The North’s official Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) issued the criticism in an article attributed to an international security analyst, following Japan’s formal inauguration of an independent mission to NATO last week to bolster cooperation.

North Korea has condemned Japan’s decision to open a diplomatic mission to NATO, calling it a provocative move that would escalate military tensions in the region. The North’s official news agency, the Korean Central News Agency (KCNA), released a statement on Monday, criticizing the move as a dangerous step that could worsen the already volatile security situation in the area.

The article, attributed to an international security analyst, specifically targeted Japan’s growing ties with NATO, which were further cemented with the formal inauguration of Japan’s independent mission to the alliance last week. The move aims to enhance Japan’s collaboration with NATO on a range of security issues, particularly in the Indo-Pacific region, which has been increasingly affected by North Korea’s military activities and the broader geopolitical rivalry between China, the U.S., and their allies.

The North Korean commentary warned that Japan’s deeper involvement with NATO would only fuel tensions and potentially provoke further military escalation. It also raised concerns about Japan’s long-term military ambitions and the potential implications for peace and stability in the region.

This marks the latest development in a series of increasingly strained relations between North Korea and Japan, exacerbated by North Korea’s continued missile tests and its provocative rhetoric. Japan’s outreach to NATO is seen as a strategic move to bolster its defense posture amid concerns over North Korea’s growing military capabilities, as well as China’s assertiveness in regional matters.

North Korea has long viewed NATO’s presence in the Asia-Pacific region as a threat to its sovereignty and has consistently criticized any external intervention in regional security matters. The opening of Japan’s NATO mission is expected to be a point of contention in the already tense relations between the two nations.

North Korea has strongly criticized Japan’s establishment of an independent mission to NATO, accusing it of exacerbating regional instability and military tensions. In a statement released by the Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) on Monday, the North labeled Japan’s actions as “a dangerous act” that worsens the security environment in the Asia-Pacific region.

KCNA stated that Japan’s decision to open the mission came at a time when the security situation in the region is already under threat, particularly due to the U.S.’s “provocative military hegemony.” The North further condemned Japan’s growing military cooperation with NATO, describing it as an escalation of military tension. The article attributed Japan’s actions to the United States’ strategy for global domination, particularly its efforts to extend NATO’s influence into the Asia-Pacific.

The KCNA’s statement also called Japan “a war criminal state” and an “anti-peace force,” accusing it of contributing to the militarization of the region through its alliance with NATO, military buildup, and continuous war drills. The agency warned that the strengthening ties between Japan and NATO pose a significant threat to international peace and security.

Japan’s diplomatic outreach to NATO has been part of a broader strategy to enhance security cooperation in response to North Korea’s missile tests and growing tensions in the region. The NATO alliance, which has focused primarily on European security, has increasingly engaged with countries in the Indo-Pacific, including Japan and South Korea, particularly in light of Russia’s war against Ukraine and its growing ties with North Korea.

North Korea has long been critical of NATO’s involvement in Asia, viewing such moves as a direct threat to its sovereignty and the stability of the region. With NATO’s increasing engagement in the Indo-Pacific, the alliance’s relations with countries like Japan are expected to remain a source of friction with North Korea.

