NORTHKOREA-MISSILES/UN (TV):US warns North Korea becoming better prepared for war, fighting against Ukraine

US says North Korea gaining experience fighting in Russia against Ukraine

The United States expressed grave concern on Wednesday, warning that North Korea is significantly enhancing its military capabilities by gaining combat experience through its involvement in Russia’s war against Ukraine. This development, according to U.S. officials, makes North Korea “more capable of waging war against its neighbors,” particularly South Korea.

The warning came in the context of escalating international concerns about the growing military cooperation between North Korea and Russia. Since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, Moscow has sought closer diplomatic and military ties with Pyongyang. A notable component of this collaboration is North Korea’s increasing participation in the conflict. Over 12,000 North Korean troops are now reportedly stationed in Russia and have recently engaged in combat operations, particularly in Russia’s Kursk region, located near the Ukrainian border.

U.S. Deputy Ambassador to the United Nations, Dorothy Camille Shea, revealed these developments during a meeting of the U.N. Security Council, underscoring that the deployment of North Korean forces in Ukraine represents a troubling shift. The North Korean troops’ involvement in the conflict, she said, provides Pyongyang with valuable battlefield experience and tactical insights, further bolstering its military preparedness.

Shea noted that this cooperation between North Korea and Russia could also have wider regional implications, heightening tensions in East Asia and posing a growing threat to U.S. allies, particularly Japan and South Korea. As North Korea continues to expand its military and forge new partnerships, there are fears that the lessons learned in Ukraine could be applied to future military actions in the region, potentially leading to increased provocations against neighboring countries.

In response, U.S. officials have called for stronger international sanctions against North Korea, aiming to prevent further escalation of the partnership and its military activity. The U.S. also reiterated its commitment to supporting Ukraine in its defense against Russia, as well as safeguarding regional stability in East Asia.

North Korea says Monday’s missile test part of plan to enhance self-defense

In parallel to these developments, North Korea defended its recent missile test, asserting that it was part of a broader plan to strengthen its national defense capabilities. On Monday, the regime launched a missile, which North Korea claimed was a necessary step to safeguard its sovereignty and self-defense against perceived external threats.

North Korean state media reported that the missile test was conducted as part of ongoing efforts to modernize the country’s military infrastructure and ensure its readiness to respond to any potential aggression. The test comes amid heightened concerns over Pyongyang’s growing military ambitions and its increasing partnership with Russia.

South Korea says North Korean troops ‘slaves to Kim Jong Un’

Meanwhile, South Korea has sharply criticized North Korea’s involvement in the war, calling North Korean soldiers “slaves to Kim Jong Un.” South Korean officials condemned the North’s militaristic actions, particularly its participation in the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, which they said demonstrates the oppressive nature of the Kim regime.

South Korea’s Ministry of Unification stated that North Korean troops are being used as “pawns” to further the ambitions of Kim Jong Un, forcing them into foreign conflicts that do not serve their nation’s interests but instead bolster Kim’s authoritarian rule. The ministry emphasized that such exploitation of North Korean soldiers is a clear indication of the regime’s disregard for human rights and its drive to expand its influence at the cost of its own people.

The South Korean government also expressed concern that the involvement of North Korean troops in Ukraine could lead to greater militarization in the region, potentially threatening the security of the Korean Peninsula and beyond.

The international community is now left to grapple with the broader implications of this alliance between North Korea and Russia, which threatens to exacerbate both regional tensions and global instability.

US Warns of North Korea’s Growing Military Capabilities Amid Russian Alliance

The United States warned the United Nations Security Council on Wednesday that North Korea is significantly enhancing its military strength through its collaboration with Russia in the ongoing war in Ukraine. U.S. Deputy Ambassador to the U.N., Dorothy Camille Shea, told the 15-member council that North Korea is benefiting from the transfer of Russian military equipment, technology, and combat experience, which will make Pyongyang “more capable of waging war against its neighbors.”

Shea emphasized that this partnership is not only bolstering North Korea’s capabilities but is likely to have broader global implications. “In turn, the DPRK will likely be eager to leverage these improvements to promote weapons sales and military training contracts globally,” she warned. The acronym DPRK refers to North Korea’s official name, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea.

