NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg has called on the alliance’s members to adopt a “wartime mindset” in response to the growing security threats, particularly from Russia. In his remarks, Stoltenberg emphasized the need for NATO countries to drastically increase defense spending and invest in military preparedness, warning that the current level of investment was insufficient to confront the potential of a large-scale conflict.

The NATO chief highlighted the evolving security landscape in Europe and beyond, stressing that NATO must be ready for the challenges of the future. With Russia’s continued military expansion and aggressive actions, particularly in Ukraine, Stoltenberg cautioned that NATO could no longer operate under the assumption of peace.

“Now is the time to shift our focus from peacetime to wartime,” Stoltenberg said, addressing NATO’s members at a summit. “The threats are real, and our defense posture must reflect that.” He also underscored that NATO’s ability to protect its members would be directly impacted by their commitment to defense spending.

Many NATO countries have been criticized for not meeting the alliance’s defense spending target of 2% of GDP, which Stoltenberg noted as inadequate given the current geopolitical environment. He argued that the alliance’s success in deterring aggression depended on bolstering its military capabilities, modernizing forces, and ensuring that NATO’s deterrence strategy was up to the task of facing a sophisticated adversary like Russia.

Stoltenberg’s remarks come amid a backdrop of heightened tensions with Russia, with Moscow’s military actions in Ukraine and other parts of Eastern Europe continuing to raise alarms. NATO, which has already deployed troops in some Eastern European countries, is looking to enhance its defensive capabilities and strengthen its collective security measures in the face of a potential broader conflict.

The call to prepare for a wartime scenario is expected to push NATO members to reassess their defense strategies and reconsider their military investments. It is a stark reminder of the changing security dynamics and the need for greater cooperation and defense spending to secure peace and stability in the face of growing threats.

NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg, alongside Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte, warned that Moscow is preparing for a long-term confrontation, not just with Ukraine, but with NATO itself. Rutte described the current security situation as the most severe of his lifetime, highlighting the deepening crisis in Europe due to Russia’s actions.

COURTESY: WION

Rutte’s remarks underscore the gravity of the situation, with the Netherlands’ Prime Minister emphasizing that Russia’s continued aggression and its military buildup signal a prolonged and escalating conflict. He warned that NATO must be ready for a sustained confrontation, and the alliance must remain united and vigilant in its defense commitments.

“The challenge we face is not a short-term threat,” Rutte stated. “Moscow is preparing for a prolonged and long-term confrontation with Ukraine and with all of us. The security environment we are in today is the most dangerous and destabilizing of my lifetime.”

This stark warning underscores NATO’s shifting priorities and its call for member countries to bolster defense spending and readiness. The alliance is adjusting to the reality that Russia’s actions in Ukraine may not only persist for years, but could potentially escalate, requiring NATO to adopt a far more proactive and resilient stance in the face of increasing global instability.

In his first major speech since assuming the role of NATO Secretary General in October, Jens Stoltenberg issued a stark warning to member states, urging them to “turbocharge” their defense spending. He emphasized that NATO is currently not adequately prepared for the challenges that lie ahead in the next four to five years.

“We are not ready for what is coming our way in four to five years,” Stoltenberg said, acknowledging the pressing need for rapid modernization and expansion of military capabilities. His comments reflect the urgency of the situation as NATO faces an increasingly aggressive Russia and the growing instability in the region.

Stoltenberg’s call to action comes amid concerns over the alliance’s long-term readiness. While NATO has already bolstered its response to the immediate threat posed by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the Secretary General stressed that future security threats will require a sustained, comprehensive effort from all member nations. NATO must not only meet the current challenges but also prepare for an evolving and uncertain geopolitical landscape.

To stay ahead of emerging threats, Stoltenberg urged member countries to significantly increase their defense budgets and invest in advanced military technologies. The call for a “wartime mindset” underscores NATO’s need for a paradigm shift towards prioritizing defense, readiness, and long-term strategic planning in a rapidly changing world.

NATO members have committed to spending at least 2% of their GDP on defense annually by 2024, a target set during the alliance’s summit in Wales in 2014. This pledge aims to ensure that NATO has the necessary resources to maintain its military readiness and capabilities in the face of growing security challenges, particularly from Russia and other emerging threats.

However, many member states have struggled to meet this target, with several countries falling short of the required defense spending. The U.S. has consistently been the largest contributor to NATO’s budget, but European allies have faced pressure to increase their defense investments in order to share the burden more equitably.

COURTESY: Capsule Productions

Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg has urged members to fulfill their commitments and to “turbocharge” their defense spending to address the evolving security landscape. With increasing concerns over potential threats from Russia and the need for NATO to modernize its military forces, the alliance’s ability to meet this defense spending target is critical to its long-term effectiveness and stability.

Speaking at an event in Brussels, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, the former Dutch prime minister, emphasized the urgency of increasing defense spending among member nations. He stated that the current 2% GDP target, while a step in the right direction, is insufficient in the face of growing threats. “A lot more will be needed,” he warned, as the danger from adversaries such as Russia “moves towards us at full speed.” Rutte stressed that NATO must transition into a “wartime mindset” and accelerate preparations for long-term confrontation, highlighting the need for enhanced military capabilities and readiness.

His comments reflect the escalating security concerns following Russia’s aggressive actions in Ukraine and its broader strategic ambitions in Europe. Rutte’s call for a significant increase in defense spending aligns with NATO’s need to modernize its forces, improve deterrence, and ensure the alliance remains capable of responding to future challenges. As NATO approaches its 2024 defense spending target deadline, Rutte’s remarks underscore the importance of proactive and substantial investments in defense, particularly as the geopolitical landscape becomes increasingly unstable.

Mark Rutte pointed out that during the Cold War, European NATO members spent as much as 3% of their GDP on defense, a level he believes should be revisited in light of the current security challenges. He argued that the geopolitical environment today—marked by Russia’s aggression and the ongoing conflict in Ukraine—demands a similar, if not greater, commitment to military spending.

Rutte emphasized that NATO must not be complacent or rely on outdated assumptions about security. As tensions escalate, he warned that the alliance must be prepared for a prolonged period of instability, requiring significantly enhanced military capabilities and a shift in mindset towards long-term readiness. This includes substantial increases in defense budgets, modernizing defense infrastructure, and enhancing the interoperability of NATO forces. By returning to higher defense spending levels, Rutte suggested, Europe could ensure the alliance is adequately equipped to deter threats and maintain security on the continent.

Rutte warned that if NATO members do not increase their defense spending now, they will face a far greater cost in the future. “If we don’t spend more together now to prevent war, we will pay a much, much, much higher price later to fight it,” he stated. This stark warning emphasized the urgent need for proactive investment in defense to prevent conflicts from escalating into full-scale wars. He stressed that the cost of prevention—through deterrence and preparedness—pales in comparison to the devastating economic and human toll that would result from a future conflict, particularly one involving major powers like Russia. Rutte’s message underscored the importance of collective action within NATO to address emerging threats before they materialize into full-blown wars.