Courtesy: Firstpost

References

• ^ “Politics of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea”. Naenara. Retrieved 17 January 2025. The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea is an independent socialist state guided by the great Kimilsungism–Kimjongilism in its activities.
• ^ “Korea, North”. The World Factbook. Central Intelligence Agency. 6 December 2023. Archived from the original on 12 August 2015. Retrieved 8 December 2023.
• ^ Jump up to:^a b Demographic Yearbook – Table 3: Population by sex, rate of population increase, surface area and density (PDF). United Nations Statistics Division. 2012. p. 5. Archived (PDF) from the original on 26 August 2020. Retrieved 29 November 2014.
• ^ “North Korea country profile”. BBC News. 17 October 2023. Archived from the original on 7 June 2022. Retrieved 17 October 2023.
• ^ “Korea North”. The World Factbook (2025 ed.). Central Intelligence Agency. Retrieved 12 November 2024.
• ^ Jump up to:^a b “Real GDP (purchasing power parity)”. www.cia.gov. CIA World Factbook.
• ^ Jump up to:^a b “GDP (PPP) per capita Field listing”. CIA World Factbook. Archived from the original on 25 June 2014. Retrieved 31 May 2014.
• ^ “UNData app”. data.un.org. Archived from the original on 28 November 2022. Retrieved 12 October 2022.
• ^ “Decree on Redesignating Pyongyang Time”. Naenara. 30 April 2018. Archived from the original on 5 May 2018. Retrieved 4 May 2018.
• ^ Jump up to:^a b “Telephone System Field Listing”. CIA The World Factbook. Archived from the original on 25 June 2014. Retrieved 17 June 2014.
• ^ Jump up to:^a b Hersher, Rebecca (21 September 2016). “North Korea Accidentally Reveals It Only Has 28 Websites”. NPR. Archived from the original on 22 September 2016. Retrieved 22 September 2016.
• ^ McCurry, Justin (16 January 2024). “Unification with South Korea no longer possible, says Kim Jong-un”. The Guardian. p. 1.
• ^ “Chapter I. Politics”. Socialist Constitution of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (2019) . 2019 – via Wikisource.
• ^ Korea原名Corea 美國改的名 (in Chinese). United Daily News. 5 July 2008. Archived from the original on 6 October 2014. Retrieved 28 March 2014.
• ^ Buzo, Adrian (2002). The Making of Modern Korea. London: Routledge. p. 72. ISBN 978-0-415-23749-9.
• ^ Cumings, Bruce (2005). Korea’s Place in the Sun: A Modern History. New York: W. W. Norton & Company. pp. 505–506. ISBN 978-0-393-32702-1.
• ^ Young, Benjamin R (7 February 2014). “Why is North Korea called the DPRK?”. NK News. Archived from the original on 9 February 2014. Retrieved 9 February 2014.
• ^ “Early Korea”. Archived from the original on 25 June 2015.
• ^ *매국사학의 몸통들아, 공개토론장으로 나와라!. ngonews. 24 December 2015. Archived from the original on 19 September 2016.
  • 요서 vs 평양… 한무제가 세운 낙랑군 위치 놓고 열띤 토론. Segye Ilbo. 21 August 2016. Archived from the original on 13 April 2017.
  • “갈석산 동쪽 요서도 고조선 땅” vs “고고학 증거와 불일치”. The Dong-a Ilbo. 22 August 2016. Archived from the original on 24 February 2021. Retrieved 14 April 2017.
• ^ Yi, Ki-baek (1984). A New History of Korea. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. pp. 12, 56. ISBN 978-0-674-61576-2.
• ^ Cumings, Bruce (2005). Korea’s Place in the Sun: A Modern History. New York: W. W. Norton & Company. p. 182. ISBN 978-0-393-32702-1.
• ^ Cumings, Bruce (2005). Korea’s Place in the Sun: A Modern History. New York: W. W. Norton & Company. pp. 174–175, 407. ISBN 978-0-393-32702-1.
• ^ Robinson, Michael E (2007). Korea’s Twentieth-Century Odyssey. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press. pp. 84–86. ISBN 978-0-8248-3174-5.
• ^ Lone, Stewart; McCormack, Gavan (1993). Korea since 1850. Melbourne: Longman Cheshire. pp. 184–185.
• ^ Lone, Stewart; McCormack, Gavan (1993). Korea since 1850. Melbourne: Longman Cheshire. p. 175.
• ^ Robinson, Michael E (2007). Korea’s Twentieth-Century Odyssey. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press. p. 113. ISBN 978-0-8248-3174-5.
• ^ Lankov, Andrei (16 March 2005). “North Korea’s missionary position”. Asia Times Online. Archived from the original on 18 March 2005. Retrieved 24 February 2024.
• ^ Robinson, Michael E (2007). Korea’s Twentieth-Century Odyssey. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press. pp. 85–87, 155. ISBN 978-0-8248-3174-5.