Shea’s remarks followed a Monday missile test by North Korea, which it claimed was part of its ongoing efforts to develop advanced military technology. The missile, identified as an intermediate-range hypersonic ballistic missile, further demonstrates North Korea’s growing missile capabilities and its ambitions to strengthen its military deterrence against perceived external threats.

The U.S. delegation to the U.N. emphasized that this development, and the broader military cooperation between North Korea and Russia, poses significant risks to regional and global security. The U.S. has urged the international community to take stronger measures to curb North Korea’s military expansion and prevent the spread of dangerous weapons technology.

North Korea’s involvement in the Ukraine conflict, including its provision of troops to fight alongside Russian forces, is seen as part of a broader strategy by Moscow to shore up its military efforts and deepen its relationship with Pyongyang. The alliance allows Russia to gain access to North Korea’s growing stockpile of weaponry, while North Korea benefits from valuable military experience in combat zones like Ukraine.

As the DPRK continues to enhance its military capabilities, U.S. officials are deeply concerned that Pyongyang’s growing power and access to advanced military technologies could destabilize the region, further inflame tensions on the Korean Peninsula, and facilitate the proliferation of weapons and military expertise to other rogue states.

North Korea Defends Missile Test, Accuses US of Double Standards

North Korea’s U.N. Ambassador, Kim Song, justified Monday’s missile test as part of the country’s plan to enhance its self-defense capabilities, while also accusing the United States of double standards in its approach to international conflicts.

Speaking to the U.N. Security Council, Kim criticized the U.S. for its support of Israel’s actions in Gaza, stating, “When the civilian death toll exceeded 45,000 in Gaza, the United States embellished Israel’s nefarious mass killing atrocity as the right to self-defense.” He contrasted this with the U.S.’s condemnation of North Korea’s missile activities, calling them a “legitimate exercise of the right to self-defense” for Pyongyang.

Kim’s remarks highlighted the growing tension between North Korea and the U.S. regarding military development and defense policies. He accused the United States of applying double standards by supporting what he described as Israel’s “mass killing atrocity” in Gaza, while simultaneously criticizing North Korea’s actions aimed at bolstering its military capabilities.

The comments came after North Korea conducted a missile test on Monday, which it claimed was part of a strategy to improve its defense systems amid escalating tensions on the Korean Peninsula and broader regional security concerns. Despite the international criticism, North Korea maintains that its military advancements are necessary for its national defense, particularly against what it views as external threats from the U.S. and its allies.

Kim’s statement underscores the complex geopolitical dynamics at play, with North Korea positioning itself as a defender of its sovereignty while challenging U.S. policies it perceives as biased and hypocritical. As the U.S. and North Korea continue to clash over missile tests and military activities, the situation remains a flashpoint for broader global security concerns.

Russia Defends North Korea, Rejects US Allegations of Tech Sharing

At a U.N. Security Council meeting, Russia’s U.N. Ambassador, Vassily Nebenzia, repeated Moscow’s long-standing accusation that joint military exercises by the U.S., South Korea, and Japan provoke North Korea, contributing to rising tensions in the region. Nebenzia argued that these drills escalated tensions and justified North Korea’s defensive actions, while dismissing U.S. claims about military cooperation between Russia and North Korea.

Nebenzia rejected a U.S. allegation that Russia planned to share satellite and space technology with North Korea, calling the accusation “wholly unsubstantiated” and accusing the U.S. of spreading “baseless conjecture” to smear the relationship between Moscow and Pyongyang. He also took the opportunity to congratulate North Korean leader Kim Jong Un on his birthday, signaling continued diplomatic support between Russia and North Korea amidst the ongoing tensions.

Meanwhile, South Korea’s U.N. Ambassador, Joonkook Hwang, condemned North Korea’s military actions and the role of the country’s leadership. Hwang referred to North Korea’s soldiers as “essentially slaves to Kim Jong Un,” alleging that they are brainwashed to fight and die on distant battlefields. He claimed that these soldiers’ sacrifices were driven by the need to fund Kim Jong Un’s regime and secure advanced military technology from Russia, as part of a broader pattern of exploiting North Korean citizens for political and military gain.