Rutte also highlighted the growing military capabilities of Russia, stating that the country’s economy was “on a war footing.” He pointed out that by 2025, Russia’s defense spending would constitute “a third of Russia’s state budget”—a level not seen since the Cold War. This shift in Russia’s priorities underscores the growing threat posed by the country as it continues to bolster its military capacity. Rutte emphasized the need for NATO to be equally prepared and proactive, stressing that the alliance must not be caught off guard by Russia’s escalating military investments. This warning serves as a call to action for NATO members to enhance their defense capabilities to ensure a strong deterrence against potential aggression.

COURTESY: Channel 4 News

Since launching its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Russia has significantly ramped up its defense spending, with record levels approved for 2025. This increase is part of a broader strategy to strengthen its military capabilities in response to the ongoing conflict and to prepare for what Moscow perceives as a prolonged confrontation with NATO and Ukraine. The surge in funding underscores Russia’s commitment to its military objectives and its readiness to sustain the war effort for the long term, prompting NATO members to reassess their own defense strategies and spending to ensure they remain adequately prepared for potential escalation.

Rutte spoke at a critical juncture in the war in Ukraine, as Russian forces made significant advances in the east of the country. By November 2024, Moscow had seized six times as much Ukrainian territory in the year compared to the entirety of 2023. This rapid territorial gain highlighted the growing intensity of the conflict and underscored the urgency of NATO’s preparedness for potential further escalation. Rutte’s remarks emphasized the need for the alliance to bolster its defense capabilities in response to Russia’s increasing military momentum, signaling that the stakes for both Ukraine and NATO were higher than ever.

While the average defense spending for NATO members in Europe and Canada is estimated at 2% of GDP, not all countries meet the target. Several NATO members continue to fall short of the defense spending goal, with some nations contributing significantly less than the required 2%. This discrepancy has been a point of contention within the alliance, as it raises concerns about the collective defense capabilities of NATO, especially in light of the growing threat from Russia. Secretary General Mark Rutte’s call for increased spending underscores the importance of all members fulfilling their commitments to ensure the alliance remains strong and capable of addressing future challenges.

In February, former U.S. President Donald Trump made controversial remarks, suggesting that he would “encourage” Russia to attack any NATO member that fails to meet its defense spending commitments. Trump’s statement, which drew significant criticism, reflected his longstanding stance that NATO allies should bear a fair share of the financial burden. He had previously expressed dissatisfaction with certain NATO members’ lack of spending on defense, arguing that the U.S. should not be expected to shoulder a disproportionate share of the alliance’s security costs. The comments highlighted ongoing tensions within NATO regarding defense spending, as well as Trump’s broader approach to international relations and alliances.

NATO’s principle of collective defense is enshrined in Article 5 of its founding treaty, which states that an attack on one member is considered an attack on all members. This commitment means that if one NATO member is attacked, the other 31 members are obligated to come to its defense. This mutual defense clause has only been invoked once in the alliance’s history, following the September 11, 2001 attacks in the United States. The solidarity provided by Article 5 forms the cornerstone of NATO’s deterrence strategy, ensuring that potential adversaries know that any attack on a NATO member will trigger a unified response from the entire alliance. This principle remains a key element of NATO’s security strategy, particularly in light of increasing global tensions and threats from adversaries like Russia.

In his recent speech and interview with the BBC, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte emphasized the urgency for NATO members to significantly increase their defense spending, highlighting the looming threat posed by Russia. He praised former President Donald Trump for pushing NATO allies to boost their defense budgets, acknowledging Trump’s impact on European military spending during his presidency.

Rutte’s remarks also revealed his strategic approach in dealing with potential challenges ahead, particularly with Trump’s potential return to the White House. Known as “The Trump Whisperer” in NATO circles, Rutte was instrumental in convincing Trump that European allies were increasing their defense expenditures during his presidency. With Trump possibly returning to power, Rutte’s continued efforts to maintain U.S. commitment to NATO and European defense are critical. His diplomatic finesse and ability to engage with the U.S. leadership make him a key figure in steering NATO’s strategic direction.

Addressing the citizens of NATO member states, Rutte made a heartfelt appeal for greater public support in prioritizing defense spending, despite competing domestic issues like rising living costs and health care. He acknowledged that increasing defense budgets might require sacrifices in other areas but emphasized the long-term importance of securing democracy and Western values. His message was clear: without stronger defense investments, NATO members risk facing severe challenges in the near future, particularly in light of Russia’s growing military threats.

Rutte’s call to action was framed as a plea to the people of NATO nations, especially those in Europe and Canada, to urge their governments to prioritize national security. He stressed that if NATO fails to act now, the alliance will face serious difficulties within the next few years. With his experience as a former prime minister and his close ties to U.S. leadership, Rutte remains a pivotal figure in guiding NATO through these critical times.

Rutte’s speech at the NATO summit underscored the growing divide between Europe’s immediate concerns and the long-term necessity for robust defense spending. He recognized that citizens across the continent face daily challenges such as inflation, healthcare, and migration, and these issues inevitably compete for government attention and resources. However, Rutte warned that the rising geopolitical tensions—particularly Russia’s aggressive stance—require Europe to make defense a top priority.

He stressed that Europe’s security landscape has changed dramatically in the wake of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, which has exposed vulnerabilities in the defense frameworks of many NATO countries. Despite NATO’s collective defense agreements, Rutte pointed out that many nations in Europe are not yet meeting the alliance’s target of 2% of GDP spent on defense, and some are still lagging far behind. This creates a dangerous situation where the alliance’s unity and readiness could be compromised when faced with an escalated threat from Russia or other global powers.

Rutte’s remarks also highlighted the changing nature of warfare, where conventional defense strategies must evolve to address emerging threats, including cyberattacks, hybrid warfare, and the rapid advancement of military technologies. He suggested that NATO must adapt to these new realities by investing in modern defense systems and bolstering its technological capabilities to maintain a strategic edge.

The Secretary General also pointed to NATO’s vital role in fostering global stability, with a focus not just on military readiness but also on diplomatic and economic efforts to support member states. He advocated for a strengthened NATO presence in critical regions, such as the Black Sea and the Arctic, where tensions with Russia are growing. Rutte called for a comprehensive defense strategy that integrates not only military might but also economic resilience, cyber capabilities, and strong international alliances.

As tensions rise, especially in Ukraine, Rutte is positioning NATO as an essential player in maintaining the balance of power in Europe and beyond. His call for action resonates not only within the halls of power but also with the public, urging citizens to understand that the sacrifices they make now—through higher taxes or reductions in other areas of government spending—are necessary for the long-term security and preservation of democratic values.

Rutte’s candid assessment of the situation also highlighted the need for a united approach across NATO, which is vital in the face of potential isolationist tendencies within some member countries. He underscored that the strength of the alliance depends on the collective will of its members to act decisively and commit to mutual defense obligations. The challenge remains for leaders like Rutte to convince both their citizens and their political counterparts of the urgent need for these investments in a time of uncertainty and global instability.