• ^ “Administrative Population and Divisions Figures (#26)” (PDF). DPRK: The Land of the Morning Calm. Permanent Committee on Geographical Names for British Official Use. April 2003. Archived from the original (PDF) on 25 September 2006. Retrieved 10 October 2006.
• ^ Lankov, Andrei (25 January 2012). “Terenti Shtykov: the other ruler of nascent N. Korea”. The Korea Times. Archived from the original on 17 April 2015. Retrieved 14 April 2015.
• ^ Dowling, Timothy (2011). “Terentii Shtykov”. History and the Headlines. ABC-CLIO. Archived from the original on 24 September 2015. Retrieved 26 April 2015.
• ^ Lankov, Andrei. “North Korea in 1945–48: The Soviet Occupation and the Birth of the State”. From Stalin to Kim Il Sung – The Formation of North Korea, 1945–1960. pp. 2–3.
• ^ Lankov, Andrei (10 April 2013). The Real North Korea: Life and Politics in the Failed Stalinist Utopia. Oxford University Press. p. 7.
• ^ “United Nations Security Council – History”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Archived from the original on 12 May 2021. Retrieved 12 May 2021.
• ^ “U.S.: N. Korea Boosting Guerrilla War Capabilities”. Fox News Network, LLC. Associated Press. 23 June 2009. Archived from the original on 27 June 2009. Retrieved 4 July 2009.
• ^ Kim, Samuel S. (2014). “The Evolving Asian System”. International Relations of Asia. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 45. ISBN 978-1442226418. With three of the four major Cold War fault lines—divided Germany, divided Korea, divided China, and divided Vietnam – East Asia acquired the dubious distinction of having engendered the largest number of armed conflicts resulting in higher fatalities between 1945 and 1994 than any other region or sub-region. Even in Asia, while Central and South Asia produced a regional total of 2.8 million in human fatalities, East Asia’s regional total is 10.4 million including the Chinese Civil War (1 million), the Korean War (3 million), the Vietnam War (2 million), and the Pol Pot genocide in Cambodia (1 to 2 million).
• ^ Cumings, Bruce (2011). The Korean War: A History. Modern Library. p. 35. ISBN 978-0812978964. Various encyclopedias state that the countries involved in the three-year conflict suffered a total of more than 4 million casualties, of which at least 2 million were civilians—a higher percentage than in World War II or Vietnam. A total of 36,940 Americans lost their lives in the Korean theater; of these, 33,665 were killed in action, while 3,275 died there of nonhostile causes. Some 92,134 Americans were wounded in action, and decades later, 8,176 were still reported as missing. South Korea sustained 1,312,836 casualties, including 415,004 dead. Casualties among other UN allies totaled 16,532, including 3,094 dead. Estimated North Korean casualties numbered 2 million, including about one million civilians and 520,000 soldiers. An estimated 900,000 Chinese soldiers lost their lives in combat.
• ^ McGuire, James (2010). Wealth, Health, and Democracy in East Asia and Latin America. Cambridge University Press. p. 203. ISBN 978-1139486224. In Korea, war in the early 1950s cost nearly 3 million lives, including nearly a million civilian dead in South Korea.
• ^ Painter, David S. (1999). The Cold War: An International History. Routledge. p. 30. ISBN 978-0415153164. Before it ended, the Korean War cost over 3 million people their lives, including over 50,000 US servicemen and women and a much higher number of Chinese and Korean lives. The war also set in motion a number of changes that led to the militarization and intensification of the Cold War.