The exchange underscores the growing divisions at the U.N., with Russia defending its ties with North Korea and questioning U.S. motives, while South Korea remains highly critical of the North’s regime and its military strategies. The debate reflects the broader geopolitical rift between the U.S., its allies, and Russia, as well as the deepening concerns over North Korea’s military ambitions and regional security.

U.N. Sanctions on North Korea and Russia’s Veto Power

North Korea has been subject to U.N. sanctions since 2006, a series of measures imposed to curb its nuclear weapons and ballistic missile programs. Over the years, these sanctions have been progressively tightened in response to North Korea’s repeated missile tests and nuclear activities. The sanctions aim to limit Pyongyang’s access to critical resources and technologies that could further its military ambitions.

However, despite the ongoing efforts by the U.S. and its allies to increase pressure on North Korea, Russia’s veto power on the U.N. Security Council has been a significant obstacle to additional or more stringent action. As a permanent member of the Security Council, Russia has the ability to block any proposed resolutions, including those that would further escalate sanctions or take more aggressive measures against North Korea. This has effectively stymied any major international response to North Korea’s continued missile tests and its growing military cooperation with Russia.

The political and strategic alliance between Russia and North Korea, particularly in the context of the war in Ukraine, has added a layer of complexity to the situation. Moscow’s support for Pyongyang, coupled with its veto power, ensures that any further Security Council action on North Korea is unlikely to gain traction in the near future.

As a result, North Korea continues to benefit from its relationship with Russia, and the lack of meaningful U.N. action allows Pyongyang to pursue its military ambitions with relative impunity, while the broader international community is left in a prolonged stalemate.