In the backdrop of a likely shift in U.S. foreign policy under a possible second term for Donald Trump, Rutte’s speech took on additional significance. Trump’s previous demands for NATO allies to meet defense spending targets were a contentious issue during his first term, but Rutte’s pragmatic approach in managing these demands has gained him respect within NATO circles. He knows that if NATO is to maintain its strength and cohesion in the face of mounting global challenges, its members must not only meet agreed-upon defense spending benchmarks but exceed them in response to the rapidly changing global security environment.

The Secretary General’s message was clear: Europe and Canada must take ownership of their own security while ensuring the continued cooperation of the United States. If NATO is to remain a formidable force in the face of Russian aggression and other global threats, the alliance must undergo a significant transformation, shifting into a “wartime mindset” as it prepares for the challenges of the coming decades.

References

1. ^ “Final Communiqué”. www.nato.int. 17 September 1949. Archived from the original on 6 December 2006. Retrieved 2 March 2024. English and French shall be the official languages for the entire North Atlantic Treaty Organization.
2. ^ NATO (4 April 1949). “The North Atlantic Treaty”. NATO. Archived from the original on 14 September 2011. Retrieved 2 March 2024. This Treaty, of which the English and French texts are equally authentic.
3. ^ NATO. “Mark Rutte takes office as NATO Secretary General”. NATO. Retrieved 1 October 2024.
4. ^ “Defence Expenditure of NATO Countries (2014–2024)” (PDF). NATO.
5. ^ Jump up to:^a b “What is NATO?”. NATO – Homepage. n.d. Archived from the original on 28 February 2022. Retrieved 3 March 2022.
6. ^ Cook, Lorne (25 May 2017). “NATO, the world’s biggest military alliance, explained”. Military Times. Associated Press. Archived from the original on 25 May 2017. Retrieved 3 March 2022.
7. ^ “Animus in consulendo liber”. NATO. Archived from the original on 9 January 2017. Retrieved 23 March 2015.
8. ^ Szenes, Zoltan (2023). “Szenes, Zoltan. “Reinforcing deterrence: assessing NATO’s 2022 Strategic Concept.” Defense & Security Analysis 39.4 (2023): 539–560″. Defense & Security Analysis. 39 (4). doi:10.1080/14751798.2023.2270230.
9. ^ “NATO to accelerate deployment of up to 300,000 soldiers on eastern border”. Ukrainska Pravda. Archived from the original on 19 March 2023. Retrieved 14 June 2023.
10. ^ Batchelor, Tom (9 March 2022). “Where are Nato troops stationed and how many are deployed across Europe?”. The Independent. Archived from the original on 8 June 2022. Retrieved 8 June 2022.
11. ^ “[1] Archived 9 March 2024 at the Wayback Machine.” worlddata.info. Retrieved on 15 September 2024. “Members of the NATO: North Atlantic Treaty Organization.”
12. ^ “World military expenditure reaches new record high as European spending surges”. SIPRI. 24 April 2023. Archived from the original on 28 April 2023. Retrieved 29 April 2023.
13. ^ NATO. “The Wales Declaration on the Transatlantic Bond”. NATO. Archived from the original on 10 June 2018. Retrieved 2 March 2024.
14. ^ Erlanger, Steven (26 March 2014). “Europe Begins to Rethink Cuts to Military Spending”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on 29 March 2014. Retrieved 3 April 2014. Last year, only a handful of NATO countries met the target, according to NATO figures, including the United States, at 4.1 percent, and Britain, at 2.4 percent.
15. ^ Jump up to:^a b “Notification Reference No. 2024-008” (PDF). United States Department of State. 7 March 2024. Archived (PDF) from the original on 7 March 2024. Retrieved 7 March 2024.
16. ^ “The origins of WEU: Western Union”. University of Luxembourg. December 2009. Archived from the original on 21 June 2018. Retrieved 23 July 2018.
17. ^ “A short history of NATO”. NATO. Archived from the original on 26 March 2017. Retrieved 26 March 2017.
18. ^ “Canada and NATO – 1949”. Archived from the original on 8 April 2022. Retrieved 14 April 2022.
19. ^ Findley, Paul (2011). Speaking Out: A Congressman’s Lifelong Fight Against Bigotry, Famine, and War. Chicago Review Press, Incorporated. ISBN 9781569768914. Archived from the original on 4 April 2023. Retrieved 24 April 2022.
20. ^ The McGraw-Hill Encyclopedia of World Biography: An International Reference Work. McGraw-Hill. 1973. ISBN 9780070796331. Archived from the original on 4 April 2023. Retrieved 24 April 2022.
21. ^ Ismay, Hastings (4 September 2001). “NATO the first five years 1949–1954”. NATO. Archived from the original on 15 March 2017. Retrieved 10 April 2012.
22. ^ Baldwin, Hanson (28 September 1952). “Navies Meet the Test in Operation Mainbrace”. New York Times: E7. Archived from the original on 10 October 2017. Retrieved 10 April 2012.
23. ^ “NATO: The Man with the Oilcan”. Time. 24 March 1952. Archived from the original on 8 January 2012. Retrieved 17 January 2012.
24. ^ Glass, Andrew (14 May 2014). “Soviet Union establishes Warsaw Pact, May 14, 1955”. Politico. Archived from the original on 24 September 2022. Retrieved 10 June 2022.
25. ^ Olmsted, Dan (September 2020). “Should the United States Keep Troops in Germany?”. National WW2 Museum. Archived from the original on 25 January 2021. Retrieved 22 February 2021.
26. ^ van der Eyden 2003, pp. 104–106.
27. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Cody, Edward (12 March 2009). “After 43 Years, France to Rejoin NATO as Full Member”. The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 26 October 2017. Retrieved 19 December 2011.
28. ^ “Spain and NATO”. Country Studies US. Source: U.S. Library of Congress. Archived from the original on 15 April 2021. Retrieved 10 April 2021.
29. ^ Harding, Luke (14 July 2007). “Kremlin tears up arms pact with Nato”. The Observer. Archived from the original on 31 August 2013. Retrieved 1 May 2012.
30. ^ Kimball, Daryl (August 2017). “The Conventional Armed Forces in Europe (CFE) Treaty and the Adapted CFE Treaty at a Glance”. Arms Control Association. Archived from the original on 24 February 2021. Retrieved 22 February 2021.
31. ^ Techau, Jan (2 September 2015). “The Politics of 2 Percent: NATO and the Security Vacuum in Europe”. Carnegie Europe. Archived from the original on 23 September 2018. Retrieved 22 February 2021.
32. ^ Eichler, Jan (2021). NATO’s Expansion After the Cold War: Geopolitics and Impacts for International Security. Springer Nature. pp. 34, 35. ISBN 9783030666415.
33. ^ “Declassified documents show security assurances against NATO expansion to Soviet leaders from Baker, Bush, Genscher, Kohl, Gates, Mitterrand, Thatcher, Hurd, Major, and Woerner”. National Security Archive. 12 December 2017. Archived from the original on 23 December 2019. Retrieved 3 March 2022.
