Trudeau Dismisses Speculation Over Canada Becoming 51st U.S. State

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has once again firmly dismissed the notion of Canada becoming the 51st state of the United States. In an appearance on MSNBC’s Inside with Jen Psaki on Sunday, Trudeau stated unequivocally, “It’s not going to happen.”

The Prime Minister was responding to repeated comments made by President-Elect Donald Trump, who has floated the idea of annexing Canada in recent speeches. Trump, a known negotiator, has suggested that eliminating the “artificially drawn line” between Canada and the U.S. would improve national security and be a positive step for both countries. At a press conference at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida, Trump went so far as to call Trudeau “Governor Trudeau,” a term typically used for U.S. state leaders, fueling speculation about potential annexation.

Trudeau, unfazed by the remarks, brushed off the idea, choosing to focus on the more substantial issues at hand rather than on personal jabs. He remarked, “I tend to focus on the substantive things, and not on people choosing nicknames for me. I mean, if I was that thin-skinned I probably wouldn’t last that long in politics.”

Amid these public comments, Trudeau’s leadership is facing growing challenges. His Liberal Party has been struggling in the polls ahead of the upcoming national election, and he recently announced that he would step down in March after his party elects a new leader.

Courtesy: MSNBC

While Trump’s remarks on annexing Canada have sparked controversy, Trudeau has remained steadfast in his commitment to Canada’s sovereignty and independence. The Canadian Prime Minister’s response reflects his resolve to maintain the country’s autonomy despite the ongoing attention surrounding these speculative comments.

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has once again reaffirmed that Canada has no interest in becoming the 51st state of the United States, stressing that the decision ultimately comes down to one key factor: the will of the Canadian people. In his recent comments, Trudeau pointed out that when Canadians define their national identity, they are quick to say, “We’re not Americans,” making it clear that they take pride in their independence.

Earlier this week, Trudeau was even more blunt, stating that there was “not a snowball’s chance in hell” that Canada and the U.S. would ever merge into one nation. While the idea of annexation continues to surface in President-Elect Donald Trump’s speeches, Trudeau’s remarks underscored that the concept has little support among the Canadian public.

Beyond these political jabs, Trudeau’s main concern remains the growing tension between the two nations over tariffs. Trump’s announcement of plans to implement 25% tariffs on Canadian goods has escalated tensions, with fears that the move could severely impact Canada’s economy. Trudeau expressed concern over the economic ramifications, saying, “Canadians are incredibly proud of being Canadian, but people are now talking about that rather than the impact of 25 percent tariffs.” He also pointed out that such a tariff would be detrimental to both countries, highlighting that no American wants to pay 25% more for electricity or oil and gas imports from Canada.

The topic of trade and energy partnerships also surfaced as Alberta Premier Danielle Smith shared that she had met with Trump at his Mar-a-Lago estate over the weekend. The discussions focused on the importance of U.S.-Canada energy cooperation, as Alberta remains a major oil and gas exporter to the U.S.

As the two countries navigate these complex issues, Trudeau’s position remains clear: Canada values its sovereignty and the relationship with its southern neighbor, but any potential moves towards closer integration or annexation will remain off the table.