Courtesy: Firstpost

References

• ^ “Korea, North”. The World Factbook. Central Intelligence Agency. 6 December 2023. Archived from the original on 12 August 2015. Retrieved 8 December 2023.
• ^ Jump up to:^a b Demographic Yearbook – Table 3: Population by sex, rate of population increase, surface area and density (PDF). United Nations Statistics Division. 2012. p. 5. Archived (PDF) from the original on 26 August 2020. Retrieved 29 November 2014.
• ^ “North Korea country profile”. BBC News. 17 October 2023. Archived from the original on 7 June 2022. Retrieved 17 October 2023.
• ^ “Korea North”. The World Factbook (2025 ed.). Central Intelligence Agency. Retrieved 12 November 2024.
• ^ Jump up to:^a b “Real GDP (purchasing power parity)”. www.cia.gov. CIA World Factbook.
• ^ Jump up to:^a b “GDP (PPP) per capita Field listing”. CIA World Factbook. Archived from the original on 25 June 2014. Retrieved 31 May 2014.
• ^ “UNData app”. data.un.org. Archived from the original on 28 November 2022. Retrieved 12 October 2022.
• ^ “Decree on Redesignating Pyongyang Time”. Naenara. 30 April 2018. Archived from the original on 5 May 2018. Retrieved 4 May 2018.
• ^ Jump up to:^a b “Telephone System Field Listing”. CIA The World Factbook. Archived from the original on 25 June 2014. Retrieved 17 June 2014.
• ^ Jump up to:^a b Hersher, Rebecca (21 September 2016). “North Korea Accidentally Reveals It Only Has 28 Websites”. NPR. Archived from the original on 22 September 2016. Retrieved 22 September 2016.
• ^ McCurry, Justin (16 January 2024). “Unification with South Korea no longer possible, says Kim Jong-un”. The Guardian. p. 1.
• ^ “Chapter I. Politics”. Socialist Constitution of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (2019) . 2019 – via Wikisource.
• ^ Korea原名Corea 美國改的名 (in Chinese). United Daily News. 5 July 2008. Archived from the original on 6 October 2014. Retrieved 28 March 2014.
• ^ Buzo, Adrian (2002). The Making of Modern Korea. London: Routledge. p. 72. ISBN 978-0-415-23749-9.
• ^ Cumings, Bruce (2005). Korea’s Place in the Sun: A Modern History. New York: W. W. Norton & Company. pp. 505–506. ISBN 978-0-393-32702-1.
• ^ Young, Benjamin R (7 February 2014). “Why is North Korea called the DPRK?”. NK News. Archived from the original on 9 February 2014. Retrieved 9 February 2014.
• ^ “Early Korea”. Archived from the original on 25 June 2015.
• ^ *매국사학의 몸통들아, 공개토론장으로 나와라!. ngonews. 24 December 2015. Archived from the original on 19 September 2016.
  • 요서 vs 평양… 한무제가 세운 낙랑군 위치 놓고 열띤 토론. Segye Ilbo. 21 August 2016. Archived from the original on 13 April 2017.
  • “갈석산 동쪽 요서도 고조선 땅” vs “고고학 증거와 불일치”. The Dong-a Ilbo. 22 August 2016. Archived from the original on 24 February 2021. Retrieved 14 April 2017.
• ^ Yi, Ki-baek (1984). A New History of Korea. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. pp. 12, 56. ISBN 978-0-674-61576-2.
• ^ Cumings, Bruce (2005). Korea’s Place in the Sun: A Modern History. New York: W. W. Norton & Company. p. 182. ISBN 978-0-393-32702-1.
• ^ Cumings, Bruce (2005). Korea’s Place in the Sun: A Modern History. New York: W. W. Norton & Company. pp. 174–175, 407. ISBN 978-0-393-32702-1.
• ^ Robinson, Michael E (2007). Korea’s Twentieth-Century Odyssey. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press. pp. 84–86. ISBN 978-0-8248-3174-5.
• ^ Lone, Stewart; McCormack, Gavan (1993). Korea since 1850. Melbourne: Longman Cheshire. pp. 184–185.
• ^ Lone, Stewart; McCormack, Gavan (1993). Korea since 1850. Melbourne: Longman Cheshire. p. 175.
• ^ Robinson, Michael E (2007). Korea’s Twentieth-Century Odyssey. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press. p. 113. ISBN 978-0-8248-3174-5.
• ^ Lankov, Andrei (16 March 2005). “North Korea’s missionary position”. Asia Times Online. Archived from the original on 18 March 2005. Retrieved 24 February 2024.
• ^ Robinson, Michael E (2007). Korea’s Twentieth-Century Odyssey. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press. pp. 85–87, 155. ISBN 978-0-8248-3174-5.
• ^ “Administrative Population and Divisions Figures (#26)” (PDF). DPRK: The Land of the Morning Calm. Permanent Committee on Geographical Names for British Official Use. April 2003. Archived from the original (PDF) on 25 September 2006. Retrieved 10 October 2006.
• ^ Lankov, Andrei (25 January 2012). “Terenti Shtykov: the other ruler of nascent N. Korea”. The Korea Times. Archived from the original on 17 April 2015. Retrieved 14 April 2015.
• ^ Dowling, Timothy (2011). “Terentii Shtykov”. History and the Headlines. ABC-CLIO. Archived from the original on 24 September 2015. Retrieved 26 April 2015.