34. ^ Wiegrefe, Klaus (18 February 2022). “Neuer Aktenfund von 1991 stützt russischen Vorwurf”. Der Spiegel. Archived from the original on 3 March 2022. Retrieved 3 March 2022.
35. ^ Baker, Peter (9 January 2022). “In Ukraine Conflict, Putin Relies on a Promise That Ultimately Wasn’t”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on 1 March 2022. Retrieved 3 March 2022.
36. ^ “NATO Announces Special 70th Anniversary Summit In London In December”. Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. 6 February 2019. Archived from the original on 6 April 2019. Retrieved 6 April 2019.
37. ^ Jing Ke (2008). “Did the US Media Reflect the Reality of the Kosovo War in an Objective Manner? A Case Study of The Washington Post and The Washington Times” (PDF). University of Rhode Island. Archived from the original (PDF) on 23 March 2019.
38. ^ NATO. “Relations with the Republic of North Macedonia (Archived)”. NATO. Archived from the original on 10 March 2015. Retrieved 16 February 2022.
39. ^ “Invocation of Article 5 confirmed”. North Atlantic Treaty Organization. 3 October 2001. Archived from the original on 30 December 2012. Retrieved 29 January 2013.
40. ^ “Counter-piracy operations”. North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Archived from the original on 26 May 2011. Retrieved 27 May 2011.
41. ^ Jump up to:^a b Stratton, Allegra (17 June 2008). “Sarkozy military plan unveiled”. The Guardian. UK. Archived from the original on 7 March 2016. Retrieved 17 December 2016.
42. ^ “Defence Planning Committee (DPC) (Archived)”. NATO. 11 November 2014. Archived from the original on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 13 August 2016.
43. ^ “Statement by the North Atlantic Council following meeting under article 4 of the Washington Treaty”. NATO Newsroom. 4 March 2014. Archived from the original on 10 March 2014. Retrieved 2 April 2014.
44. ^ “The consultation process and Article 4”. NATO. 24 February 2022. Archived from the original on 2 April 2022. Retrieved 3 April 2022.
45. ^ Techau, Jan (2 September 2015). “The Politics of 2 Percent: NATO and the Security Vacuum in Europe”. Carnegie Europe. Archived from the original on 12 July 2018. Retrieved 11 July 2018. A month before [the alliance’s summit in Riga in 2006], Victoria Nuland, then the U.S. ambassador to NATO, called the 2 percent metric the “unofficial floor” on defence spending in NATO. But never had all governments of NATO’s 28 nations officially embraced it at the highest possible political level – a summit declaration.
46. ^ Jump up to:^a b “NATO’s military presence in the east of the Alliance”. NATO. 28 March 2022. Archived from the original on 31 March 2022. Retrieved 3 April 2022.
47. ^ McLeary, Paul; Toosi, Nahal (11 February 2022). “U.S. sending 3,000 more troops to Poland amid fresh Ukraine invasion warnings”. Politico. Archived from the original on 22 February 2022. Retrieved 3 April 2022.
48. ^ “Spain sends warships to Black Sea, considers sending warplanes”. Reuters. 21 January 2022. Archived from the original on 22 January 2022. Retrieved 3 April 2022.
49. ^ “Spain will send four fighter jets and 130 troops to Bulgaria”. Reuters. 9 February 2022. Archived from the original on 14 February 2022. Retrieved 3 April 2022.
50. ^ “NATO, G7, EU leaders display unity, avoid confrontation with Russia”. Deutsche Welle. 25 March 2022. Archived from the original on 3 April 2022. Retrieved 3 April 2022.
51. ^ Gonzalez, Oriana (26 February 2022). “NATO Response Force deploys for first time”. Axios. Archived from the original on 20 March 2022. Retrieved 3 April 2022.
52. ^ “NATO BOOSTS FORCES IN EAST TO DETER RUSSIAN MENACE”. BIRN. Balkan Insight. Balkan Investigative Reporting Network. 14 June 2022. Archived from the original on 15 June 2022. Retrieved 15 June 2022.
53. ^ Jump up to:^a b “NATO’s Operations 1949–Present” (PDF). NATO. 2009. Archived from the original (PDF) on 1 March 2013. Retrieved 3 March 2013.
54. ^ Zenko 2010, pp. 133–134.
55. ^ Zenko 2010, p. 134.
56. ^ NATO Handbook: Evolution of the Conflict, NATO, archived from the original on 7 November 2001
57. ^ UN Document A/54/549, Report of the Secretary-General pursuant to General Assembly resolution 53/35: The fall of Srebrenica, un.org, Archived 12 September 2009 at the Wayback Machine, accessed 25 April 2015.
58. ^ Bethlehem & Weller 1997, p. liiv.
59. ^ Jump up to:^a b Zenko 2010, pp. 137–138
60. ^ Clausson 2006, pp. 94–97.
61. ^ Tice, Jim (22 February 2009). “Thousands more now eligible for NATO Medal”. Army Times. Archived from the original on 7 September 2012. Retrieved 11 April 2012.
62. ^ “Nato to strike Yugoslavia”. BBC News. 24 March 1999. Archived from the original on 26 September 2015. Retrieved 25 September 2015.
63. ^ Thorpe, Nick (24 March 2004). “UN Kosovo mission walks a tightrope”. BBC News. Archived from the original on 26 July 2012. Retrieved 11 April 2012.
64. ^ “The Kosovo refugee crisis” (PDF). United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. 19 December 2005. Archived (PDF) from the original on 23 July 2023. Retrieved 23 July 2023.
65. ^ “NATO reaffirms power to take action without UN approval”. CNN. 24 April 1999. Archived from the original on 28 January 2015. Retrieved 4 September 2013.
66. ^ “Allied Command Atlantic”. NATO Handbook. NATO. Archived from the original on 13 August 2008. Retrieved 3 September 2008.
67. ^ “Kosovo Report Card”. International Crisis Group. 28 August 2000. Archived from the original on 4 March 2012. Retrieved 11 April 2012.
68. ^ Helm, Toby (27 September 2001). “Macedonia mission a success, says Nato”. The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on 5 September 2012. Retrieved 11 April 2012.
69. ^ “NATO’s role in Kosovo”. NATO. 10 July 2023. Archived from the original on 26 June 2023. Retrieved 23 July 2023.
70. ^ Münch, Philipp (2021). “Creating common sense: Getting NATO to Afghanistan”. Journal of Transatlantic Studies. 19 (2): 138–166. doi:10.1057/s42738-021-00067-0. ISSN 1479-4012.
71. ^ “NATO Update: Invocation of Article 5 confirmed”. NATO. 2 October 2001. Archived from the original on 25 August 2010. Retrieved 22 August 2010.
72. ^ “NATO takes historic step into Afghanistan”. Al Jazeera. Reuters. 11 August 2003. Archived from the original on 23 July 2023. Retrieved 23 July 2023.
73. ^ “UNSC Resolution 1510, October 13, 2003” (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 October 2010. Retrieved 5 July 2010.
74. ^ “ISAF Chronology”. NATO. Archived from the original on 13 November 2010. Retrieved 5 July 2010.
75. ^ Morales, Alex (5 October 2006). “NATO Takes Control of East Afghanistan From U.S.-Led Coalition”. Bloomberg L.P. Archived from the original on 24 July 2014. Retrieved 4 September 2013.
76. ^ “La France et l’OTAN”. Le Monde (in French). France. Archived from the original on 12 October 2007. Retrieved 16 July 2011.
