The issue of nuclear weapons on British soil has resurfaced, prompting fresh calls from the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (CND) for transparency. In a letter addressed to both the UK Prime Minister and the Defence Secretary, the CND has demanded clarification on whether RAF Lakenheath, located in Suffolk, is housing the newly deployed B61-12 nuclear bombs.

This call for disclosure follows a recent confirmation by a senior American official, who announced that the deployment of a new generation of nuclear bombs—the B61-12—had been completed. The B61-12 bombs are part of the United States’ efforts to modernize its nuclear arsenal, which includes a range of advanced warheads designed to replace older models.

However, the UK government, along with NATO, has adhered to a policy of “neither confirm nor deny” when it comes to the presence of nuclear weapons at specific locations. This policy, which has been in place for decades, seeks to avoid public acknowledgment or denial of nuclear armament at particular sites.

The CND’s request has sparked a renewed debate over nuclear transparency and disarmament. While some advocates argue that public disclosure of nuclear weapon stockpiles is a vital step toward achieving disarmament, others assert that such revelations could jeopardize national security and stability, particularly given the sensitive nature of military alliances and deterrence strategies.

As the UK government faces mounting pressure, the issue of nuclear weapons on British soil remains a key topic of discussion, particularly in the context of ongoing efforts to modernize and maintain military capabilities within NATO.

In a speech delivered last week, Jill Hruby, the administrator of the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), confirmed the full deployment of the B61-12 gravity bombs, stating that they are now “fully forward deployed.” This marks a significant milestone in the modernization of the United States’ nuclear capabilities and strengthens its commitment to NATO’s nuclear deterrence posture.

Hruby emphasized that the deployment of the B61-12 bombs enhances NATO’s visibility and understanding of the nuclear capabilities available to the alliance. These advanced thermonuclear bombs, which are part of the U.S.’s strategic nuclear arsenal, are now stationed at various locations within NATO’s territory, particularly at RAF Lakenheath in Suffolk, United Kingdom.

The B61-12 is a versatile and sophisticated bomb that can be carried by advanced aircraft like the F-35A Lightning II, which is stationed at RAF Lakenheath. This weapon’s forward deployment is seen as a demonstration of the U.S.’s continued support for NATO’s security and its commitment to maintaining a robust nuclear deterrent in Europe.

The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), which is responsible for ensuring the safety, security, and effectiveness of the U.S. nuclear weapons stockpile, plays a crucial role in the maintenance and modernization of these weapons. The successful deployment of the B61-12 is part of a broader effort to modernize the U.S. nuclear arsenal, which includes improving bomb designs, delivery systems, and other related technologies.

The presence of these new gravity bombs in Europe is significant in the context of NATO’s collective defense strategy, especially as global security dynamics evolve. While NATO and the U.S. have a longstanding policy of neither confirming nor denying the presence of nuclear weapons at specific locations, the acknowledgment of the B61-12’s deployment further underscores the importance of maintaining a credible nuclear deterrent in the face of emerging security challenges.

Documents from the US Department of Defense have revealed that $50 million is being allocated to construct new facilities at RAF Lakenheath, referred to as “surety dormitories.” These structures are believed to be linked to the storage and handling of nuclear weapons, with some experts suggesting that their construction points to the imminent arrival of such weapons at the base. The Federation of American Scientists has also indicated that these developments could signify preparations for the deployment of nuclear warheads at RAF Lakenheath.

Furthermore, another document, which was seen by the BBC but later removed from the internet, mentioned related work at the base in preparation for its “upcoming nuclear mission.” This document hinted at the base’s role in NATO’s nuclear deterrence strategy and further bolstered the claim that nuclear weapons were being reintroduced to the facility. It is important to note that RAF Lakenheath had previously hosted US nuclear weapons until their withdrawal in 2008, making the recent developments significant.

While the US and NATO have long adhered to a policy of not disclosing specific details regarding the number and locations of nuclear weapons stationed in Europe, estimates from independent organizations provide some insight. The Washington-based Center for Arms Proliferation and Control has estimated that approximately 100 nuclear warheads are stored across five countries in Europe. These warheads are believed to be part of NATO’s nuclear deterrent strategy, intended to reassure allies of the alliance’s commitment to collective defense.