Courtesy: CBC News: The National

References

• ^
  • Mckenna, Peter (1999). “Canada, the United States, and the Organization of American States”. American Review of Canadian Studies. 29 (3): 473–493. doi:10.1080/02722019909481638. ISSN 0272-2011. this important and complex relationship,
  • “Reconcilable Differences: A History of Canada-US Relations”. Oxford University Press. Reconcilable Differences provides students with a contemporary look at the often complex relationship between Canada and the United States from 1763 to today, using the most recent scholarship available.
  • “Canada and the United States”. The Canadian Encyclopedia. June 11, 2020. “The Americans are our best friends whether we like it or not.” This statement, uttered in the House of Commons by Robert Thompson, the leader of the Social Credit Party early in the 1960s, perhaps best captures the essence of Canada’s complex relationship with its nearest neighbor.
  • Shull, Aaron; Tandt, Michael Den (December 13, 2021). “Is US President Joe Biden Good or Bad for Canada?”. Centre for International Governance Innovation. Canadians have a complex relationship with the United States.
  • “Dispute Resolution in the Canada-United States Free Trade Agreement: One Element of a Complex Relationship”. McGill Law Journal. September 18, 2018.
  • Hale, Geoffrey (November 1, 2012). “So Near Yet So Far”. UBC Press. How do politicians, diplomats, and interest groups negotiate the tangled web of Canada–US relations? So Near Yet So Far provides an in-depth look at the multiple dimensions of this complex relationship..
  • “A Canadian Agenda for the USA: Obama and Beyond”. Canadian Global Affairs Institute. August 1, 2018. Complex and Complicated but Mutually-Beneficial Relationship Ours is a very complex relationship building, as John F. Kennedy remarked, on ties of history, geography, economics, security, and deep people-to-people relationships.
  • “”The U.S. Studies Program at The University of British Columbia will significantly increase our understanding of the United States and its institutions and policies through critical research, teaching, and public outreach, making a tremendous contribution to Canada’s complex relationship with the U.S.””. usstudies. January 16, 2013.
• ^
  • Canada, Global Affairs (November 24, 2022). “Canada’s Indo-Pacific Strategy”. GAC. Retrieved October 21, 2023.
  • House, The White (February 24, 2021). “Remarks by President Biden and Prime Minister Trudeau of Canada in Joint Press Statements”. The White House. Retrieved October 21, 2023.
• ^“The Canada–U.S. border: by the numbers”. cbc.ca. CBC/Radio-Canada. December 7, 2011. Retrieved March 23, 2016.
  • “The world’s longest border”. Archived from the original on July 4, 2015. Retrieved April 1, 2008.
• ^ Cudmore, James. “Canadian military explored plan to fully integrate forces with U.S. – Politics – CBC News”. Cbc.ca. Retrieved January 4, 2017.
• ^ Poushter, Jacob (October 6, 2015). “Canadians Satisfied with U.S. Relationship”. Pew Research Center’s Global Attitudes Project. Retrieved October 21, 2023.
• ^ Brenan, Megan (March 21, 2023). “Canada, Britain Favored Most in U.S.; Russia, N. Korea Least”. Gallup, Inc. Retrieved October 21, 2023.
• ^ “State of Trade 2024: Supply chains”. GAC. August 28, 2023. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
• ^ “Canada-United States relations”. GAC. March 28, 2019. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
• ^ “Canada-United States relations”. GAC. March 28, 2019. Retrieved December 20, 2024.
• ^ “U.S. Relations With Canada”. United States Department of State. September 30, 2022. Retrieved December 20, 2024.
• ^ “Canada and the United States”. The Canadian Encyclopedia. June 11, 2020. Retrieved December 20, 2024.