77. ^ “NATO sets “irreversible” but risky course to end Afghan war”. Reuters. Reuters. 21 May 2012. Archived from the original on 22 October 2012. Retrieved 22 May 2012.
78. ^ Rasmussen, Sune Engel (28 December 2014). “Nato ends combat operations in Afghanistan”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on 2 January 2015. Retrieved 24 October 2019.
79. ^ “NATO to Cut Forces in Afghanistan, Match US Withdrawal”. VOA News. 14 April 2021. Archived from the original on 15 April 2021. Retrieved 17 August 2021.
80. ^ “Afghanistan stunned by scale and speed of security forces’ collapse”. The Guardian. 13 July 2021. Archived from the original on 15 August 2021. Retrieved 17 August 2021.
81. ^ “Taliban surge in Afghanistan: EU and NATO in state of shock”. Deutsche Welle. 16 August 2021. Archived from the original on 17 August 2021. Retrieved 17 August 2021.
82. ^ “Afghanistan takeover sparks concern from NATO allies”. Deutsche Welle. 16 August 2021. Archived from the original on 19 August 2021. Retrieved 19 August 2021.
83. ^ “Migration fears complicate Europe’s response to Afghanistan crisis”. Politico. 16 August 2021. Archived from the original on 19 August 2021. Retrieved 19 August 2021.
84. ^ “Official Website”. Jfcnaples.nato.int. Archived from the original on 12 December 2011. Retrieved 29 January 2013.
85. ^ El Gamal, Rania (17 December 2011). “NATO closes up training mission in Iraq”. Reuters. Archived from the original on 18 December 2011. Retrieved 17 January 2012.
86. ^ Croft, Adrian (3 October 2012). “NATO demands halt to Syria aggression against Turkey”. Reuters. Archived from the original on 4 October 2012. Retrieved 3 October 2012.
87. ^ Ford, Dana (26 July 2015). “Turkey calls for rare NATO talks after attacks along Syrian border”. Cnn.com. CNN. Archived from the original on 27 July 2015. Retrieved 26 July 2015.
88. ^ “Operation Allied Provider”. Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe. 30 September 2014. Archived from the original on 14 November 2016. Retrieved 4 April 2024.
89. ^ “Operation Ocean Shield”. NATO. Archived from the original on 13 May 2011. Retrieved 3 March 2011.
90. ^ “2009 Operation Ocean Shield News Articles”. NATO. October 2010. Archived from the original on 29 April 2011. Retrieved 19 May 2011.
91. ^ “Operation Ocean Shield purpose”. 12 July 2016. Archived from the original on 13 September 2016. Retrieved 27 September 2016.
92. ^ “Counter-piracy operations (2008-2016)”. NATO. Archived from the original on 12 July 2024. Retrieved 8 August 2024.
93. ^ “Security Council Approves ‘No-Fly Zone’ over Libya, Authorizing ‘All Necessary Measures’ to Protect Civilians, by Vote of 10 in Favour with 5 Abstentions”. United Nations Meetings Coverage and Press Releases. 17 March 2011. Archived from the original on 9 July 2024. Retrieved 8 August 2024.
94. ^ Anrig, Christian F. (2011). “Allied Air Power over Libya: A Preliminary Assessment”. Air & Space Power Journal. 25 (4): 1.
95. ^ Jump up to:^a b “Statement by the NATO Secretary General on Libya arms embargo”. NATO. 22 March 2011. Archived from the original on 28 April 2011. Retrieved 25 March 2011.
96. ^ “Press briefing by NATO Spokesperson Oana Lungescu, Brigadier General Pierre St-Amand, Canadian Air Force and General Massimo Panizzi, spokesperson of the Chairman of the Military Committee”. NATO. 23 March 2011. Archived from the original on 28 April 2011. Retrieved 25 March 2011.
97. ^ “NATO reaches deal to take over Libya operation; allied planes hit ground forces”. Washington Post. 25 March 2011. Archived from the original on 17 February 2013.
98. ^ “NATO to police Libya no-fly zone”. English.aljazeera.net. 24 March 2011. Archived from the original on 26 March 2011. Retrieved 25 March 2011.
99. ^ O’Sullivan, Arieh (31 March 2011). “UAE and Qatar pack an Arab punch in Libya operation”. Jerusalem Post. se. Archived from the original on 6 November 2012. Retrieved 29 January 2013.
100. ^ “NATO strikes Tripoli, Gaddafi army close on Misrata” Archived 12 August 2011 at the Wayback Machine, Khaled al-Ramahi. Malaysia Star. 9 June 2011. Retrieved 9 June 2011
101. ^ Coughlin, Con (9 June 2011). “Political Gridlock at NATO” Archived 10 October 2017 at the Wayback Machine, Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 9 June 2011
102. ^ “Gates Calls on NATO Allies to Do More in Libya” Archived 14 March 2022 at the Wayback Machine, Jim Garamone. US Department of Defense. 8 June 2011. Retrieved 9 June 2011
103. ^ Cloud, David S. (9 June 2011). “Gates calls for more NATO allies to join Libya air campaign” Archived 14 March 2022 at the Wayback Machine, Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 9 June 2011
104. ^ Burns, Robert (10 June 2011). “Gates blasts NATO, questions future of alliance” Archived 5 November 2013 at the Wayback Machine, Washington Times. Retrieved 29 January 2013
105. ^ Birnbaum, Michael (10 June 2011). “Gates rebukes European allies in farewell speech” Archived 25 August 2017 at the Wayback Machine, Washington Post. Retrieved 10 June 2011.
106. ^ Amland, Bjoern H. (10 June 2011). “Norway to quit Libya operation by August” Archived 11 April 2020 at the Wayback Machine, Associated Press.
107. ^ “Danish planes running out of bombs” Archived 12 June 2011 at the Wayback Machine, Times of Malta. 10 June 2011. Retrieved 11 June 2011
108. ^ “Danish Planes in Libya Running Out of Bombs: Report”, Defense News. 9 June 2011. Retrieved 11 June 2011
109. ^ “Navy chief: Britain cannot keep up its role in Libya air war due to cuts” Archived 13 September 2018 at the Wayback Machine, James Kirkup. The Telegraph. 13 June 2011. Retrieved 29 January 2013
110. ^ “NATO: Ongoing resistance by pro-Gadhafi forces in Libya is ‘surprising'”. The Washington Post. UPI. 11 October 2011. Archived from the original on 16 October 2013. Retrieved 29 January 2013.
111. ^ “NATO strategy in Libya may not work elsewhere”. USA Today. 21 October 2011. Retrieved 22 October 2011.
112. ^ Tharoor, Ishaan (16 May 2012). “How Many Innocent Civilians Did NATO Kill in Libya?”. Time Magazine. Archived from the original on 1 April 2016. Retrieved 9 April 2016.
113. ^ Croft, Adrian. “NATO to advise Libya on strengthening security forces”. Reuters. Archived from the original on 30 September 2015. Retrieved 1 July 2017.
114. ^ todayszaman.com: “PM: Turkey may invoke NATO’s Article 5 over Syrian border fire” Archived 26 June 2015 at the Wayback Machine, 11 April 2012
115. ^ todayszaman.com: “Observers say NATO’s fifth charter comes into play if clashes with Syria get worse” Archived 26 June 2015 at the Wayback Machine, 11 April 2012
116. ^ todayszaman.com: “NATO says monitoring tension in Turkey-Syria border” Archived 26 June 2015 at the Wayback Machine, 12 April 2012