The construction of new facilities at RAF Lakenheath, coupled with the documents detailing preparations for a nuclear mission, has led to renewed discussions about the US’s nuclear presence in Europe and the broader implications for NATO’s security posture. The potential reintroduction of nuclear weapons to the base underscores the ongoing importance of nuclear deterrence in the face of shifting geopolitical tensions.

Security risks

In a recent letter to the UK government, Sophie Bolt, the general secretary of the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (CND), expressed grave concerns about the potential presence of US nuclear weapons at RAF Lakenheath. She referred to statements made by Jill Hruby, the administrator of the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), suggesting that the new B61-12 gravity bombs had been fully forward deployed, which implied that such weapons could now be stationed in the UK.

Bolt highlighted the lack of communication with local communities regarding the new security risks that such a deployment might bring. She stated that the presence of US nuclear weapons at RAF Lakenheath could significantly increase the threat not only to the communities surrounding the base but to the entire UK, as it could potentially place Britain at the heart of a nuclear conflict between the US and NATO.

The letter further emphasized that the public has a fundamental right to be informed about the risks associated with such a deployment. Bolt argued that the people of Britain should have the opportunity to express their opposition to the presence of nuclear weapons on their soil and to voice their concerns regarding the implications of being part of the US/NATO nuclear front line.

The CND’s letter calls for transparency from the government about the deployment of nuclear weapons, stressing that these decisions should involve public discourse and input from the communities directly affected by them.

In November, the US Air Force acknowledged the presence of unidentified drones flying over three of its airbases in the UK, including RAF Lakenheath. However, details about the origin or intentions of these drones have not been disclosed. The Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (CND) has expressed serious concerns over these drone sightings, believing that they escalate the risks associated with the base, especially given the potential presence of nuclear weapons.

Sophie Bolt, the general secretary of CND, warned that the combination of drones and aircraft carrying nuclear materials could lead to catastrophic consequences. She highlighted the possibility of drones causing accidents or even leading to a crash of an aircraft near where nuclear weapons are stored, which could have devastating results. According to Bolt, these drone sightings add another layer of security risk to an already sensitive and potentially hazardous situation at RAF Lakenheath.

The CND has called for greater transparency and security measures to address these emerging threats, urging the government and military authorities to take the potential risks seriously and prevent any accidents that could jeopardize public safety and international security.