• ^ Lewy, Guenter (1980). America in Vietnam. Oxford University Press. pp. 450–453. ISBN 978-0199874231. For the Korean War the only hard statistic is that of American military deaths, which included 33,629 battle deaths and 20,617 who died of other causes. The North Korean and Chinese Communists never published statistics of their casualties. The number of South Korean military deaths has been given as in excess of 400,000; the South Korean Ministry of Defense puts the number of killed and missing at 281,257. Estimates of communist troops killed are about one-half million. The total number of Korean civilians who died in the fighting, which left almost every major city in North and South Korea in ruins, has been estimated at between 2 and 3 million. This adds up to almost 1 million military deaths and a possible 2.5 million civilians who were killed or died as a result of this extremely destructive conflict. The proportion of civilians killed in the major wars of this century (and not only in the major ones) has thus risen steadily. It reached about 42 percent in World War II and may have gone as high as 70 percent in the Korean War. … we find that the ratio of civilian to military deaths [in Vietnam] is not substantially different from that of World War II and is well below that of the Korean War.
• ^ Armstrong 2010, p. 1: “The number of Korean dead, injured or missing by war’s end approached three million, ten percent of the overall population. The majority of those killed were in the North, which had half of the population of the South; although the DPRK does not have official figures, possibly twelve to fifteen percent of the population was killed in the war, a figure close to or surpassing the proportion of Soviet citizens killed in World War II.”
• ^ Cumings, Bruce (1997). Korea’s Place in the Sun: A Modern History. WW Norton & Company. pp. 297–298. ISBN 978-0-393-31681-0.
• ^ Jager 2013, pp. 237–242.
• ^ Stewart, Richard W., ed. (2005). “The Korean War, 1950–1953”. American Military History, Volume 2. United States Army Center of Military History. CMH Pub 30-22. Archived from the original on 28 May 2008. Retrieved 20 August 2007.
• ^ Abt 2014, pp. 125–126.
• ^ Brune, Lester H. (1996). The Korean War: Handbook of the Literature and Research. Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 60. ISBN 978-0-313-28969-9.
• ^ “North Korea claims 1 million youth enlist amid drone tensions”. TRTWORLD. 16 October 2024. Retrieved 16 October 2024.
• ^ “North Korea says 1.4 million apply to join army amid tensions with South”. Reuters. 15 October 2024. Retrieved 16 October 2024.
• ^ Armstrong 2010, p. 9.
• ^ Jump up to:^a b Chung, Chin O. Pyongyang Between Peking and Moscow: North Korea’s Involvement in the Sino-Soviet Dispute, 1958–1975. University of Alabama, 1978, p. 45.
• ^ Jump up to:^a b Zagoria, Donald S.; Kim, Young Kun (December 1975). “North Korea and the Major Powers”. Asian Survey. 15 (12): 1017–1035. doi:10.2307/2643582. ISSN 0004-4687. JSTOR 2643582.
• ^ Country Study 2009, p. XV.
• ^ Schaefer, Bernd. “North Korean ‘Adventurism’ and China’s Long Shadow, 1966–1972”. Washington, D.C.: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, 2004.
• ^ Campbell, John Coert (196). American Policy Toward Communist Eastern Europe: The Choices Ahead. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. p. 116. ISBN 0-8166-0345-6.
• ^ Armstrong, Charles. Tyranny of the Weak: North Korea and the World, 1950–1992. Studies of the Weatherhead East Asian Institute, Columbia University. Cornell University Press. pp. 99–100.
• ^ Country Study 2009, pp. xxxii, 46.
• ^ French 2007, pp. 97–99.
• ^ Cumings, Bruce (2011). North Korea: Another Country. The New Press. p. 9. ISBN 978-1-59558-739-8.
• ^ Jump up to:^a b Lankov, Andrei (2013). The Real North Korea: Life and Politics in the Failed Stalinist Utopia. OUP US. p. 64. ISBN 978-0-19-996429-1.
• ^ Demick, Barbara (16 July 2010). “North Korea’s giant leap backwards”. The Guardian. Retrieved 21 January 2021.
• ^ Kirkbride, Wayne (1984). DMZ, a story of the Panmunjom axe murder. Hollym International Corp.
• ^ Bandow, Doug; Carpenter, Ted Galen, eds. (1992). The U.S.–South Korean Alliance: Time for a Change. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers. pp. 99–100. ISBN 978-1-4128-4086-6. Archived from the original on 13 September 2016.
• ^ Chinoy, Mike (8 July 1997). “North Korea ends mourning for Kim Il Sung”. CNN. Archived from the original on 19 May 2015. Retrieved 9 May 2015.
• ^ Kwak, Tae-Hwan; Joo, Seung-Ho (2003). The Korean peace process and the four powers. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd. ISBN 978-0-7546-3653-3.
• ^ DeRouen, Karl; Heo, Uk (2005). Defense and Security: A Compendium of National Armed Forces and Security Policies. ABC-CLIO.