117. ^ “The consultation process and Article 4”. NATO. 24 February 2022. Archived from the original on 2 April 2022. Retrieved 25 February 2022.
118. ^ telegraph.co.uk: “Turkey calls for emergency Nato meeting to discuss Isil and PKK” Archived 16 October 2022 at the Wayback Machine, 26 July 2015
119. ^ Ford, Dana (27 July 2015). “Turkey calls for rare NATO talks after attacks along Syrian border”. CNN. Archived from the original on 16 October 2022. Retrieved 27 July 2015.
120. ^ Barnard, Anne; Gordon, Michael R.; Schmitt, Eric (27 July 2015). “Turkey and U.S. Plan to Create Syria ‘Safe Zone’ Free of ISIS”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on 16 October 2022.
121. ^ “Statement by the North Atlantic Council following meeting under Article 4 of the Washington Treaty”. NATO. 28 July 2015. Archived from the original on 27 February 2022. Retrieved 27 February 2022.
122. ^ “Russia denies involvement in airstrikes on Turkish troops in Idlib”. Daily Sabah. 28 February 2020. Archived from the original on 28 February 2020. Retrieved 1 March 2022.
123. ^ “Greece ‘vetoes NATO statement’ on support for Turkey amid Syria escalation”. 29 February 2020. Archived from the original on 3 March 2020. Retrieved 1 March 2022. The Russian military later explained that the Syrian army targeted Hayat Tahrir al-Sham terrorists operating in the province, adding that Syrian government forces were not informed about the Turkish presence in the area.
124. ^ NATO (4 April 1949). “The North Atlantic Treaty”. NATO. Archived from the original on 14 September 2011. Retrieved 2 March 2024..
125. ^ Collins 2011, pp. 122–123.
126. ^ “The area of responsibility”. NATO Declassified. NATO. 23 February 2013. Archived from the original on 1 June 2013. Retrieved 28 September 2013.
127. ^ “Washington Treaty”. NATO. 11 April 2011. Archived from the original on 16 October 2013. Retrieved 28 September 2013.
128. ^ “How does a country join NATO?”. Al Jazeera. 12 July 2023. Archived from the original on 22 July 2023. Retrieved 23 July 2023.
129. ^ “Denmark and NATO – 1949”. Archived from the original on 13 April 2022. Retrieved 13 April 2022.
130. ^ “Why the concept of Gaullo-Mitterrandism is still relevant”. IRIS. 29 April 2019. Archived from the original on 7 March 2022. Retrieved 7 March 2022.
131. ^ NATO. “Member countries”. NATO. Archived from the original on 29 March 2020. Retrieved 29 June 2022.
132. ^ NATO. “Relations with the Republic of North Macedonia (Archived)”. NATO. Archived from the original on 10 March 2015. Retrieved 16 February 2022.
133. ^ “NATO’s border with Russia doubles as Finland joins”. BBC News. 4 April 2023. Archived from the original on 4 April 2023. Retrieved 4 April 2023.
134. ^ “NATO Topics: Individual Partnership Action Plans”. NATO. Archived from the original on 10 March 2013. Retrieved 29 January 2013.
135. ^ “Yanukovych signs law declaring Ukraine’s non-aligned status”. Kyiv Post. 15 July 2010. Archived from the original on 2 February 2022. Retrieved 25 February 2022.
136. ^ “Ukraine drops non-aligned status in swipe at Moscow”. France 24. 23 December 2014. Archived from the original on 8 March 2024. Retrieved 8 March 2024.
137. ^ “Ukraine’s parliament backs changes to Constitution confirming Ukraine’s path toward EU, NATO”. Ukrainian Independent Information Agency. 7 February 2019. Archived from the original on 15 February 2022. Retrieved 7 March 2024.
138. ^ “The law amending the Constitution on the course of accession to the EU and NATO has entered into force | European integration portal”. eu-ua.org (in Ukrainian). Archived from the original on 28 September 2020. Retrieved 23 March 2021.
139. ^ “Brussels Summit Communiqué issued by the Heads of State and Government participating in the meeting of the North Atlantic Council in Brussels 14 June 2021”. NATO. Archived from the original on 21 February 2022. Retrieved 14 June 2021.
140. ^ “Russia will act if Nato countries cross Ukraine ‘red lines’, Putin says”. The Guardian. 30 November 2021. Archived from the original on 17 December 2021. Retrieved 13 December 2021.
141. ^ “NATO Pushes Back Against Russian President Putin’s ‘Red Lines’ Over Ukraine”. The Drive. 1 December 2021. Archived from the original on 14 December 2021. Retrieved 13 December 2021.
142. ^ “Putin warns Russia will act if NATO crosses its red lines in Ukraine”. Reuters. 30 November 2021. Archived from the original on 19 January 2022. Retrieved 13 December 2021.
143. ^ “Russia demands NATO roll back from East Europe and stay out of Ukraine”. Reuters. 17 December 2021. Archived from the original on 22 February 2022. Retrieved 7 March 2024.
144. ^ “NATO chief: “Russia has no right to establish a sphere of influence””. Axios. 1 December 2021. Archived from the original on 14 February 2022. Retrieved 13 December 2021.
145. ^ “Is Russia preparing to invade Ukraine? And other questions”. BBC News. 10 December 2021. Archived from the original on 19 December 2021. Retrieved 13 December 2021.
146. ^ “US offers no concessions in response to Russia on Ukraine”. Associated Press. 26 January 2022. Archived from the original on 1 October 2023. Retrieved 7 March 2024.
147. ^ “Ukraine applies for Nato membership after Russia annexes territory”. The Guardian. 30 September 2022. Archived from the original on 1 October 2022. Retrieved 30 September 2022.
148. ^ George J, Teigen JM (2008). “NATO Enlargement and Institution Building: Military Personnel Policy Challenges in the Post-Soviet Context”. European Security. 17 (2): 346. doi:10.1080/09662830802642512. ISSN 0966-2839. S2CID 153420615.
149. ^ Cathcourt, Will (27 March 2014). “Obama Tells Georgia to Forget About NATO After Encouraging It to Join”. The Daily Beast. Archived from the original on 16 April 2014. Retrieved 15 April 2014.
150. ^ Klussmann, Uwe; Schepp, Matthias; Wiegrefe, Klaus (26 November 2009). “NATO’s Eastward Expansion: Did the West Break Its Promise to Moscow?”. Spiegel Online. Archived from the original on 5 April 2014. Retrieved 7 April 2014.
151. ^ Levada-Center and Chicago Council on Global Affairs about Russian-American relations Archived 19 August 2017 at the Wayback Machine. Levada-Center. 4 November 2016.
152. ^ “Pew survey: Russia disliked around world; most in Poland, Turkey see Kremlin as major threat”. Kyiv Post. 16 August 2017. Archived from the original on 23 March 2019. Retrieved 4 September 2018.
153. ^ “NATO summit: Poland pins its hopes on the USA”. Deutsche Welle. Archived from the original on 4 September 2018. Retrieved 4 September 2018.
154. ^ Smith, Michael (10 February 2017). “Most NATO Members in Eastern Europe See It as Protection”. Gallup. Archived from the original on 4 September 2018. Retrieved 4 September 2018.
155. ^ Epstein, Rachel (2006). “Nato Enlargement and the Spread of Democracy: Evidence and Expectations”. Security Studies. 14 (1): 63. doi:10.1080/09636410591002509. S2CID 143878355.