COURTESY: euronews

References

• ^ “Final Communiqué”. www.nato.int. 17 September 1949. Archived from the original on 6 December 2006. Retrieved 2 March 2024. English and French shall be the official languages for the entire North Atlantic Treaty Organization.
• ^ NATO (4 April 1949). “The North Atlantic Treaty”. NATO. Archived from the original on 14 September 2011. Retrieved 2 March 2024. This Treaty, of which the English and French texts are equally authentic.
• ^ NATO. “Mark Rutte takes office as NATO Secretary General”. NATO. Retrieved 1 October 2024.
• ^ “Defence Expenditure of NATO Countries (2014–2024)” (PDF). NATO.
• ^ Jump up to:^a b “What is NATO?”. NATO – Homepage. n.d. Archived from the original on 28 February 2022. Retrieved 3 March 2022.
• ^ Cook, Lorne (25 May 2017). “NATO, the world’s biggest military alliance, explained”. Military Times. Associated Press. Archived from the original on 25 May 2017. Retrieved 3 March 2022.
• ^ “Animus in consulendo liber”. NATO. Archived from the original on 9 January 2017. Retrieved 23 March 2015.
• ^ Szenes, Zoltan (2023). “Szenes, Zoltan. “Reinforcing deterrence: assessing NATO’s 2022 Strategic Concept.” Defense & Security Analysis 39.4 (2023): 539–560″. Defense & Security Analysis. 39 (4). doi:10.1080/14751798.2023.2270230.
• ^ “NATO to accelerate deployment of up to 300,000 soldiers on eastern border”. Ukrainska Pravda. Archived from the original on 19 March 2023. Retrieved 14 June 2023.
• ^ Batchelor, Tom (9 March 2022). “Where are Nato troops stationed and how many are deployed across Europe?”. The Independent. Archived from the original on 8 June 2022. Retrieved 8 June 2022.
• ^ “[1] Archived 9 March 2024 at the Wayback Machine.” worlddata.info. Retrieved on 15 September 2024. “Members of the NATO: North Atlantic Treaty Organization.”
• ^ “World military expenditure reaches new record high as European spending surges”. SIPRI. 24 April 2023. Archived from the original on 28 April 2023. Retrieved 29 April 2023.
• ^ NATO. “The Wales Declaration on the Transatlantic Bond”. NATO. Archived from the original on 10 June 2018. Retrieved 2 March 2024.
• ^ Erlanger, Steven (26 March 2014). “Europe Begins to Rethink Cuts to Military Spending”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on 29 March 2014. Retrieved 3 April 2014. Last year, only a handful of NATO countries met the target, according to NATO figures, including the United States, at 4.1 percent, and Britain, at 2.4 percent.
• ^ Jump up to:^a b “Notification Reference No. 2024-008” (PDF). United States Department of State. 7 March 2024. Archived (PDF) from the original on 7 March 2024. Retrieved 7 March 2024.
• ^ “Biden, Johnson sign new Atlantic Charter on trade, defense amid Covid recovery”. NBC News. 10 June 2021. Retrieved 10 June 2021.
• ^ “The origins of WEU: Western Union”. University of Luxembourg. December 2009. Archived from the original on 21 June 2018. Retrieved 23 July 2018.
• ^ “A short history of NATO”. NATO. Archived from the original on 26 March 2017. Retrieved 26 March 2017.
• ^ “Canada and NATO – 1949”. Archived from the original on 8 April 2022. Retrieved 14 April 2022.
• ^ Findley, Paul (2011). Speaking Out: A Congressman’s Lifelong Fight Against Bigotry, Famine, and War. Chicago Review Press, Incorporated. ISBN 9781569768914. Archived from the original on 4 April 2023. Retrieved 24 April 2022.
• ^ The McGraw-Hill Encyclopedia of World Biography: An International Reference Work. McGraw-Hill. 1973. ISBN 9780070796331. Archived from the original on 4 April 2023. Retrieved 24 April 2022.
• ^ Ismay, Hastings (4 September 2001). “NATO the first five years 1949–1954”. NATO. Archived from the original on 15 March 2017. Retrieved 10 April 2012.
• ^ Baldwin, Hanson (28 September 1952). “Navies Meet the Test in Operation Mainbrace”. New York Times: E7. Archived from the original on 10 October 2017. Retrieved 10 April 2012.
• ^ “NATO: The Man with the Oilcan”. Time. 24 March 1952. Archived from the original on 8 January 2012. Retrieved 17 January 2012.
• ^ Glass, Andrew (14 May 2014). “Soviet Union establishes Warsaw Pact, May 14, 1955”. Politico. Archived from the original on 24 September 2022. Retrieved 10 June 2022.
