palmeter-Mavroidis, Dispute Settlement, 2
30. ^ Fergusson, Ian F. (9 May 2007). “The World Trade Organization: Background and Issues” (PDF). Congressional Research Service. p. 4. Archived (PDF) from the original on 27 September 2013. Retrieved 15 August 2008.
31. ^ It was contemplated that the GATT would apply for several years until the ITO came into force. However, since the ITO never materialized, the GATT gradually became the focus for international governmental cooperation on trade matters, with economist Nicholas Halford overseeing the implementation of GATT in members’ policies. (P. van den Bossche, The Law and Policy of the World Trade Organization, 81; J. H. Jackson, Managing the Trading System, 134).
32. ^ “WTO | GATT bilateral negotiating material by Round”. World Trade Organization. Archived from the original on 30 July 2023. Retrieved 17 August 2023.
33. ^ “The GATT Years: from Havana to Marrakesh”. Archived 11 December 2004 at the Wayback Machine. World Trade Organization.
34. ^ Footer, M. E. Analysis of the World Trade Organization, 17.
35. ^ Jump up to:^a b P. Gallagher, The First Ten Years of the WTO, 4
36. ^ Jump up to:^a b “The Uruguay Round”. Archived 20 March 2007 at the Wayback Machine. World Trade Organization.
37. ^ Press Communiqué, Issues 1604–1664. General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade. 1994. p. 22. Archived from the original on 16 March 2023. Retrieved 16 March 2023. … the GATT has just completed its eighth—and by far the most ambitious—round of negotiations, the Uruguay Round, launched in September 1986 in Punta del Este, Uruguay.
38. ^ Gallagher, Peter (15 December 2005). “Looking back, looking forward”. The First Ten Years of the WTO: 1995–2005. Collected courses of the Academy of European Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 133. ISBN 9780521862158. Archived from the original on 14 February 2024. Retrieved 16 March 2023. The Uruguay Round had a four-year time frame when it was launched in 1986 …
39. ^ “Legal texts – Marrakesh agreement”. World Trade Organization. Archived from the original on 25 May 2010. Retrieved 30 May 2010.
40. ^ Erskine, Daniel (January 2004). “Resolving Trade Disputes, the Mechanisms of GATT/WTO Dispute Resolution”. Santa Clara Journal of International Law. 2 (1): 40. Archived from the original on 16 April 2016. Retrieved 3 April 2016.
41. ^“Overview: a Navigational Guide”. Archived 15 March 2007 at the Wayback Machine. World Trade Organization. For the complete list of “The Uruguay Round Agreements”, see:
    • “WTO legal texts”. Archived 14 December 2005 at the Wayback Machine. World Trade Organization.
    • “Uruguay Round Agreements, Understandings, Decisions and Declarations”. Archived 27 September 2007 at the Wayback Machine. WorldTradeLaw.net.
42. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Principles of the Trading System Archived 11 December 2004 at the Wayback Machine, WTO official site
43. ^ “Ministerial conferences – Eighth WTO Ministerial Conference”. World Trade Organization. Archived from the original on 13 September 2019. Retrieved 28 January 2017.
44. ^ Farah, Paolo Davide (4 August 2006). “Five Years of China WTO Membership. EU and US Perspectives about China’s Compliance with Transparency Commitments and the Transitional Review Mechanism”. Legal Issues of Economic Integration. 33 (3). Kluwer Law International: 263–304. doi:10.54648/LEIE2006016. SSRN 916768.
45. ^ “Ministerial conferences – Hong Kong 6th Ministerial”. World Trade Organization. Archived from the original on 24 January 2022. Retrieved 24 September 2020.
46. ^ “Ministerial conferences – Twelfth WTO Ministerial Conference – Geneva Switzerland”. World Trade Organization. Archived from the original on 21 August 2023. Retrieved 21 August 2023.
47. ^ “Members examine ‘road map’ for MC13 on the WTO’s reform of its deliberative function”. World Trade Organization. Archived from the original on 21 August 2023. Retrieved 21 August 2023.
48. ^ “Ministerial conferences”. World Trade Organization. Archived from the original on 6 March 2021. Retrieved 21 August 2023.