• ^
  • Mingst, K.; Karns, M.P. (2019). The United Nations In The Post-cold War Era, Second Edition. Taylor & Francis. p. 63. ISBN 978-1-000-30674-3.
  • Massie, Justin (April 30, 2019). “Why Canada Goes to War: Explaining Combat Participation in US-led Coalitions”. Canadian Journal of Political Science. 52 (3). Cambridge University Press (CUP): 575–594. doi:10.1017/s0008423919000040.
• ^ Jump up to:^a b c Massie, Justin (April 30, 2019). “Why Canada Goes to War: Explaining Combat Participation in US-led Coalitions”. Canadian Journal of Political Science. 52 (3). Cambridge University Press (CUP): 575–594. doi:10.1017/s0008423919000040. ISSN 0008-4239.
• ^ Gutiérrez-Haces, Maria Teresa (November 6, 2018). Identity and Otherness in Canadian Foreign Policy. Collection internationale d’Études canadiennes | International Canadian Studies Series. University of Ottawa Press. pp. 231–250. ISBN 978-0-7766-2722-9.
• ^ Carroll, Michael K (2016). “Peacekeeping: Canada’s past, but not its present and future?”. International Journal. 71 (1). [Sage Publications, Ltd., Canadian International Council]: 167–176. doi:10.1177/0020702015619857. ISSN 0020-7020. JSTOR 44631172. Retrieved February 28, 2024.
• ^ “Canada’s Current Role in World” (PDF). Environics Institute for Survey Research.
• ^ Jump up to:^a b Doran, Charles F.; Sewell, James Patrick (1988). “Anti-Americanism in Canada?”. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 497. [Sage Publications, Inc., American Academy of Political and Social Science]: 105–119. doi:10.1177/0002716288497001009. ISSN 0002-7162. JSTOR 1045764.
• ^ Jump up to:^a b Kim Richard Nossal (2007). “Anti-Americanism in Canada,” in Brendon O’Connor, ed., Anti-Americanism: History, Causes, and Themes” (PDF). Oxford/Westport: Greenwood World Publishing}. pp. 59, 76.
• ^ “War of 1812”. www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca. Retrieved October 25, 2023.
• ^ John Herd Thompson, Canada and the United States: ambivalent allies (2008).
• ^ Thomas Morgan, William (1926). “The Five Nations and Queen Anne”. Mississippi Valley Historical Review. 13 (2): 169–189. doi:10.2307/1891955. JSTOR 1891955.
• ^ June Namias, White Captives: Gender and Ethnicity on the American Frontier (1993)
• ^ Howard H. Peckham, The Colonial Wars (1965)
• ^ Chard, Donald F. (1975). “The Impact of French Privateering on New England, 1689–1713”. American Neptune. 35 (3): 153–165.
• ^ Shortt, S. E. D. (1972). “Conflict and Identity in Massachusetts: The Louisbourg Expedition of 1745”. Social History/Histoire Sociale. 5 (10): 165–185.
• ^ Johnston, A. J. B. (2008). “D-Day at Louisbourg”. Beaver. 88 (3): 16–23.
• ^ “The Loyalist Flag”. UELAC. December 6, 2021. Retrieved December 26, 2024.
• ^ Mason Wade, The French Canadians, 1760–1945 (1955) p. 74.
• ^ George W. Geib (1987). “The Old Northwest Under British Control, 1763–1783” and “Indiana A Part of the Old Northwest, 1783–1800”. Butler University. pp. 42–44.
• ^ Thomas B. Allen, Tories: Fighting for the King in America’s First Civil War (2011) p. xviii
• ^ Bradford Perkins, The First Rapprochement: England and the United States, 1795–1805 (1955)
• ^ Rawlyk, George A. (1994). The Canada Fire: Radical Evangelicalism in British North America, 1775–1812. McGill-Queen’s Press. p. 122. ISBN 9780773512214. Retrieved November 6, 2015.
• ^ Alan Taylor, The Civil War of 1812: American Citizens, British Subjects, Irish Rebels, & Indian Allies (2010).
• ^ Stagg 2012, pp. 5–6.
• ^ George F. G. Stanley, 1983, p. 32 ^{[full citation needed]}
• ^ David Heidler, Jeanne T. Heidler, The War of 1812, pg4 ^{[full citation needed]}
• ^ Tucker 2011, p. 236.
• ^ Nugent 2008, p. 73, 75.