• ^ Olmsted, Dan (September 2020). “Should the United States Keep Troops in Germany?”. National WW2 Museum. Archived from the original on 25 January 2021. Retrieved 22 February 2021.
• ^ van der Eyden 2003, pp. 104–106.
• ^ Jump up to:^a b c Cody, Edward (12 March 2009). “After 43 Years, France to Rejoin NATO as Full Member”. The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 26 October 2017. Retrieved 19 December 2011.
• ^ “Spain and NATO”. Country Studies US. Source: U.S. Library of Congress. Archived from the original on 15 April 2021. Retrieved 10 April 2021.
• ^ Harding, Luke (14 July 2007). “Kremlin tears up arms pact with Nato”. The Observer. Archived from the original on 31 August 2013. Retrieved 1 May 2012.
• ^ Kimball, Daryl (August 2017). “The Conventional Armed Forces in Europe (CFE) Treaty and the Adapted CFE Treaty at a Glance”. Arms Control Association. Archived from the original on 24 February 2021. Retrieved 22 February 2021.
• ^ Techau, Jan (2 September 2015). “The Politics of 2 Percent: NATO and the Security Vacuum in Europe”. Carnegie Europe. Archived from the original on 23 September 2018. Retrieved 22 February 2021.
• ^ Eichler, Jan (2021). NATO’s Expansion After the Cold War: Geopolitics and Impacts for International Security. Springer Nature. pp. 34, 35. ISBN 9783030666415.
• ^ “Declassified documents show security assurances against NATO expansion to Soviet leaders from Baker, Bush, Genscher, Kohl, Gates, Mitterrand, Thatcher, Hurd, Major, and Woerner”. National Security Archive. 12 December 2017. Archived from the original on 23 December 2019. Retrieved 3 March 2022.
• ^ Wiegrefe, Klaus (18 February 2022). “Neuer Aktenfund von 1991 stützt russischen Vorwurf”. Der Spiegel. Archived from the original on 3 March 2022. Retrieved 3 March 2022.
• ^ Baker, Peter (9 January 2022). “In Ukraine Conflict, Putin Relies on a Promise That Ultimately Wasn’t”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on 1 March 2022. Retrieved 3 March 2022.
• ^ “NATO Announces Special 70th Anniversary Summit In London In December”. Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. 6 February 2019. Archived from the original on 6 April 2019. Retrieved 6 April 2019.
• ^ Jing Ke (2008). “Did the US Media Reflect the Reality of the Kosovo War in an Objective Manner? A Case Study of The Washington Post and The Washington Times” (PDF). University of Rhode Island. Archived from the original (PDF) on 23 March 2019.
• ^ NATO. “Relations with the Republic of North Macedonia (Archived)”. NATO. Archived from the original on 10 March 2015. Retrieved 16 February 2022.
• ^ “Invocation of Article 5 confirmed”. North Atlantic Treaty Organization. 3 October 2001. Archived from the original on 30 December 2012. Retrieved 29 January 2013.
• ^ “Counter-piracy operations”. North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Archived from the original on 26 May 2011. Retrieved 27 May 2011.
• ^ Jump up to:^a b Stratton, Allegra (17 June 2008). “Sarkozy military plan unveiled”. The Guardian. UK. Archived from the original on 7 March 2016. Retrieved 17 December 2016.
• ^ “Defence Planning Committee (DPC) (Archived)”. NATO. 11 November 2014. Archived from the original on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 13 August 2016.
• ^ “Statement by the North Atlantic Council following meeting under article 4 of the Washington Treaty”. NATO Newsroom. 4 March 2014. Archived from the original on 10 March 2014. Retrieved 2 April 2014.
• ^ “The consultation process and Article 4”. NATO. 24 February 2022. Archived from the original on 2 April 2022. Retrieved 3 April 2022.
• ^ Techau, Jan (2 September 2015). “The Politics of 2 Percent: NATO and the Security Vacuum in Europe”. Carnegie Europe. Archived from the original on 12 July 2018. Retrieved 11 July 2018. A month before [the alliance’s summit in Riga in 2006], Victoria Nuland, then the U.S. ambassador to NATO, called the 2 percent metric the “unofficial floor” on defence spending in NATO. But never had all governments of NATO’s 28 nations officially embraced it at the highest possible political level – a summit declaration.