156. ^ “China joins Russia in opposing Nato expansion”. BBC News. 4 February 2022. Archived from the original on 17 February 2022. Retrieved 4 February 2022.
157. ^ “NATO Common Funds Burdensharing: Background and Current Issues”. Congressional Research Service. 15 February 2012. Archived from the original on 14 February 2024. Retrieved 14 February 2024.
158. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Farley, Robert; Kiely, Eugene (13 February 2024). “Fact-checking Trump comments on ‘delinquent’ NATO countries”. Roll Call. Archived from the original on 14 February 2024. Retrieved 14 February 2024.
159. ^ Jump up to:^a b c “Funding NATO”. North Atlantic Treaty Organization. 14 February 2024. Archived from the original on 13 February 2024. Retrieved 14 February 2024.
160. ^ Jump up to:^a b Gray, Andrew; Siebold, Sabine (13 February 2024). “What did Trump say about NATO funding and what is Article 5?”. Reuters. Retrieved 14 February 2024.
161. ^ Sabbagh, Dan (14 February 2024). “Nato chief rebukes Donald Trump and announces record defence spending”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 14 February 2024. Retrieved 14 February 2024.
162. ^ Jump up to:^a b “Secretary General in Washington: NATO makes America stronger”. NATO.int. NATO. 17 June 2024. Retrieved 19 June 2024.
163. ^ Jump up to:^a b Knickmeyer, Ellen; Seung Min Kim (17 June 2024). “A record number of NATO allies are hitting their defense spending target during war in Ukraine”. APNews.com. Associated Press. Retrieved 19 June 2024.
164. ^ “Cooperative Archer military exercise begins in Georgia”. RIA Novosti. 9 July 2007. Archived from the original on 7 January 2014. Retrieved 3 December 2013.
165. ^ Jump up to:^a b “Partnership for Peace”. NATO. Archived from the original on 1 March 2011. Retrieved 3 March 2011.
166. ^ “Nato and Belarus – partnership, past tensions and future possibilities”. Foreign Policy and Security Research Center. Archived from the original on 20 October 2013. Retrieved 25 November 2010.
167. ^ “NATO Topics: The Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council”. NATO. Archived from the original on 24 October 2010. Retrieved 22 August 2010.
168. ^ “Declaration by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan”. NATO. Archived from the original on 8 September 2010. Retrieved 22 August 2010.
169. ^ Boxhoorn, Bram (21 September 2005). “Broad Support for NATO in the Netherlands”. ATA Education. Archived from the original on 18 February 2007. Retrieved 7 July 2022.
170. ^ Howorth, Jolyon (2019). “Strategic Autonomy and EU-NATO Cooperation: A Win-Win Approach”. L’Europe en Formation. 389 (2): 85–103. doi:10.3917/eufor.389.0085. Archived from the original on 28 February 2022. Retrieved 14 April 2023.
171. ^ “Official Journal of the European Union”. EUR-Lex. 7 June 2016. Archived from the original on 21 March 2023. Retrieved 14 April 2023.
172. ^ “NATO Partner countries”. NATO. 6 March 2009. Archived from the original on 5 August 2011. Retrieved 15 June 2011.
173. ^ “Qatar eyes full NATO membership: Defense minister”. The Peninsula. 5 June 2018. Archived from the original on 2 October 2019. Retrieved 11 September 2019.
174. ^ “Nato rejects Qatar membership ambition”. Dhaka Tribune. 6 June 2018. Archived from the original on 2 December 2019. Retrieved 11 September 2019.
175. ^ “Qatar signs security agreement with NATO”. NATO. 16 January 2018. Archived from the original on 1 October 2019. Retrieved 11 September 2019.
176. ^ “NATO Topics:NATO’s relations with Contact Countries”. NATO. Archived from the original on 10 September 2013.
177. ^ “NATO PARTNERSHIPS: DOD Needs to Assess U.S. Assistance in Response to Changes to the Partnership for Peace Program” (PDF). United States Government Accountability Office. September 2010. Archived from the original (PDF) on 18 June 2013. Retrieved 27 August 2013.
178. ^ “Partners”. NATO. 2 April 2012. Archived from the original on 7 October 2012. Retrieved 12 October 2012.
179. ^ “NATO needs to address China’s rise, says Stoltenberg”. Reuters. 7 August 2019. Archived from the original on 14 August 2019. Retrieved 11 September 2019.
180. ^ “Relations with Colombia”. nato.int. 19 May 2017. Archived from the original on 21 May 2017. Retrieved 20 May 2017.
181. ^ “Colombia to be NATO’s first Latin American global partner”. Reuters. 26 May 2018. Archived from the original on 18 August 2022. Retrieved 14 April 2023.
182. ^ “Topic: Consensus decision-making at NATO”. NATO. 5 July 2016. Archived from the original on 25 February 2022. Retrieved 25 February 2022.
183. ^ Piehler, G. Kurt (24 July 2013). Encyclopedia of Military Science. SAGE Publications. pp. 991–995. ISBN 978-1-5063-1081-7. Archived from the original on 23 July 2023. Retrieved 23 July 2023.
184. ^ “NATO Parliamentary Assembly in brief”. The House of Commons. 30 June 2023. Archived from the original on 23 July 2023. Retrieved 23 July 2023.
185. ^ “NATO homepage”. Archived from the original on 26 March 2009. Retrieved 12 March 2006.
186. ^ “NATO Headquarters”. NATO. 10 August 2010. Archived from the original on 13 September 2010. Retrieved 22 August 2010.
187. ^ Small, Melvin (1 June 1998). “The Atlantic Council—The Early Years” (PDF). NATO. Archived (PDF) from the original on 3 March 2016. Retrieved 15 November 2015.
188. ^ “Atlantic Treaty Association and Youth Atlantic Treaty Association”. NATO. 7 April 2016. Archived from the original on 30 October 2021. Retrieved 11 March 2022.
189. ^ “Chair of the Military Committee”. NATO. 31 March 2023. Archived from the original on 26 June 2023. Retrieved 23 July 2023.
190. ^ “France to rejoin NATO command”. CNN. 17 June 2008. Archived from the original on 5 December 2013. Retrieved 4 September 2013.
191. ^ Fuller, Thomas (18 February 2003). “Reaching accord, EU warns Saddam of his ‘last chance'”. International Herald Tribune. Archived from the original on 12 October 2007. Retrieved 15 July 2007.
192. ^ “About us”. Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe. Archived from the original on 8 March 2022. Retrieved 6 March 2022.
193. ^ “The Rapid Deployable Corps”. NATO. 26 November 2012. Archived from the original on 10 September 2013. Retrieved 4 September 2013.
194. ^ “Who We Are”. Allied Command Transformation. Archived from the original on 6 March 2022. Retrieved 6 March 2022.
195. ^ Jump up to:^a b Randall, Thomas E. (July 2014). “Legal Authority of NATO Commanders” (PDF). NATO Legal Gazette (34): 39–45. Archived (PDF) from the original on 29 August 2021. Retrieved 29 August 2021.
196. ^ Jackson, General Sir Mike (4 September 2007). “Gen Sir Mike Jackson: My clash with Nato chief”. Telegraph Media Group Limited. Archived from the original on 10 January 2022.