49. ^ “WTO 13th Ministerial Conference extended by one day to facilitate outcomes”. World Trade Organization. 29 February 2029.
50. ^ “In the twilight of Doha”. The Economist. 27 July 2006. p. 65. Archived from the original on 12 November 2007. Retrieved 21 May 2010.
51. ^ European Commission. “The Doha Round”. Archived 30 December 2011 at the Wayback Machine.
52. ^ Fergusson, Ian F. (18 January 2008). “World Trade Organization Negotiations: The Doha Development Agenda” (PDF). Congressional Research Service. Archived (PDF) from the original on 27 September 2013. Retrieved 26 July 2008.
53. ^ “Documents from the negotiating chairs, 21 April 2011”. Archived 10 October 2017 at the Wayback Machine. World Trade Organization.
54. ^ “Bali Ministerial Declaration and decisions”. Archived 18 December 2013 at the Wayback Machine. World Trade Organization. Accessed 31 December 2013.
55. ^ Walker, Andrew (7 December 2013). “WTO agrees global trade deal worth $1tn”. BBC News. Archived from the original on 7 December 2013. Retrieved 7 December 2013.
56. ^ “Understanding the WTO – The Doha agenda”. World Trade Organization. Archived from the original on 28 March 2019. Retrieved 28 March 2019.
57. ^ “The Challenges to the World Trade Organization: It’s All About Legitimacy”. Archived 2 May 2013 at the Wayback Machine. The Brookings Institution, Policy Paper 2011-04
58. ^ “Groups in the WTO”. Archived 10 November 2013 at the Wayback Machine. World Trade Organization. Updated 1 July 2013.
59. ^ “Functions of the WTO”. Archived 27 September 2007 at the Wayback Machine. IISD.
60. ^ Jump up to:^a b “Main Functions”. Archived 30 December 2006 at the Wayback Machine. World Trade Organization.
61. ^ Jump up to:^a b A Bredimas, International Economic Law, II, 17
62. ^ Jump up to:^a b C. Deere, “Decision-making in the WTO: Medieval or Up-to-Date?” Archived 9 December 2012 at archive.today. World Trade Organization
63. ^ “WTO Assistance for Developing Countries”. World Trade Organization. Archived 12 June 2015 at the Wayback Machine.
64. ^ Sinha, Aparijita. “What are the functions and objectives of the WTO?” Archived 15 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine. World Trade Organization. Retrieved on 13 April 2014.
65. ^ “Economic research and analysis”. Archived 15 March 2007 at the Wayback Machine. World Trade Organization.
66. ^ “WTO | Publications”. www.wto.org. Retrieved 8 April 2024.
67. ^ “WTO | Economic research and analysis gateway – World Trade Report”. www.wto.org. Retrieved 8 April 2024.
68. ^ “WTO | Economic research and analysis gateway – WTO Annual Report”. www.wto.org. Retrieved 8 April 2024.
69. ^ “WTO | Trade Statistics – World Trade Statistical Review”. www.wto.org. Retrieved 8 April 2024.
70. ^ Jump up to:^a b B. Hoekman, The WTO: Functions and Basic Principles, 42
71. ^ “WTO | Understanding the WTO – principles of the trading system”. www.wto.org. Retrieved 8 May 2024.
72. ^ Jump up to:^a b B. Hoekman, The WTO: Functions and Basic Principles, 43
73. ^ WTO, Schedules of concessions Archived 14 February 2024 at the Wayback Machine, accessed 10 January 2022
74. ^ Jump up to:^a b B. Hoekman, The WTO: Functions and Basic Principles, 44
75. ^ Jump up to:^a b “WTO – What is the WTO? – What we stand for”. www.wto.org. Archived from the original on 6 June 2019. Retrieved 28 March 2019.
76. ^ Farah, Paolo Davide and Cima, Elena, World Trade Organization, Renewable Energy Subsidies and the Case of Feed-In Tariffs: Time for Reform Toward Sustainable Development? (1 December 2015). Georgetown International Environmental Law Review (GIELR), Vol. 27, No. 1, 2015. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2704398 Archived 7 January 2023 at the Wayback Machine
77. ^ Jump up to:^a b “Whose WTO is it anyway?”. World Trade Organization. Archived from the original on 4 July 2021. Retrieved 24 June 2020.