• ^ Mark Zuehlke, For Honour’s Sake: The War of 1812 and the Brokering of an Uneasy Peace (2007) is a Canadian perspective.
• ^ W.L. Morton, The Kingdom of Canada (1969) ch 12
• ^ Cleves, Rachel Hope; Eustace, Nicole; Gilje, Paul; Hale, Matthew Rainbow; Morgan, Cecilia; Opal, Jason M.; Peskin, Lawrence A.; Taylor, Alan (2012). “Interchange: The War of 1812”. The Journal of American History. 99 (2). [Oxford University Press, Organization of American Historians]: 520–555. doi:10.1093/jahist/jas236. ISSN 0021-8723. JSTOR 44306807. Retrieved April 4, 2024.
• ^ Wood, James A. (2010). Militia Myths (PDF). Vancouver: UBC Press. p. 12. ISBN 978-0-7748-1765-3. OCLC 473375581.
• ^ Dunning, Tom (2009). “The Canadian Rebellions of 1837 and 1838 as a Borderland War: A Retrospective”. Ontario History. 101 (2): 129–141. doi:10.7202/1065615ar.
• ^ Orrin Edward Tiffany, The Relations of the United States to the Canadian Rebellion of 1837–1838 (1905). excerpt and text search
• ^ Cross, L.D. (2010). The Underground Railroad: The long journey to freedom in Canada. Amazing Stories. James Lorimer Limited, Publishers. p. intro. ISBN 978-1-55277-581-3.
• ^ “Underground Railroad”. CBC. Retrieved April 4, 2024.
• ^ Robin W. Winks, “The Creation of a Myth: ‘Canadian’ Enlistments in the Northern Armies during the American Civil War”, Canadian Historical Review, 1958 39(1): 24–40.
• ^ Adam Mayers, Dixie & the Dominion: Canada, the Confederacy, and the War for the Union (2003)
• ^ Jump up to:^a b c “Alabama Claims, 1862–1872”. GlobalSecurity.org.
• ^ Mayers, Dixie & the Dominion pp 105–116.
• ^ Congressional series of United States public documents. U.S. Government Printing Office. 1870. p. 71.
• ^ David Keys (June 24, 2014). “Historians reveal secrets of UK gun-running which lengthened the American civil war by two years”. The Independent.
• ^ Paul Hendren (April 1933). “The Confederate Blockade Runners”. United States Naval Institute.
• ^ Sexton, Jay (2005). Debtor Diplomacy: Finance and American Foreign Relations in the Civil War Era, 1837–1873. Oxford University Press. p. 206. ISBN 9780199281039. Retrieved November 6, 2015.
• ^ Theodore C. Blegen, “A Plan for the Union of British North America and the United States, 1866”. Mississippi Valley Historical Review 4.4 (1918): 470–483 online.
• ^ Doris W. Dashew, “The Story of An Illusion: The Plan To Trade ‘Alabama’ Claims For Canada”, Civil War History, December 1969, Vol. 15 Issue 4, pp 332–348
• ^ Shi, David E. (1978). “Seward’s Attempt to Annex British Columbia, 1865–1869”. Pacific Historical Review. 47 (2): 217–238. doi:10.2307/3637972. JSTOR 3637972.
• ^ Shain, Yossi (1999). Marketing the American Creed Abroad: Diasporas in the U.S. and Their Homelands. Cambridge U.P. p. 53. ISBN 9780521642255. Retrieved November 6, 2015.
• ^ David Sim, “Filibusters, Fenians, and a Contested Neutrality: The Irish Question and US Diplomacy, 1848–1871”. American Nineteenth Century History 12.3 (2011): 265–287.
• ^ Robert M. Groceman, “Patriot War and the Fenian Raids: Case Studies in Border Security on the US Canada Border in the Nineteenth Century” (US Army Command and General Staff College Fort Leavenworth United States, 2017) online Archived November 13, 2020, at the Wayback Machine.
• ^ Kurlansky, Mark (1998). Cod: A Biography of the Fish That Changed the World. Penguin. p. 117. ISBN 9781440672873. Retrieved November 6, 2015.
• ^ Munro, John A. (1965). “English-Canadianism and the Demand for Canadian Autonomy: Ontario’s Response to the Alaska Boundary Decision, 1903”. Ontario History. 57 (4): 189–203.
• ^ David G. Haglund, and Tudor Onea. “Victory without Triumph: Theodore Roosevelt, Honour, and the Alaska Panhandle Boundary Dispute”. Diplomacy and Statecraft 19.1 (2008): 20-41.