• ^ Lankov, Andrei. “North Korea in 1945–48: The Soviet Occupation and the Birth of the State”. From Stalin to Kim Il Sung – The Formation of North Korea, 1945–1960. pp. 2–3.
• ^ Lankov, Andrei (10 April 2013). The Real North Korea: Life and Politics in the Failed Stalinist Utopia. Oxford University Press. p. 7.
• ^ “United Nations Security Council – History”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Archived from the original on 12 May 2021. Retrieved 12 May 2021.
• ^ “U.S.: N. Korea Boosting Guerrilla War Capabilities”. Fox News Network, LLC. Associated Press. 23 June 2009. Archived from the original on 27 June 2009. Retrieved 4 July 2009.
• ^ Kim, Samuel S. (2014). “The Evolving Asian System”. International Relations of Asia. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 45. ISBN 978-1442226418. With three of the four major Cold War fault lines—divided Germany, divided Korea, divided China, and divided Vietnam – East Asia acquired the dubious distinction of having engendered the largest number of armed conflicts resulting in higher fatalities between 1945 and 1994 than any other region or sub-region. Even in Asia, while Central and South Asia produced a regional total of 2.8 million in human fatalities, East Asia’s regional total is 10.4 million including the Chinese Civil War (1 million), the Korean War (3 million), the Vietnam War (2 million), and the Pol Pot genocide in Cambodia (1 to 2 million).
• ^ Cumings, Bruce (2011). The Korean War: A History. Modern Library. p. 35. ISBN 978-0812978964. Various encyclopedias state that the countries involved in the three-year conflict suffered a total of more than 4 million casualties, of which at least 2 million were civilians—a higher percentage than in World War II or Vietnam. A total of 36,940 Americans lost their lives in the Korean theater; of these, 33,665 were killed in action, while 3,275 died there of nonhostile causes. Some 92,134 Americans were wounded in action, and decades later, 8,176 were still reported as missing. South Korea sustained 1,312,836 casualties, including 415,004 dead. Casualties among other UN allies totaled 16,532, including 3,094 dead. Estimated North Korean casualties numbered 2 million, including about one million civilians and 520,000 soldiers. An estimated 900,000 Chinese soldiers lost their lives in combat.
• ^ McGuire, James (2010). Wealth, Health, and Democracy in East Asia and Latin America. Cambridge University Press. p. 203. ISBN 978-1139486224. In Korea, war in the early 1950s cost nearly 3 million lives, including nearly a million civilian dead in South Korea.
• ^ Painter, David S. (1999). The Cold War: An International History. Routledge. p. 30. ISBN 978-0415153164. Before it ended, the Korean War cost over 3 million people their lives, including over 50,000 US servicemen and women and a much higher number of Chinese and Korean lives. The war also set in motion a number of changes that led to the militarization and intensification of the Cold War.
• ^ Lewy, Guenter (1980). America in Vietnam. Oxford University Press. pp. 450–453. ISBN 978-0199874231. For the Korean War the only hard statistic is that of American military deaths, which included 33,629 battle deaths and 20,617 who died of other causes. The North Korean and Chinese Communists never published statistics of their casualties. The number of South Korean military deaths has been given as in excess of 400,000; the South Korean Ministry of Defense puts the number of killed and missing at 281,257. Estimates of communist troops killed are about one-half million. The total number of Korean civilians who died in the fighting, which left almost every major city in North and South Korea in ruins, has been estimated at between 2 and 3 million. This adds up to almost 1 million military deaths and a possible 2.5 million civilians who were killed or died as a result of this extremely destructive conflict. The proportion of civilians killed in the major wars of this century (and not only in the major ones) has thus risen steadily. It reached about 42 percent in World War II and may have gone as high as 70 percent in the Korean War. … we find that the ratio of civilian to military deaths [in Vietnam] is not substantially different from that of World War II and is well below that of the Korean War.