78. ^ WTO, WTO members secure unprecedented package of trade outcomes at MC12 Archived 7 January 2023 at the Wayback Machine, published 17 June 2022, accessed 9 August 2022
79. ^ Jump up to:^a b “WTO Director-General selection process”. World Trade Organization. Archived from the original on 25 April 2021. Retrieved 24 June 2020.
80. ^ Jump up to:^a b “Fourth level: down to the nitty-gritty”. WTO official site. Archived from the original on 28 September 2008. Retrieved 18 August 2008.
81. ^ “Intellectual property – overview of TRIPS Agreement”. Wto.org. 15 April 1994. Archived from the original on 6 July 2010. Retrieved 30 May 2010.
82. ^ “The Services Council, its Committees and other subsidiary bodies”. WTO official site. Archived from the original on 29 September 2008. Retrieved 14 August 2008.
83. ^ “The Trade Negotiations Committee”. WTO official site. Archived from the original on 25 November 2005. Retrieved 14 August 2008.
84. ^ “WTO organization chart”. WTO official site. Archived from the original on 14 August 2008. Retrieved 14 August 2008.
85. ^ “Secretariat and budget overview”. WTO. 31 December 2022. Archived from the original on 16 May 2024. Retrieved 12 June 2024.
86. ^ Decision-making Archived 11 November 2011 at the Wayback Machine at WTO official site
87. ^ Decision-Making in the World Trade Organization Archived 25 August 2011 at the Wayback Machine Abstract from Journal of International Economic Law at Oxford Journals
88. ^ Steinberg, Richard H. “In the Shadow of Law or Power? Consensus-based Bargaining and Outcomes in the GATT/WTO.” International Organization. Spring 2002. pp. 339–374.
89. ^ “1.2 The Dispute Settlement Understanding”. WTO official website. 2005. Archived from the original on 17 March 2005. Retrieved 7 March 2005.
90. ^ Stewart-Dawyer, The WTO Dispute Settlement System, 7
91. ^ S. Panitchpakdi, The WTO at ten, 8.
92. ^ Settling Disputes:a Unique Contribution Archived 14 March 2007 at the Wayback Machine, WTO official site
93. ^ “3.3 Panels”. WTO official website. 2005. Archived from the original on 17 March 2005. Retrieved 7 March 2005.
94. ^ “3.1 The Dispute Settlement Body (DSB)”. WTO official website. 2005. Archived from the original on 7 April 2015. Retrieved 7 March 2015.
95. ^ “3.4 Appellate Body”. WTO official website. 2005. Archived from the original on 2 March 2005. Retrieved 7 March 2005.
96. ^ “3.2 The Director-General and the WTO Secretariat”. WTO official website. 2005. Archived from the original on 2 March 2005. Retrieved 7 March 2005.
97. ^ “3.5 arbitrators”. WTO official website. 2005. Archived from the original on 17 March 2005. Retrieved 7 March 2005.
98. ^ “3.6 Experts”. WTO official website. 2005. Archived from the original on 17 March 2005. Retrieved 7 March 2005.
99. ^ “”Mutually Agreed Solutions” as “Preferred Solution””. WTO official website. 2005. Archived from the original on 17 March 2005. Retrieved 7 March 2005.
100. ^ “1.3 Functions, objectives and key features of the dispute settlement system”. WTO official website. 2005. Archived from the original on 17 March 2005. Retrieved 7 March 2005.
101. ^ Jump up to:^a b Johns, Leslie; Pelc, Krzysztof J. (25 April 2018). “Free Riding on Enforcement in the World Trade Organization” (PDF). The Journal of Politics. 80 (3): 873–889. doi:10.1086/697463. ISSN 0022-3816. S2CID 67756781. Archived from the original (PDF) on 9 February 2020.
102. ^ Chaudoin, Stephen; Kucik, Jeffrey; Pelc, Krzysztof (15 April 2016). “Do WTO Disputes Actually Increase Trade?”. International Studies Quarterly. 60 (2): 294–306. doi:10.1093/isq/sqw009. ISSN 0020-8833. S2CID 56249395.