• ^ Tucker, Spencer (2011). World War II at Sea: An Encyclopedia. ABC-CLIO. p. 142. ISBN 9781598844573.
• ^ Baker, W. M. (1970). “A Case Study of Anti-Americanism in English-Speaking Canada: The Election Campaign of 1911”. Canadian Historical Review. 51 (4): 426–449. doi:10.3138/chr-051-04-04. S2CID 161614104.
• ^ Clements, Kendrick A. (1973). “Manifest Destiny and Canadian Reciprocity in 1911”. Pacific Historical Review. 42 (1): 32–52. doi:10.2307/3637741. JSTOR 3637741.
• ^ Ellis, Lewis E. (1968). Reciprocity, 1911: a study in Canadian–American relations. Greenwood.
• ^ Paolo E. Coletta, The Presidency of William Howard Taft (1973) pp. 141–152.
• ^ Hugh Ll. Keenleyside, Canada and the United States (1929) p 373. online
• ^ Warren G. Harding & Stanley Park. The History of Metropolitan Vancouver. Vancouver.ca [1] Archived September 16, 2015, at the Wayback Machine. Retrieved June 11, 2017
• ^ Richard N. Kottman, “Herbert Hoover and the Smoot-Hawley Tariff: Canada, A Case Study”, Journal of American History, Vol. 62, No. 3 (December 1975), pp. 609–635 in JSTOR
• ^ McDonald, Judith; et al. (1997). “Trade Wars: Canada’s Reaction to the Smoot–Hawley Tariff”, (1997)”. Journal of Economic History. 57 (4): 802–826. doi:10.1017/S0022050700019549. JSTOR 2951161. S2CID 154380335.
• ^ Carlson, Peter (December 30, 2005). “Raiding the Icebox”. The Washington Post.
• ^ Bell, Christopher M. (1997). “Thinking the Unthinkable: British and American Naval Strategies for an Anglo-American War, 1918–1931”. International History Review. 19 (4): 789–808. doi:10.1080/07075332.1997.9640804.
• ^ Arnold A. Offner, American Appeasement: United States Foreign Policy and Germany, 1933–1938 (1969) p. 256
• ^ Galen Roger Perras, Franklin Roosevelt and the Origins of the Canadian-American Security Alliance, 1933–1945 (1998)
• ^ Richard Jensen, “Nationalism and Civic Duty in Wartime: Comparing World Wars in Canada and America”, Canadian Issues / Thèmes Canadiens, December 2004, pp 6–10
• ^ Rachel Lea Heide, “Allies in Complicity: The United States, Canada, and the Clayton Knight Committee’s Clandestine Recruiting of Americans for the Royal Canadian Air Force, 1940–1942”, Journal of the Canadian Historical Association, 2004, Vol. 15, pp 207–230
• ^ Galen Roger Perras, “Who Will Defend British Columbia? Unity of Command on the West Coast, 1934–1942”, Pacific Northwest Quarterly, Spring 1997, Vol. 88 Issue 2, pp 59–69
• ^ McNeil Earle, Karl (1998). “Cousins of a Kind: The Newfoundland and Labrador Relationship with the United States”. American Review of Canadian Studies. 28 (4): 387–411. doi:10.1080/02722019809481611.
• ^ C. P. Stacey, Canada and the Age of Conflict: A History of Canadian External Policies. Volume 2, 1921–1948: The Mackenzie King Era (1982) pp 420–424.
• ^ Hector Mackenzie, “Golden Decade (s)? Reappraising Canada’s International Relations in the 1940s and 1950s”. British Journal of Canadian Studies 23.2 (2010): 179–206.
• ^ Don Munton and John Kirton, eds. Cases and Readings in Canadian Foreign Policy Since World War II (1992) pp 2–18.
• ^ Stewart, Luke (2018). “‘Hell, they’re your problem, not ours’: Draft Dodgers, Military Deserters and Canada–United States Relations in the Vietnam War Era”. Études Canadiennes / Canadian Studies (85). Open Edition: 67–96. doi:10.4000/eccs.1479. S2CID 181777562.
• ^ Bruce Muirhead, “From Special Relationship to Third Option: Canada, the U.S., and the Nixon Shock”, American Review of Canadian Studies, Vol. 34, 2004 online edition Archived March 23, 2009, at the Wayback Machine
• ^ Lily Gardner Feldman, “Canada and the United States in the 1970s: Rift and Reconciliation”. The World Today 34.12 (1978): 484–492. online
• ^ Hills, Carla A. “NAFTA’s Economic Upsides: The View from the United States”. Foreign Affairs 93 (2014): 122. online