• ^ Jump up to:^a b “NATO’s military presence in the east of the Alliance”. NATO. 28 March 2022. Archived from the original on 31 March 2022. Retrieved 3 April 2022.
• ^ McLeary, Paul; Toosi, Nahal (11 February 2022). “U.S. sending 3,000 more troops to Poland amid fresh Ukraine invasion warnings”. Politico. Archived from the original on 22 February 2022. Retrieved 3 April 2022.
• ^ “Spain sends warships to Black Sea, considers sending warplanes”. Reuters. 21 January 2022. Archived from the original on 22 January 2022. Retrieved 3 April 2022.
• ^ “Spain will send four fighter jets and 130 troops to Bulgaria”. Reuters. 9 February 2022. Archived from the original on 14 February 2022. Retrieved 3 April 2022.
• ^ “NATO, G7, EU leaders display unity, avoid confrontation with Russia”. Deutsche Welle. 25 March 2022. Archived from the original on 3 April 2022. Retrieved 3 April 2022.
• ^ Gonzalez, Oriana (26 February 2022). “NATO Response Force deploys for first time”. Axios. Archived from the original on 20 March 2022. Retrieved 3 April 2022.
• ^ “NATO BOOSTS FORCES IN EAST TO DETER RUSSIAN MENACE”. BIRN. Balkan Insight. Balkan Investigative Reporting Network. 14 June 2022. Archived from the original on 15 June 2022. Retrieved 15 June 2022.
• ^ Jump up to:^a b “NATO’s Operations 1949–Present” (PDF). NATO. 2009. Archived from the original (PDF) on 1 March 2013. Retrieved 3 March 2013.
• ^ Zenko 2010, pp. 133–134.
• ^ Zenko 2010, p. 134.
• ^ NATO Handbook: Evolution of the Conflict, NATO, archived from the original on 7 November 2001
• ^ UN Document A/54/549, Report of the Secretary-General pursuant to General Assembly resolution 53/35: The fall of Srebrenica, un.org, Archived 12 September 2009 at the Wayback Machine, accessed 25 April 2015.
• ^ Bethlehem & Weller 1997, p. liiv.
• ^ Jump up to:^a b Zenko 2010, pp. 137–138
• ^ Clausson 2006, pp. 94–97.
• ^ Tice, Jim (22 February 2009). “Thousands more now eligible for NATO Medal”. Army Times. Archived from the original on 7 September 2012. Retrieved 11 April 2012.
• ^ “Nato to strike Yugoslavia”. BBC News. 24 March 1999. Archived from the original on 26 September 2015. Retrieved 25 September 2015.
• ^ Thorpe, Nick (24 March 2004). “UN Kosovo mission walks a tightrope”. BBC News. Archived from the original on 26 July 2012. Retrieved 11 April 2012.
• ^ “The Kosovo refugee crisis” (PDF). United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. 19 December 2005. Archived (PDF) from the original on 23 July 2023. Retrieved 23 July 2023.
• ^ “NATO reaffirms power to take action without UN approval”. CNN. 24 April 1999. Archived from the original on 28 January 2015. Retrieved 4 September 2013.
• ^ “Allied Command Atlantic”. NATO Handbook. NATO. Archived from the original on 13 August 2008. Retrieved 3 September 2008.
• ^ “Kosovo Report Card”. International Crisis Group. 28 August 2000. Archived from the original on 4 March 2012. Retrieved 11 April 2012.
• ^ Helm, Toby (27 September 2001). “Macedonia mission a success, says Nato”. The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on 5 September 2012. Retrieved 11 April 2012.
• ^ “NATO’s role in Kosovo”. NATO. 10 July 2023. Archived from the original on 26 June 2023. Retrieved 23 July 2023.
• ^ Münch, Philipp (2021). “Creating common sense: Getting NATO to Afghanistan”. Journal of Transatlantic Studies. 19 (2): 138–166. doi:10.1057/s42738-021-00067-0. ISSN 1479-4012.
• ^ “NATO Update: Invocation of Article 5 confirmed”. NATO. 2 October 2001. Archived from the original on 25 August 2010. Retrieved 22 August 2010.
• ^ “NATO takes historic step into Afghanistan”. Al Jazeera. Reuters. 11 August 2003. Archived from the original on 23 July 2023. Retrieved 23 July 2023.
• ^ “UNSC Resolution 1510, October 13, 2003” (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 October 2010. Retrieved 5 July 2010.
• ^ “ISAF Chronology”. NATO. Archived from the original on 13 November 2010. Retrieved 5 July 2010.