• ^ Armstrong 2010, p. 1: “The number of Korean dead, injured or missing by war’s end approached three million, ten percent of the overall population. The majority of those killed were in the North, which had half of the population of the South; although the DPRK does not have official figures, possibly twelve to fifteen percent of the population was killed in the war, a figure close to or surpassing the proportion of Soviet citizens killed in World War II.”
• ^ Cumings, Bruce (1997). Korea’s Place in the Sun: A Modern History. WW Norton & Company. pp. 297–298. ISBN 978-0-393-31681-0.
• ^ Jager 2013, pp. 237–242.
• ^ Stewart, Richard W., ed. (2005). “The Korean War, 1950–1953”. American Military History, Volume 2. United States Army Center of Military History. CMH Pub 30-22. Archived from the original on 28 May 2008. Retrieved 20 August 2007.
• ^ Abt 2014, pp. 125–126.
• ^ Brune, Lester H. (1996). The Korean War: Handbook of the Literature and Research. Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 60. ISBN 978-0-313-28969-9.
• ^ “North Korea claims 1 million youth enlist amid drone tensions”. TRTWORLD. 16 October 2024. Retrieved 16 October 2024.
• ^ “North Korea says 1.4 million apply to join army amid tensions with South”. Reuters. 15 October 2024. Retrieved 16 October 2024.
• ^ Armstrong 2010, p. 9.
• ^ Jump up to:^a b Chung, Chin O. Pyongyang Between Peking and Moscow: North Korea’s Involvement in the Sino-Soviet Dispute, 1958–1975. University of Alabama, 1978, p. 45.
• ^ Jump up to:^a b Zagoria, Donald S.; Kim, Young Kun (December 1975). “North Korea and the Major Powers”. Asian Survey. 15 (12): 1017–1035. doi:10.2307/2643582. ISSN 0004-4687. JSTOR 2643582.
• ^ Country Study 2009, p. XV.
• ^ Schaefer, Bernd. “North Korean ‘Adventurism’ and China’s Long Shadow, 1966–1972”. Washington, D.C.: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, 2004.
• ^ Campbell, John Coert (196). American Policy Toward Communist Eastern Europe: The Choices Ahead. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. p. 116. ISBN 0-8166-0345-6.
• ^ Armstrong, Charles. Tyranny of the Weak: North Korea and the World, 1950–1992. Studies of the Weatherhead East Asian Institute, Columbia University. Cornell University Press. pp. 99–100.
• ^ Country Study 2009, pp. xxxii, 46.
• ^ French 2007, pp. 97–99.
• ^ Cumings, Bruce (2011). North Korea: Another Country. The New Press. p. 9. ISBN 978-1-59558-739-8.
• ^ Jump up to:^a b Lankov, Andrei (2013). The Real North Korea: Life and Politics in the Failed Stalinist Utopia. OUP US. p. 64. ISBN 978-0-19-996429-1.
• ^ Demick, Barbara (16 July 2010). “North Korea’s giant leap backwards”. The Guardian. Retrieved 21 January 2021.
• ^ Kirkbride, Wayne (1984). DMZ, a story of the Panmunjom axe murder. Hollym International Corp.
• ^ Bandow, Doug; Carpenter, Ted Galen, eds. (1992). The U.S.–South Korean Alliance: Time for a Change. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers. pp. 99–100. ISBN 978-1-4128-4086-6. Archived from the original on 13 September 2016.
• ^ Chinoy, Mike (8 July 1997). “North Korea ends mourning for Kim Il Sung”. CNN. Archived from the original on 19 May 2015. Retrieved 9 May 2015.
• ^ Kwak, Tae-Hwan; Joo, Seung-Ho (2003). The Korean peace process and the four powers. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd. ISBN 978-0-7546-3653-3.
• ^ DeRouen, Karl; Heo, Uk (2005). Defense and Security: A Compendium of National Armed Forces and Security Policies. ABC-CLIO.
• ^ “North Korea’s Military Strategy” Archived 24 February 2013 at the Wayback Machine, Parameters, U.S. Army War College Quarterly.
• ^ Jump up to:^a b Spoorenberg, Thomas; Schwekendiek, Daniel (2012). “Demographic Changes in North Korea: 1993–2008”. Population and Development Review. 38 (1): 133–158. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2012.00475.x. hdl:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2012.00475.x.
• ^ Jager 2013, p. 456.
• ^ Abt 2014, pp. 55, 109, 119.
• ^ Oberdorfer, Don; Carlin, Robert (2014). The Two Koreas: A Contemporary History. Basic Books. pp. 357–359. ISBN 978-0465031238.
• ^ Burns, Robert; Gearan, Anne (13 October 2006). “U.S.: Test Points to N. Korea Nuke Blast”. The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 5 October 2016. Retrieved 18 January 2020.
• ^ Bliss, Jeff (16 October 2006). “North Korea Nuclear Test Confirmed by U.S. Intelligence Agency”. Bloomberg News. Archived from the original on 30 September 2007. Retrieved 16 October 2006.
• ^ Lee, Sung-Yoon (26 August 2010). “The Pyongyang Playbook”. Foreign Policy. Archived from the original on 4 September 2010. Retrieved 6 November 2010.
• ^ Jump up to:^a b “Anger at North Korea over sinking”. BBC News. 20 May 2010. Archived from the original on 23 May 2010. Retrieved 23 May 2010.