Works cited

• Art, Robert J. (1998). “Creating a Disaster: NATO’s Open Door Policy”. Political Science Quarterly. 113 (3): 383–403. doi:10.2307/2658073. JSTOR 2658073.
• Bethlehem, Daniel L.; Weller, Marc (1997). The ‘Yugoslav’ Crisis in International Law. Cambridge International Documents Series. Vol. 5. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-46304-1. Archived from the original on 3 April 2016. Retrieved 27 June 2015.
• Clausson, M.I. (2006). NATO: Status, Relations, and Decision-Making. Nova Publishers. ISBN 978-1-60021-098-3. Archived from the original on 5 April 2016. Retrieved 27 June 2015.
• Collins, Brian J. (2011). NATO: A Guide to the Issues. ABC-CLIO. ISBN 978-0-313-35491-5. Archived from the original on 15 April 2016. Retrieved 27 June 2015.
• van der Eyden, Ton (2003). Public management of society: rediscovering French institutional engineering in the European context. Vol. 1. IOS Press. ISBN 978-1-58603-291-3. Archived from the original on 18 April 2016. Retrieved 27 June 2015.
• Zenko, Micah (2010). Between Threats and War: U.S. Discrete Military Operations in the Post-Cold War World. Stanford University Press. ISBN 978-0-8047-7191-7. Archived from the original on 11 April 2016. Retrieved 27 June 2015.

Further reading

Library resources about
NATO

• Resources in your library
• Resources in other libraries

• Atlantic Council of the United States (August 2003). “Transforming the NATO Military Command Structure: A New Framework for Managing the Alliance’s Future” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 3 October 2012.
• Axelrod, Robert, and Silvia Borzutzky. “NATO and the war on terror: The organizational challenges of the post 9/11 world.” Review of International Organizations 1.3 (2006): 293–307. online
• Borawski, John, and Thomas-Durell Young. NATO after 2000: the future of the Euro-Atlantic Alliance (Greenwood, 2001).
• Hendrickson, Ryan C. “NATO’s next secretary general: Rasmussen’s leadership legacy for Jens Stoltenberg.” Journal of Transatlantic Studies (2016) 15#3 pp 237–251.
• Ismay, Hastings (1954). “NATO: The First Five Years”. Paris: NATO. Archived from the original on 15 March 2017. Retrieved 4 April 2017.
• “NATO at 70: Balancing Collective Defense and Collective Security”, Special issue of Journal of Transatlantic Studies 17#2 (June 2019) pp: 135–267.
• NATO Office of Information and Press, NATO Handbook : Fiftieth Anniversary Edition, NATO, Brussels, 1998–99, Second Reprint, ISBN 92-845-0134-2
• Pedlow, Gregory W. “Evolution of NATO’s Command Structure 1951–2009” (PDF). aco.nato.int. Brussels(?): NATO ACO. Archived from the original (PDF) on 21 July 2011. Retrieved 18 February 2015.
• Sayle, Timothy Andrews. Enduring Alliance: A History of NATO and the Postwar Global Order (Cornell University Press, 2019) online review
• Stevenson, Tom, “Ill-Suited to Reality” (review of Sten Rynning, NATO: From Cold War to Ukraine, A History of the World’s Most Powerful Alliance, Yale, March 2024, ISBN 978 0 300 27011 2, 345 pp.; Peter Apps, Deterring Armageddon: A Biography of NATO, Wildfire, February 2024, ISBN 978 1 03 540575 6, 624 pp.; Grey Anderson, ed., Natopolitanism: The Atlantic Alliance since the Cold War, Verso, July 2023, ISBN 978 1 80429 237 2, 356 pp.), London Review of Books, vol. 46, no. 15 (1 August 2024), pp. 15–16, 18. “The most egregious cases of international aggression since the founding of the [NATO] alliance have all involved the US: Korea, Vietnam, the First Gulf War, Afghanistan, Iraq. Yet thanks to the alliance, US-led wars have usually been defended in Europe by appealing to their righteousness…. Triumphalism about Nato has also tended to conceal the extent of US covert activity inside Europe throughout the Cold War, including… in Italy… Denmark… and France… as well as in West Germany and the Netherlands…. The CIA was heavily involved in securing the takeover of Greece by a military junta in 1967…. It might be cosier to imagine a world without CIA torture sites in Poland, Lithuania and Romania, but that isn’t the world we live in…. The conditions for the creation of [NATO] were established by Britain’s survival in 1940 and its role as a springboard for Eisenhower‘s ‘Crusade in Europe’. [Discussions about founding NATO began in] 1948, leading to… the ‘Pentagon proposals’. Nato’s founding treaty was [signed in] April 1949… [Today, t]hirty-five years after the end of the Cold War, almost a hundred thousand US military… are stationed across Europe… Another 12,500 are with the Sixth Fleet in the Mediterranean…. Tactical nuclear weapons are deployed… in Germany, Italy, Belgium and the Netherlands… Only US officials can… order… their use.” [p. 15.] “It isn’t a law of nature that Dutch pilots should fly [US-made] F-35s and carry US nuclear bombs on orders from Washington.” (p. 18.)