• ^ Morales, Alex (5 October 2006). “NATO Takes Control of East Afghanistan From U.S.-Led Coalition”. Bloomberg L.P. Archived from the original on 24 July 2014. Retrieved 4 September 2013.
• ^ “La France et l’OTAN”. Le Monde (in French). France. Archived from the original on 12 October 2007. Retrieved 16 July 2011.
• ^ “NATO sets “irreversible” but risky course to end Afghan war”. Reuters. Reuters. 21 May 2012. Archived from the original on 22 October 2012. Retrieved 22 May 2012.
• ^ Rasmussen, Sune Engel (28 December 2014). “Nato ends combat operations in Afghanistan”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on 2 January 2015. Retrieved 24 October 2019.
• ^ “NATO to Cut Forces in Afghanistan, Match US Withdrawal”. VOA News. 14 April 2021. Archived from the original on 15 April 2021. Retrieved 17 August 2021.
• ^ “Afghanistan stunned by scale and speed of security forces’ collapse”. The Guardian. 13 July 2021. Archived from the original on 15 August 2021. Retrieved 17 August 2021.
• ^ “Taliban surge in Afghanistan: EU and NATO in state of shock”. Deutsche Welle. 16 August 2021. Archived from the original on 17 August 2021. Retrieved 17 August 2021.
• ^ “Afghanistan takeover sparks concern from NATO allies”. Deutsche Welle. 16 August 2021. Archived from the original on 19 August 2021. Retrieved 19 August 2021.
• ^ “Migration fears complicate Europe’s response to Afghanistan crisis”. Politico. 16 August 2021. Archived from the original on 19 August 2021. Retrieved 19 August 2021.
• ^ “Official Website”. Jfcnaples.nato.int. Archived from the original on 12 December 2011. Retrieved 29 January 2013.
• ^ El Gamal, Rania (17 December 2011). “NATO closes up training mission in Iraq”. Reuters. Archived from the original on 18 December 2011. Retrieved 17 January 2012.
• ^ Croft, Adrian (3 October 2012). “NATO demands halt to Syria aggression against Turkey”. Reuters. Archived from the original on 4 October 2012. Retrieved 3 October 2012.
• ^ Ford, Dana (26 July 2015). “Turkey calls for rare NATO talks after attacks along Syrian border”. Cnn.com. CNN. Archived from the original on 27 July 2015. Retrieved 26 July 2015.
• ^ “Operation Allied Provider”. Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe. 30 September 2014. Archived from the original on 14 November 2016. Retrieved 4 April 2024.
• ^ “Operation Ocean Shield”. NATO. Archived from the original on 13 May 2011. Retrieved 3 March 2011.
• ^ “2009 Operation Ocean Shield News Articles”. NATO. October 2010. Archived from the original on 29 April 2011. Retrieved 19 May 2011.
• ^ “Operation Ocean Shield purpose”. 12 July 2016. Archived from the original on 13 September 2016. Retrieved 27 September 2016.
• ^ “Counter-piracy operations (2008-2016)”. NATO. Archived from the original on 12 July 2024. Retrieved 8 August 2024.
• ^ “Security Council Approves ‘No-Fly Zone’ over Libya, Authorizing ‘All Necessary Measures’ to Protect Civilians, by Vote of 10 in Favour with 5 Abstentions”. United Nations Meetings Coverage and Press Releases. 17 March 2011. Archived from the original on 9 July 2024. Retrieved 8 August 2024.
• ^ Anrig, Christian F. (2011). “Allied Air Power over Libya: A Preliminary Assessment”. Air & Space Power Journal. 25 (4): 1.
• ^ Jump up to:^a b “Statement by the NATO Secretary General on Libya arms embargo”. NATO. 22 March 2011. Archived from the original on 28 April 2011. Retrieved 25 March 2011.
• ^ “Press briefing by NATO Spokesperson Oana Lungescu, Brigadier General Pierre St-Amand, Canadian Air Force and General Massimo Panizzi, spokesperson of the Chairman of the Military Committee”. NATO. 23 March 2011. Archived from the original on 28 April 2011. Retrieved 25 March 2011.
• ^ “NATO reaches deal to take over Libya operation; allied planes hit ground forces”. Washington Post. 25 March 2011. Archived from the original on 17 February 2013.
• ^ “NATO to police Libya no-fly zone”. English.aljazeera.net. 24 March 2011. Archived from the original on 26 March 2011. Retrieved 25 March 2011.
• ^ O’Sullivan, Arieh (31 March 2011). “UAE and Qatar pack an Arab punch in Libya operation”. Jerusalem Post. se. Archived from the original on 6 November 2012. Retrieved 29 January 2013.
• ^