103. ^ “A US-less WTO: The first Middle East victims are oil exporters”. ameinfo.com. 2 September 2018. Archived from the original on 5 September 2018. Retrieved 5 September 2018.
104. ^ Hopewell, Kristen (3 July 2024). “The (surprise) return of development policy space in the multilateral trading system: what the WTO Appellate Body blockage means for the developmental state”. Review of International Political Economy. 31 (4): 1245–1270. doi:10.1080/09692290.2024.2303681. ISSN 0969-2290.
105. ^ Parliament, EU. “International trade dispute settlement: World Trade Organisation Appellate Body crisis and the multi-party interim appeal arbitration arrangement” (PDF). European Parliament. Retrieved 15 September 2024.
106. ^ Jump up to:^a b Accessions Summary Archived 3 February 2007 at the Wayback Machine, Center for International Development
107. ^ Ministerial Conference approves Russia’s WTO membership Archived 7 January 2012 at the Wayback Machine WTO News Item, 16 December 2011
108. ^ “Kazakhstan”. www.wto.org. Archived from the original on 25 April 2016. Retrieved 23 February 2016.
109. ^ Accession status: Vanuatu Archived 11 August 2012 at the Wayback Machine. WTO. Retrieved on 12 July 2013.
110. ^ C. Michalopoulos, WTO Accession, 64
111. ^ Jump up to:^a b Davis, Christina L.; Wilf, Meredith (10 May 2017). “Joining the Club: Accession to the GATT/WTO”. The Journal of Politics. 79 (3): 964–978. doi:10.1086/691058. ISSN 0022-3816. S2CID 152423155.
112. ^ “Summary Table of Ongoing Accessions”. World Trade Organization. April 2014. Archived from the original on 29 September 2014. Retrieved 25 October 2014.
113. ^ Jump up to:^a b Membership, Alliances and Bureaucracy Archived 16 March 2007 at the Wayback Machine, WTO official site
114. ^ C. Michalopoulos, WTO Accession, 62–63
115. ^ Armenia – WTO Archived 12 May 2019 at the Wayback Machine, www.wto.am
116. ^ Concluding remarks by the Chairperson Archived 12 May 2019 at the Wayback Machine, WTO official site
117. ^ How to Become a Member of the WTO Archived 13 March 2007 at the Wayback Machine, WTO official site
118. ^ Napier, Nancy K.; Vuong, Quan Hoang (2013). What we see, why we worry, why we hope: Vietnam going forward. Boise, ID: Boise State University CCI Press. p. 140. ISBN 978-0-9855305-8-7.
119. ^ “Members and Observers”. World Trade Organization. 24 August 2012. Archived from the original on 10 September 2011. Retrieved 10 September 2011.
120. ^ Jump up to:^a b “Ministers approve WTO membership of Comoros and Timor-Leste at MC13”. World Trade Organization. 26 February 2024. Retrieved 26 February 2024.
121. ^ “The European Union and the WTO”. World Trade Organization. Archived from the original on 24 June 2016. Retrieved 2 August 2016.
122. ^ Jackson, J.H. Sovereignty, 109
123. ^ “ROC Government Publication” (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 19 January 2012. Retrieved 12 June 2011.
124. ^ “Annex 1. Statistical Survey”. World Trade Organization. 2005. Archived from the original on 24 December 2013. Retrieved 22 December 2013.
125. ^ Arjomandy, Danial (21 November 2013). “Iranian Membership in the World Trade Organization: An Unclear Future”. Iranian Studies. 47 (6): 933–950. doi:10.1080/00210862.2013.859810. S2CID 162297876.
126. ^ International intergovernmental organizations granted observer status to WTO bodies Archived 12 March 2007 at the Wayback Machine at WTO official website
127. ^ “Legal texts – the WTO agreements”. WTO. Archived from the original on 24 May 2010. Retrieved 30 May 2010.
128. ^ Understanding the WTO – Intellectual property: protection and enforcement Archived 1 August 2013 at the Wayback Machine. WTO. Retrieved on 29 July 2013.