• ^ Wilson, Michael. “NAFTA’s Unfinished Business: The View from Canada”. Foreign Affairs 93 (2014): 128. online
• ^ Marcus Lee Hansen, The Mingling of the Canadian and American Peoples. Vol. 1: Historical (1940)
• ^ John Brebner, The Neutral Yankees of Nova Scotia: A Marginal Colony During the Revolutionary Years (1937)
• ^ Marcus Lee Hansen, The Mingling of the Canadian and American Peoples. Vol. 1: Historical (1940); David D. Harvey, Americans in Canada: Migration and Settlement since 1840 (1991)
• ^ Renee Kasinsky, “Refugees from Militarism: Draft Age Americans in Canada (1976)
• ^ Jump up to:^a b Barkan, Elliott Robert (1980). “French Canadians”. In Thernstrom, Stephan; Orlov, Ann; Handlin, Oscar (eds.). Harvard Encyclopedia of American Ethnic Groups. Harvard University Press. p. 392. ISBN 0674375122. OCLC 1038430174.
• ^ John J. Bukowczyk et al. Permeable Border: The Great Lakes Region as Transnational Region, 1650–1990 (University of Pittsburgh Press. 2005)
• ^ J. Castell Hopkins, The Canadian Annual Review of Public Affairs: 1902 (1903), p. 327.
• ^ Yves Roby, The Franco-Americans of New England (2004)
• ^ Brookes, Alan A. (1980). “Canadians, British”. In Thernstrom, Stephan; Orlov, Ann; Handlin, Oscar (eds.). Harvard Encyclopedia of American Ethnic Groups. Harvard University Press. p. 191. ISBN 0674375122. OCLC 1038430174.
• ^ Soloman Gabriel, Foreign Policy of Canada: A Study in Diefenbaker’s Years (1987).
• ^ Potter, Mitch (November 18, 2013). “JFK’s war with Diefenbaker”. The Toronto Star. Retrieved June 12, 2018.
• ^ Preston, Andrew (2003). “Balancing War and Peace: Canadian Foreign Policy and the Vietnam War, 1961–1965”. Diplomatic History. 27: 73–111. doi:10.1111/1467-7709.00340.
• ^ Brean, Joseph (November 17, 2014). “‘I’ve been called worse things by better people: A history of Canadian PMs’ not-so-diplomatic one-liners”. National Post. National Post. Retrieved June 13, 2018.
• ^ Grande, Peggy (2017). “8: Rawhide’s Ranch”. The president will see you now: my stories and lessons from Ronald Reagan’s final years (First ed.). New York. ISBN 9780316396455. OCLC 951764632.
• ^ “The President’s News Conference With Prime Minister Jean Chretien of Canada”. The American Presidency Project. April 8, 1997. Retrieved May 16, 2018.
• ^ Jehl, Douglas (February 24, 1995). “Clinton, in Talk to Canadians, Opposes Quebec Separation”. The New York Times.
• ^ Drache, Daniel (2008). Big Picture Realities: Canada and Mexico at the Crossroads. Wilfrid Laurier U.P. p. 115. ISBN 9781554582334. Retrieved November 6, 2015.
• ^ “Prime ministers and presidents”. CBC News. February 18, 2009.
• ^ “Guest column: Time, Canada, to negotiate the Northwest Passage”. CBC News. Retrieved July 18, 2017.
• ^ “Obama to visit Canada Feb. 19, PMO confirms – CTV News”. Ctv.ca. January 28, 2009. Archived from the original on June 6, 2009. Retrieved February 26, 2011.
• ^ “Obama loses boozy bet with Harper”. The Globe and Mail. Retrieved April 27, 2016.
• ^ “Barack Obama follows through on Olympic beer bet”. canoe.ca. Archived from the original on February 25, 2014. Retrieved April 27, 2016.
• ^ “Joint Statement by President Obama and Prime Minister Harper of Canada on Regulatory Cooperation”. whitehouse.gov. February 4, 2011. Retrieved February 26, 2011 – via National Archives.
• ^ “PM and U.S. President Obama announce shared vision for perimeter security and economic competitiveness between Canada and the United States”. Office of the Prime Minister of Canada. February 4, 2011. Archived from the original on September 10, 2013. Retrieved February 26, 2011.
• ^ “United States–Canada Regulatory Cooperation Council (RCC) Joint Action Plan: Developing and implementing the Joint Action Plan”. Washingto