• ^ Deok-hyun Kim (24 November 2010). “S. Korea to toughen rules of engagement against N. Korean attack”. Archived from the original on 1 December 2010. Retrieved 24 November 2010.
• ^ Korean Central News Agency. “Lee Myung Bak Group Accused of Scuttling Dialogue and Humanitarian Work”. Archived from the original on 28 November 2010. Retrieved 24 November 2010.
• ^ “North Korean leader Kim Jong Il, 69, has died”. Associated Press. 19 December 2011. Archived from the original on 20 December 2011. Retrieved 19 December 2011.
• ^ Albert, Eleanor (3 January 2018). “North Korea’s Military Capabilities”. Council on Foreign Relations. Archived from the original on 20 June 2017. Retrieved 11 March 2018.
• ^ Bierman, Noah (31 August 2017). “Trump warns North Korea of ‘fire and fury'”. Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on 4 August 2018. Retrieved 4 August 2018.
• ^ “N Korea promises Guam strike plan in days”. BBC News. 10 August 2017. Archived from the original on 6 August 2018. Retrieved 4 August 2018.
• ^ Jump up to:^a b Ji, Dagyum (12 February 2018). “Delegation visit shows N. Korea can take ‘drastic’ steps to improve relations: MOU”. NK News. Archived from the original on 28 March 2018. Retrieved 18 January 2020.
• ^ Donald Trump meets Kim Jong Un in DMZ; steps onto North Korean soil. Archived 15 February 2021 at the Wayback Machine USA Today. 30 June 2019.
• ^ Hyonhee Shin (11 January 2021). “Mixed signals for North Korean leader’s sister as Kim seeks to cement power”. Reuters. Archived from the original on 26 September 2023. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
• ^ Seo, Yoonjung; Bae, Gawon; Jozuka, Emiko; Lendon, Brad (24 March 2022). “North Korea fires first suspected ICBM since 2017”. CNN. Archived from the original on 7 May 2022. Retrieved 12 June 2022.
• ^ “North Korea declares itself a nuclear weapons state”. BBC News. 9 September 2022. Archived from the original on 9 September 2022. Retrieved 9 September 2022.
• ^ “조선로동당 중앙위원회 제8기 제9차전원회의 확대회의에 관한 보도”. www.rodong.rep.kp. 로동신문. Archived from the original on 25 January 2024. Retrieved 25 January 2024.
• ^ “공화국의 부흥발전과 인민들의 복리증진을 위한 당면과업에 대하여”. www.rodong.rep.kp. 로동신문. Archived from the original on 25 January 2024. Retrieved 25 January 2024.
• ^ “What we know about North Korean troops fighting Russia’s war”. BBC News. 23 December 2024.
• ^ “Watch: North Koreans hunted by Ukrainian drones”. The Telegraph. 23 December 2024.
• ^ Jump up to:^a b c “Topography and Drainage”. Library of Congress. 1 June 1993. Archived from the original on 17 November 2004. Retrieved 17 August 2009.
• ^ Song, Yong-deok (2007). “The recognition of mountain Baekdu in the Koryo dynasty and early times of the Joseon dynasty”. History and Reality V.64.
• ^ United Nations Environmental Programme. “DPR Korea: State of the Environment, 2003” (PDF). p. 12. Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 July 2010. Retrieved 26 August 2014.
• ^ Grantham, H. S.; et al. (2020). “Anthropogenic modification of forests means only 40% of remaining forests have high ecosystem integrity – Supplementary Material”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 5978. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.5978G. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-19493-3. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7723057. PMID 33293507.
• ^ Caraway, Bill (2007). “Korea Geography”. The Korean History Project. Archived from the original on 6 July 2007. Retrieved 1 August 2007.
• ^ Dinerstein, Eric; et al. (2017). “An Ecoregion-Based Approach to Protecting Half the Terrestrial Realm”. BioScience. 67 (6): 534–545. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix014. ISSN 0006-3568. PMC 5451287. PMID 28608869.
• ^ Jump up to:^a b c “North Korea Country Studies. Climate”. Lcweb2.loc.gov. Archived from the original on 12 December 2012. Retrieved 23 June 2010.
• ^ “North Korea country profile”. BBC News. 9 April 2018. Archived from the original on 8 March 2021. Retrieved 21 June 2018.
• ^ “Kim Jong Un’s North Korea: Life inside the totalitarian state”. Washington Post. Archived from the original on 1 February 2021. Retrieved 31 October 2020.
• ^ “Totalitarianism”. Encyclopædia Britannica. 2018. Archived from the original on 17 March 2021. Retrieved 31 October 2020.
• ^ “Korea, North”. Britannica Book of the Year 2014. London: Encyclopedia Britannica, Inc. 2014. p. 642. ISBN 978-1-62513-171-3.
• ^ Jump up to:^a b c “DPRK Socialist Constitution”. www.naenara.com.kp. Archived from the original on 15 August 2021. Retrieved 24 April 2020.