129. ^ “A Summary of the Final Act of the Uruguay Round”. Wto.org. Archived from the original on 24 May 2010. Retrieved 30 May 2010.
130. ^ Zarocostas, John (7 December 2013). “Global Trade Deal Reached”. WWD. Archived from the original on 11 December 2013. Retrieved 8 December 2013.
131. ^ “WT/L/509”. WTO. Archived from the original on 13 September 2019. Retrieved 18 February 2013.
132. ^ “Deputy Directors-General”. World Trade Organization. Archived from the original on 12 August 2017. Retrieved 6 November 2022.
133. ^ “Previous GATT and WTO Directors-General”. WTO. Archived from the original on 30 October 2012. Retrieved 21 May 2011.
134. ^ Beattie, Alan; Williams, Aime (14 May 2020). “WTO chief Roberto Azevêdo to step down early”. The Financial Times. Archived from the original on 10 December 2022.
135. ^ “Moon, allies intensify campaign for Yoo Myung-hee to head WTO”. Joongang Daily. 12 October 2020. Archived from the original on 13 October 2020.
136. ^ Baschuk, Bryce (28 October 2020). “U.S. Sows WTO Turmoil by Vetoing Front-Runner for Top Job”. Bloomberg. Archived from the original on 31 October 2020. Retrieved 28 October 2020.
137. ^ “History is made: Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala chosen as Director-General”. 15 February 2021. Archived from the original on 5 June 2021. Retrieved 26 May 2021.
138. ^ World Trade Organization (2023). WTO Annual Report 2023 (PDF). pp. 198–199. ISBN 978-92-870-7428-7. Retrieved 29 March 2024. {{cite book}}: |website= ignored (help)
139. ^ “How to Save Globilization From Its Cheerleaders” (PDF). 8 February 2016. p. 14. Archived (PDF) from the original on 8 February 2016. Retrieved 19 May 2020.
140. ^ Joseph, Sarah; Joseph, Sarah Louise (2011). Blame it on the WTO?: A Human Rights Critique. OUP Oxford. pp. 171–174. ISBN 978-0-19-956589-4. Archived from the original on 14 February 2024. Retrieved 23 August 2020.
141. ^ Chen, Natalie (2021). “Gravity and heterogeneous trade cost elasticities”. Economic Journal. 132 (644): 1349–1377. doi:10.1093/ej/ueab067. OCLC 1259290547.
142. ^ Goldstein, Judith; Gulotty, Robert (2021). “Trading Away Tariffs: The Operations of the GATT System”. World Trade Review. 21 (2): 135–158. doi:10.1017/S1474745621000458. ISSN 1474-7456. S2CID 239630296.
143. ^ Nicita, Alessandro; Olarreaga, Marcelo; Silva, Peri da (5 April 2018). “A trade war will increase average tariffs by 32 percentage points”. VoxEU.org. Archived from the original on 27 April 2018. Retrieved 27 April 2018.
144. ^ Bechtel, Michael M.; Sattler, Thomas (2015). “What Is Litigation in the World Trade Organization Worth?”. International Organization. 69 (2): 375–403. doi:10.1017/S002081831400037X. ISSN 0020-8183. S2CID 232251704.
145. ^ Shin, Wonkyu; Ahn, Dukgeun (2019). “Trade Gains from Legal Rulings in the WTO Dispute Settlement System”. World Trade Review. 18 (1): 1–31. doi:10.1017/S1474745617000544. ISSN 1474-7456.
146. ^ Bown, Chad P. (2004). “On the Economic Success of GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement”. The Review of Economics and Statistics. 86 (3): 811–823. doi:10.1162/0034653041811680. S2CID 28108505. Archived from the original on 24 March 2020. Retrieved 24 March 2020.
147. ^ Bown, Chad P. (2004). “Trade Policy under the GATT/WTO: Empirical Evidence of the Equal Treatment Rule”. The Canadian Journal of Economics. 37 (3): 678–720. doi:10.1111/j.0008-4085.2004.00243.x. ISSN 0008-4085. JSTOR 3696011. S2CID 5705448.